Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Choudhary Kirana Bhandar Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Apr-26-1996

Court : Patna

LAW: Section 256(1, the Indian Partnership Act, Section 4 of the Partnership Act, Section 256

CARDINAL: 1, 2, two, 1,001, 1,001, 3, two, 1971]82ITR680(SC, 1965]57ITR762(Patna, 1988]171ITR263(All, 1966]59ITR424(MP, 4., 5., 6, 8., 9

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Hanuman Prasad Choudhary, Murlidhar Choudhary, Murlidhar Choudhary, Hanuman Prasad Choudhary, Smt, Appellate, Appellate, Smt, Department, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Department, CIT, Himalaya Engineering Co., CIT, United Patel Construction Co., CIT, Smt, Smt, Smt, Smt, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

DATE: years 1976-77 to 1978-79, year 1975-76, June 30, 1975, the assessment years

PERSON: Kirana Bhandar, Darbhanga, Indu Devi, Kirana Bhandar, Indu Devi, Kirana Bhandar, Indu Devi, Pawan Kumar, K. D. Kamath, Virendra Kumar Avinash, Kumar, Indu Devi, Indu Devi, Indu Devi, Indu Devi, Pawan Kumar

MONEY: nine per cent, nine per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //