Jaideep Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Decided On : Jan-25-2008

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Section 13(2, Section 13(4, Section 13(4, Section 13(4, Section 13 of the Act, Section 17, Section 13(2, Section 13(4, Section 141, the Indian Contract Act, Section 13(3)(A, Section 17, Article 226 of the Constitution of India.14., Section 141, Section 13(3A, Section 17, Section 13, Section 17, Section 13(4, Section 17(2, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 17(4, Section 17, Article 226 of the Constitution pf, Section 17, Constitution, Section 13(2, Section 13(4, Section 13(3A, Section 17, Section 17, Section 141, the Contract Act, Section 141, the Contract Act, Section 141, the Contract Act, Section 13(3A, Section 13(2, Section 2(f, Act 30 of 2004, Section 13(3A, Section 13(2, Section 13(4, Section 13, Section 13, Section 13(4, Section 13(3A, Section 13(2, Section 13(2, Section 13(4, Section 13(4, Section 13(3A

PERSON: Amitava Roy, G.N. Sahewalla, M. Singh, K.K. Bhatra, Guwahati, Jamini, WP(C, Banks, Sahewalla, Sahewalla, Sahewalla, Anr, Bhatra, Bhatra, Appellant v. Registrar of Trade Marks, Agartala Bench(supra, Noorbari Tea Co.(P) Ltd, Anr, Sushil Kumar Agarwalla, Anr, Hemant Automobiles, aside.27

NORP: J.1, Punjab

DATE: 16.12.2006, 2002, 5837/2006, 15.12.2006, 16.12.2006, 17.12.2006, 1.12.2006, 60 days, 16.12.2006, 16.12.2006, May, 2005, 14.2.2007, 16.12.2006, 5681/2006, 22.11.2005, May, 2005, ninety days, 16.12.2006, 16.12.2006, 1872, 24.4.2007, 14.2.2007, 90 days, 14.2.2007, 16.12.2006, contextual facts.20, 22, 16.12.2006, 26.4.2007, a week, 26.3.2007, 2.5.2007, 4.5.2007, 5.5.2007, 14.2.2007, 60 days, Section 13(2, 10.03.2007, a week, 14.2.2007, a week

CARDINAL: 26.4.2007, 13(4, 1,10,000.00, 96,29,667.04, 14.2.2007, 5,000/-In, 11,70,000/-, 01.05.2007, 96,29,667.04, 15,00,000/-, 15, 31.3.2005, 15, 10,00,000/-, 97.42, 17.11.2006, 56.13, 1,10,000,00/-, 4, at least three, 2, 3, 4, 14.2.2007, 4

ORG: the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, M/s. NAP Agencies Private Limited, Court, the Respondent Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, M/s. NAP Agencies Pvt. Ltd., Bank, Court, Bank, Bank, Bank, M/s. NAP Pvt, Bank, Bank, Prudential, Bank, Bank, Non-Performing Asset, the Reserve Bank of India, RBI, Bank, Bank, Bank, WP, Court, Bank, Court, Bank, NAP Agencies Pvt. Ltd., Bank, Court, Bank, the Apex Court, Mardia Chemicals v. Union of India, the Mysore High Court, National Bank Ltd., AIR 1968, Court, Bank, Court, The Apex Court, Mardia Chemicals Ltd., the Debt Recovery Tribunal, The Apex Court, M/s. Mardia Chemicals Ltd., The Apex Court, Whirlpool Corporation, the High Courts, Fundamental Right, Act.18, UCO Bank, Bank of India, Haryana High Court, Mysore High Court, Bank, Bank, the Gauhati Branch, The Apex Court, Mardia Chemicals Ltd., Ors, Lordships, The Apex Court, Court, Court, Bank, Court, Bank, Bank, the Apex Court, Mardia Chemicals Ltd., Ors, Bank

PRODUCT: the 'Act', Debt Recovery

GPE: Guwahati, District Kamrup, Counsel, Singh, New Delhi, Counsel, India, Mumbai, Bombay

WORK_OF_ART: Late Jamini Prasad Singh

TIME: their hour

PERCENT: 50%, 95%, 75%

ORDINAL: first

EVENT: Section 13(3A