Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Guru Charan Singh and ors. Vs. Mahatam Singh and anr.

Decided On : Oct-18-2005

Court : Patna

LAW: the Indian Contract Act, Rule 3, Section 96 of the Code, Rule 1-A Sub-rule, the Indian Contract Act, Rule 3, Order 43, Section 96(3, Order 43, Order 23, Order 43, Section 96(3, Section 96(3, Section 96 of the Code

CARDINAL: 1, one, 17, 3, 3A, one, one, 2, 184, 1, 21.7, 104, 2, 3, 3A, one, 9, one, 3A, one, 2, 7, 9, 9, 1A(2, 1(m, 1993(2, 725

GPE: S.N. Hussain, Lagandeo, Singh, L.R., Recorded, Lagandeo

ORG: Partition Suit, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, SC, Court, Court, Court, Court, this rule.]3A. Bar, Court, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Apex Court, Court, Ors, Ors, the Supreme Court, Civil Revision, the plaintiff/ opposite party

DATE: 1956, 1992, 1993, 1976, 1976, 1872

PERSON: S.N. Hussain, S.N. Hussain, Satyadeo Singh, Banwari Lal v. Smt, Chando Devi, Anr, Order XLIII, Order XXIII Rule, Satisfaction, Nagendra Rai, Singh, Order XLIII, Banwari Lal, Rule 3A, lawful.10, S.B. Sinha, Noor Mohammad Khan, Mary Khan

ORDINAL: second

LOC: Single Judge

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //