Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Atul Chandra BuragohaIn Vs. State of Assam

Decided On : Sep-19-2006

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Section 409, Section 409 IPC, Section 409 IPC, Section 219 Cr, Section 13(2, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 173(8, Section 13(1)(c, Section 173(8, Section 170 of the Code, Section 170, Section 169 of the Code, Section 169, Section 170, Section 169 of the Code, Section 173, Section 190(1)(b, the Section 173(8, Section 173(8, Section 173(8, Section 173(8, Section 173, Section 173, Section 173, Section 173(8, Section 154, Section 190, Section 190, Section 202, Section 155, Section 155, Section 156 of the Code, Section 156, Chapter XIII.(2, Section 190, Section 156(3, Section 156, Section 156(3, Section 156, Section 156(3, Section 2(o, Section 2(s, Section 156, Section 2(o, Section 2(o, Section 156(3, Section 136 of the Code, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Section 156(3

GPE: I.A., Counsel, Assam, P.C., Rajasthan, Dhasmana, Rajasthan, Rajasthan

NORP: Ansari, J.1

ORG: the Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI, Public Prosecutor, the Vigilance P.S. Case No, the Vigilance P.S. Case No, the Special Judicial Magistrate, Special Judicial Magistrate, inter alia, State, CBI, Magistrate, the Prevention of Corruption Act, CBI, Magistrate, CBI, CBI, Central Bureau of Investigation v. State of, Public Prosecutor, Magistrate, Public Prosecutor, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Magistrate, CBI, Magistrate, Central Bureau of Investigation, Magistrate, CBI, Public Prosecutor, Delhi Administration, Supp, the Police Manual, the State Government, Magistrate, Magistrate, Central Bureau of Investigation, Union Public Service Commission, CBI, the First Information Report, FIR, FIR, hereunder:156, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, See Central Bureau of Investigation v. State of, CBI, CBI, the Supreme Court, Central Bureau of Investigation v. State of, CBI, CBI, CBI, Special Judicial Magistrate

CARDINAL: 2., 1/2000, 1/2000, 2, more than three, one, 2001CriLJ968 .5, 2001CriLJ4190, 482.6, 2, not.9, 2, 2, 6, 2, 10, 8), 8), 2, 2001CriLJ4190, 1997CriLJ4636, 1985CriLJ1521 .11, two, 1, 1, 1, 2, 17, 2(s, 2001CriLJ968, 2001CriLJ968

PERSON: U. Bhuyan, P. Bora, Guwahati, U. Bhuyan, Bhuyan, U. Bhuyan, Bhuyan, Anr, Bora, Hemant Dhasmana, Anr, Kashmeri Devi v., Anr, Singh v. Commissioner of Police, Anr, S. Papaiah, Singh v. Commissioner of Police, Anr

DATE: 12(A)/2002, twelve months, eight years, 1990, 1998, 5.5.2006, 1988, 1988, '19

ORDINAL: first, 1985CriLJ1521, third

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //