Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Raghu Forwarding Agency and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Jun-29-2005

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India (Civil Rule No., the Railways Act, Section 78, the Indian Railways Act, Section 78, the Indian Railways Act, Section 87 of the Act, Section 79 of the Act, Section 87 of the Act, Section 79'.10, Section 79, the Indian Railways Act, Section 79, Section 79, Section 78, Section 79, the Indian Railways Act, Section 79, Article 14 of the Constitution of India.16

CARDINAL: 1, 9,50,114.00, 3-8-1999, 9,50,114.00, five, 67/ 99, 7, 3-8-1999, 230/2002, 23-8-2002, 35, 1, 94,080.00, thirty, five, five, five, 8, 4, thirty five, 4, 4, 675/CC/, 4, 4, one, 4, 19-5-2005, One, 2%,18, 9,50.114.00.20, 3-8-99, 9,50,114.00

ORG: Respondents, Wagons, Respondents, Appellants, the Respondent Railways, Bank Guarantee, Respondents, Appellants, The Bank Guarantee, Review Application, the Civil Rule, Review, Appellants, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Wagons, Railway, Rake, Appellants, Appellants, Respondents, Panipat Thermal Power Station, Respondents, FITS, Respondents, Respondents, PTPS, The PTPS Weigh Bridge, Respondents.3.6, Court, Respondents, Respondents, the Apex Court, Jagajit Cotton Textile Mills, the Respondent Railways, Appellants, the Respondent Railways, Appellants, us.6, the Central Government, PTPS, Appellants, Respondent-Railways, the PTPS Weigh Bridge, Respondents, Appellants, Respondents, the Respondents-Railways, the Central Government, the Respondent-Railways, Respondents, the Respondent-Railways, the Central Government, & Haulage, Respondents, Respondents, Appellants, Respondents, Appellants, the Respondent-Railways, Respondents, the Respondent-Railways, Appellants, the Respondent-Railways, Appellants, the Respondent-Railways, Appellants, the Respondent-Railways, the Respondent-Railways, Respondents, the Weigh Bridge, Counsel for the Appellants, Court, Railway, Contempt Application, M/s. V.J. Agencies the Railways, the Respondent-Railways, Respondents, Weigh Bridge (Dharamkatas, The FTPS Weigh Bridge, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents

WORK_OF_ART: The Civil Rule, Judgment and Order, Civil Appeal No, The Appellants, Judgment and Order

DATE: 7-12-2002, 461 days, 1998, 1959, 1989, 1989, 1989, 1989, 9706, 1989, 199/ 2005, a period of, eight weeks

GPE: India

PERSON: Appellants, Nangal Dry Coal, Laskar, Rohtak, Laskar Weigh Bridge, Laskar, Appellants, Appellants, Station Laskar, Laskar Station, Rohtak Railway Station, Appellants, Mukhya Mal Parzabekshak, Northen Railway, Anaj Mandi, Rohtak, Sd/-, Mukhya Mal Parzabekshak.12, Mukhya Mal Parzabekshak, Appellants, Appellants, Railways, Goyal, Counsel, Railways, Appellants, Appellants

FAC: Jogighopa Railway Station, no Weigh Bridge, Jogighopa Railway, Weigh, Weigh Bridge, the Laskar Station, PTPS Weigh Bridge, the Laskar Station, Weigh Bridge, Railway

PRODUCT: Rake, Circulars, Rake

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //