State of Manipur Vs. All Manipur Appointment Under the Die-in-harness Scheme Association and ors.

Decided On : Dec-16-2003

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Constitutional, Article 14 or 16 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 and 16, Constitutional, Article 14 of the Constitution or, Constitution, Constitution, the Recruitment Rules

ORG: P.P. Naolekar, the High Court, the State of Manipur, Government, the State Government, the State Government, Government, the State of Manipur, State, Court, Govt, Government, the State Government, State, the State Respondents, the State Government, Government, the Offer Forms, State, State, the State Government's, the State of Manipur, the State Government, Scheme, the State Government, Court, the State of Manipur, Court, Scheme, Government, Scheme, Government, the Manipur Public Service Commission, MPSC, the Recruitment Rules, Government, Department, Scheme, Government, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Government, Medical Board, Government, Government, Government, Government, the Manipur Service, Scheme, the State Government, the State Government, all Public Section Undertakings, Autonomous Bodies, The State of Manipur, Finance Department, The State of Manipur, Departments, the State Government, the State Government, The State of Manipur, Cabinet, Committee, State, Departments, the State Government, the Apex Court, State, the Supreme Court, State, Court, Court, the High Courts, Union of India, the Apex Court, Scheme, Education, the Apex Court, Court, State, State, Government, Court, Government, Scheme, State, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the State Government, the State Government, Scheme, State, State, State, Autonomous Bodies, the State Government, the State Government, State, the State Government, Cabinet, Departments, the State Government, Government, State, Peerless General Finance, Co. Ltd., Reserve Bank of India, the Supreme Court, Court, T.N., the Supreme Court, Court, Court, un, the Apex Court, Parliament, Parliament, the State of Madhya Pradesh, M.P. Oil, Supreme, Court, State, the Apex Court, Balco Employees' Union (Regd, Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court, Government, the Apex Court, Courts, Government, Court, Court, the State or Authority, the State Government, State, the State Government, Court, the State Government, Government, the State Cabinet, State, State, Government, Government, the Department of Personnel & Administrative, Government, State Government's, the High Court, Department, The Administrative Departments, Court, Suffice, the State Government, Court

GPE: the State of Manipur, Manipur, Manipur, the State of, the State of Manipur, Manipur, India, Umesh, Nagpal, Sushma Gosain v., Manipur, Manipur, Premium Granites v., Delhi, Narmada

DATE: 16.3.2001, 21.12.2001, 3(three) weeks, 1) month, 16.3.2001, a period of, one month, 1st December, 1995, one year, 13th January, 1999, the age of 55 years, 1982, 19th October, 1999, 6th November, 1999, 24th July, 2000, 16th March, 2001, 11th July, 2001, 1996, 1989, 2003, 6th November, 1999, 24th July 2000, 16.3.2001, 2000, 47, 16.3.2001, 29th October, 2002, 29th October, 2002

CARDINAL: 155, three, 1, 88, 143, 144 to 154, 4, 16.3.2001, 16.3.2001, one, 16.3.2001, 1340/2001.4, 92, only one, 19.3.2001, 7.3.2001, 5, 1994)IILLJ173SC, 1994]3SCR893, 4, 1998]3SCR432, one, 1999)IILLJ454SC, two, 7, 704.11, 16.3.2001, 19.10.1999, 1991CriLJ1391, 1994]1SCR579, 1996]2SCR767, 1997)7SCC592, 2, 333, 16.3.2001

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Govt, Govt, Single Judge, Single, Single, Executive, Single, Single

PRODUCT: the 'Die-in-, the 'Die-in-Harness Scheme'

PERSON: Order, Banks, Law, Haryana v. Rani Devi, Asha Ramchhandra Ambedkar, Haryana, Pushpendra Kumar, MD Rajodin, Haryana, Anr, Ankur Gupta, Grade-III, Ashok Potsangbam, Banks, Bachao Andolan v. Union, and(iv, Government

FAC: Constitutional, Constitutional

WORK_OF_ART: Scheme of Die-in-Harness Scheme