Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

S. Chaoba Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Oct-01-2002

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Section 7, Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 117(2, the B.S.F. Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226, Article 226, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Clauses, Article 226, Constitution 15th Amendment Act, Article 226, Constitution 47th Amendment Act, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.6, the B.S.F. Act, Section 74, Rule 59, 'P.C. Act', Section 46 of the B.S.F. Act, the P.C. Act, section 3 of the P. C. Act, Section 4, the P.C. Act, the P.C. Act, the P. C. Act, the P. C. Act, the P.C. Act, Section 7 of the P. C. Act, Section 19, Section 19, Section 7 of the P. C. Act, Section 25, the P.C. Act, the Army Act, the Air Force Act, the Navy Act, Section 25, the B.S.F. Act, Section 25, the B.S.F. Act, Section, the B.S.F. Act, the P.C. Act, the B.S.F. Act, Section 47 of the B.S.F. Act, Section 25, Section 19, the P. C. Act, Article 226

PERSON: H.K.K. Singh, Head Constable, Constable S. Chaoba Singh, Sec, N. Ibotombi, Battalion, Imphal, Imphal Bench, Law, Uma Sankar v. Union, Mani, X-1, BSF Malda, Mani, N. Ibotombi Singh, Mani

NORP: J.1

ORG: the Border Security Force, B.S.F, Naik, BSF, Malda, LNK Ishu Bhai, the Commandant., LNK Ishu Bhai, Summary Security Forces Court, the Writ Petition, L/NK Ishu Bhai, OP, OP Point, the Summary Security Force Court, Central Government Standing Counsel, Court, Court, B.C. Patowary, Petitioner v. Union of India and Ors, the High Court, Court, this High Court, the High Court, Court, B.S.F., Malda, Malda, Imphal, Gauhati High Court, the Union of India, the Union of India, the Union of India, the Government of India, the Union of India, B.S.F., Clauses, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, this High Court, the Union of India, the High Court, State, the Calcutta High Court, the Delhi High Court, The Union of India, Union of India, the Supreme Court, State, AIR 1985 SC 1289, B.C. Patowary, Calcutta, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, the Supreme Court, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, State, Calcutta, Calcutta High Court, the Summary Security Force Courts, Petty Security Force Court, Summary Security Force Court, Court, DIG, Commandant, Summary Security Force Court, DIG, the Summary Security Force Court, the Summary Security Force Court, the B.S.F. Court, Sections 7, Air Force, Court, the Border Security Force Act, the Coast Guard Act, the National Security Guard Act, the Court of a Special, Court, Court, the Court of a Special, Court, Criminal Court, Sections 7, Court, Department, Court, Court, Court, the Force Court, High Court, Supreme Court, Court

CARDINAL: 24.12,1966, 143, 1, 2, 46, 182/5-8, 1999.Sd/-     &nbsp, 12.04.99   &nbsp, 226, 227, 1, 435, 2, 1, 1, 2, 226, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1A, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 378, 2, 14, 12, 1, 1, 47, 47, 1986).(2, 1, 1, 2, 2)(1)(g, 2)(1)(d, 12, as many as 6, six, 1, 4, 9, 9, 592, 594.12

DATE: 10.8.1990, 8.8.1998, 1045, 2000, 12 April, 13.4.1999.2, 1968, 1992, 1963, 1976, 1).5, 1982, 17, 12.4.1999, 1968, 1988, '25, 1950, 45 of 1950, 1950, 46 of 1950, 1957, 62 of 1957, 1968, 1978, 30 of 1978, 1986, 1998, 53, 1999, 521, 1997, 1, 2001

MONEY: 143 BN BSF

FAC: Nawada Gate

GPE: India, Bangladesh, Clause, Manipur, India, India, India, Clause, India, India, India, New Delhi, Rajasthan v. Swaika Properties, Rajasthan State, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, Rajasthan, Rajasthan, New Delhi, C.G.S.C., Naval, India, C.G.S.C., C.G.S.C., C.G.S.C.

TIME: 46 of this Act

ORDINAL: second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //