Metal Stores Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Aug-21-1990

Court: Guwahati

LAW: Section 271(1)(c, Section 282, Order 5

CARDINAL: 1, 26,000, 1,14,860, 20,000, 40,000, 14,000, 40,000, 60,000, 1,24,000, 1,14,000, 1,14,000, 2, two, two, two, 1982]136ITR330(MP, 1966]62ITR109(Cal, 3, 1, 3., 4., two, one, two, 5, 6., 387, 7, 1972]83ITR26(SC, 1980]123ITR457(SC, 19, 8, 1970]77ITR107(SC, 9, 1986]157ITR330(SC, 10., 11

DATE: 1961, 1974-75, 1961, September 15, 1977, February 7, 1980, 1989]178ITR451(Cal, 1961, February 29, 1988, 1988, the day, 70, 1972]83ITR377(SC, May 26, 1960, November 18, 1961, 1961

NORP: Kashi, Punjab

PERSON: Prasad Sah, Assam Metals, Umashankar Mishra v. CIT, Behari Lal Pyare Lal, J. W. Pandey, Penalty, CrT

FAC: Mohanlal Jaichandlal, Anantharam Veerasinghaiah

ORG: Tikomchand Jain, Punamchand Ratanlal, Assam Tubes, the Commissioner of Income-tax and, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Calcutta High Court, The Calcutta High Court, CIT v. Super Steel (Sales) Co., CIT, Haryana High Court, the Supreme Court of India, Parliament, Parliament, the Directorate of Income-tax, Corpus Juris Secundum, Hindustan Steel Ltd., the Supreme Court, Co., CIT, Khoday Eswarsa, CIT v. Distributors (Baroda) P. Ltd., Jain Bros. v. Union of India, The Supreme Court, CIT

GPE: B. K. Gooyee, Orissa, Maya Rani Punj

TIME: 1972]83ITR369(SC

PRODUCT: Act