Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Karam Thamarjit Singh Vs. Md. AllauddIn Khan

Decided On : Feb-11-2008

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Section 100(1)(d, the R.O.P. Act', the Civil Procedure Code, the ROP Act, Section 84, Section 87, Section 97, Section 100, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 83, Constitution, Section 84, Section 97, Section 84, the ROP Act, the ROP Act, Section 87, Section 84, Section 97, Section 97, the ROP Act, Section 97, Section 100, Section 100(1)(a, Section 100(1)(d, Section 100(1)(d, Section 100(1)(d, Section 97(1, Section 97(1, Section 100(1)(d)(iii, Section 100, Section 101, Section 97, Section 100(1)(d)(iii, Section 97(1, Section 97(1, Section 83 of the Act, Section 97, the ROP Act, Section 87, the ROP Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 87, Section 97, the ROP Act, the ROP Act.20, Section 87(1, The Section 87(1, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 86(7, Section 97, Section 84, Section 97, the ROP Act, Section 97, the ROP Act

ORG: B.D. Agarwal, Manipur Legislative Assembly, 6-Keirao Assembly, Shri Thamarjit Singh, the Hon'ble Court, CPC, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, High Court, Learned Counsel, CPC, CPC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the High Court, CPC, Learned Counsel, CPC.10, Gauhati High Court, AIR 1987 Gau 11, Rajasthan High Court, Punjab & Haryana High Court, the Apex Court, CPC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Parliament, the State Legislature, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, SC, Election Court, CPC, CPC, Lordships, CPC, Act, Rajasthan High Court, CPC, Jugal Kishore AIR, Punj & Har 152, the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court, Court, Order IX, CPC, CPC, Court, Court, CPC, Main

NORP: J.1, Furkan Ansari

CARDINAL: 2, 27, 2, two, one, 1, 2, 11-6-2007, 31-10-2007, 4, 22, 31, as many as 240, 16, 5, 2, 118, 1, 1, 2, 1964]6SCR54, 2003]3SCR511, two, 1982]3SCR318, four, 1954]1SCR892, 1982]3SCR318, 1964]6SCR54, three, one, 15, 16, 1, two, two, 118, 6, two, 9, 6, 22, 31, 5,000/-, 2, 5

DATE: 2007, 1951, 2007, 1908, fourteen days, 1951, 1951, the election petition.(11, 2003, 2271, six) months, three weeks, today, 2007

ORDINAL: 9th

GPE: Md., below:(i, Singh, Counsel, Counsel, Singh, Singh, Counsel, Clauses, situations:(i, Soneswar

PERSON: Allauddin Khan, Nos, Heard Shri NPC Singh, Shri HNK, xx xx xx, xx xx xx xx(d, Jabar Singh, Genda Lal, T. A. Ahammed Kabeer v. A. A. Azeez, Arun Kumar Bose v. Mohd, Order VIII, Shri HNK, Soneswar Borah v. Nagen Neog, Kumar v. Ram Sahai, Jugal Kishore, Baldev Parkash, Rajendra Kumari Bajpai v., Ram Adhar Yadav, Order VIII, Jyoti Basu v. Debi Ghosal, a Common Law Right, Common Law, Common Law, Election Law, Common Law, Arun Kumar Bose v. Furkan, Jagannath, Jaswant Singh, Jyoti Basu, Jabar Singh, Genda Lal, Ahammed Kabeer, Rajendra Kumari Bajpai, Order XI, Order XI, Order XVIII, Gauh 11

PRODUCT: Order VI, connotation.19, the 'Act'

FAC: Sections 117, Sections 117, the Gauhati High Court

EVENT: ROP Act, ROP Act, ROP Act, the Civil Procedure Code

MONEY: 1984]1SCR118 .9

QUANTITY: 1 am

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //