National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Okram Subhash Chandra Singh and anr.

Decided On : Jan-18-2007

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Section 30, the National High Way No., Section 30, the W.C. Act, Section 147(2, Section 30.9, the M.V. Act, Act 8, Section 140, Chapter, Section 147, the M.V. Act, the M.V. Act, Section 163A, Motor Vehicles Act, Chapter X, Motor Vehicles Act, the W.C. Act altogether.14, the W.C. Act, the W.C. Act, Motor Vehicles Act, Section 149, the M.V. Act, Section 30, Chapter X, Section 149, Section 170 of the 1988 Act, Section 149, Section 143 of the Act, Section 143 of the 1988 Act, Chapter XI, Section 30 of the Act 1923, Section 173 of the 1988 Act, Section 30, Section 30, the W.C. Act, Section 149, the M.V. Act, the Act better….23, Section 2(1)1

ORG: B.D. Agarwal, the National Insurance Company Limited, Claimants, the National Insurance Company Limited, Rupees One Lakh, Vehicle, the Claimant/Respondent No, the Insurance Company, the Judgment of this Court, New India Insurance Co., Insurance Company, Counsel, the Insurance Company, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court, United Insurance Co. Ltd., ACC 497, SC, Court, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., the Judgment of Madhya Pradesh High Court, Oriental Insurance Co., Karnataka High Court, Myosore Sugar Co. Ltd., ACC, Kerala High Court, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., ACC, the Insurance Company, Claimants, Sections 143, Applicability of Chapter, and(b, xxx(5, Court, the Claims Tribunal of the, or(d, Tribunal, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Court, Court, M.V. Act, National Insurance Co. Ltd., Court, M.V. Act, M.V. Act, Lordships, Learned Counsel, the Apex Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., the Apex Court, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, the High Court, Court, the Insurance Company, Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, Court, The Workmen's Compensation Act, Court, Karnataka High Court, Karnataka High Court, Schedule 1, K. Abdullakutty, Court, Kerala High Court, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company

NORP: J.1, Imphal, Physician

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act, Workmen's Compensation Act

DATE: 1923, 2003, yesterday, today, 04.02.2002, 2000, 1998, 1999, 1997, 1997, 1994, 1998, 1923, 1923, 8 of 1923, 1999, 18.05.2005, 1998, 1998, '18, 1923, 28.03.2003, a period of, three months

CARDINAL: 27.11.2003, 16, four, forty-three thousand, 1, 2, 21, 2, 39, 2, 1, 4,40,965.80/-, two, 2, 567, 1, 1, 1, 1, 147, 149, 1923-, 1, 1, 2)(i, 1, one, 4, 3.8.2005, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2006)ILLJ704SC, words:13, 2, 2, 2, 1, 1, 1

PERSON: G. Pushpa, N. Kotiswar, B. Surendra, L. Indrakumar, Court, Sanjit Kumar, Anr, G. Pushpa, B. Surrender, Anr, B.T. Krishnamurthy, Anr, K. Abdullakutty, Act.147 Requirement, xxx(2, Anr, Sapam Devan Singh, Anr, Anr, Birchandra Singh, Shivalinga S. Patil v. Erappa B. Bhavihala, Beti Bai, Shivalinga Shivanagowda Patil

GPE: Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, India, Shankarayya, Counsel, India, Workmen, L.C.R., Workmen, Manipur

ORDINAL: 3rd, first, third, third, third

PERCENT: 60%, 60%, 50%

WORK_OF_ART: Babital and Ors

PRODUCT: Manuhoram, Mastan, The Full Bench, Judgment, Shri Sanjit