Banshidhar Construction Pvt. Ltd Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited

Decided On : Oct-04-2024

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: BCCL and M/s. Simlabahal Coal Mines Private Limited, Paragraphs 9, Paragraphs 10, Section 2, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution.24, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India

DATE: 2024, 18.07.2024, 2024, twenty-five years, 06.05.2024, 07.05.2024, 23.08.2024, 06.05.2024, 17.09.2024, 10.06.2024, 27.06.2024, 16.08.2023, 14.11.2023, 06.05.2024, 17.04.2024, the last 3, the latest financial year, the last 3, annual, the last 3, annual, 1961, 2017, 23rd July 2020, October 2020, 2020, 17th April 2020, 1415, three financial years, Annual, three financial years, 17.04.2024, the day, 1719, 1882, 1821, 1923, 1982, 1982, 1993, 1994, 3 (2004, Para 50, Para 47, 48, 1979, 1994, 2007, 2012, 1979, 2024 25

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11005 OF2024(@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.17383/2024, APPELLANT(S, Court, BCCL, Technical, Technical, NIT, The Appellant-Banshidhar Construction Private Limited, the Judgment and Order, the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in Writ Petition (Civil) No.2896 of, the High Court, the Technical Bid Committee, Technical, BCCL, Coal India Limited, BCCL, BCCL/CMC/MDO-RS, Authority, BCCL, Board Resolution, Technical, Technical, NIT, Financial, BCCL, the High Court, High Court, Court, Notices, Respondents, Respondents, Court, the Tender Recommendation Committee, BCCL, Respondents, Appellant, the Appellant’s Technical, Appellant, NIT, The Technical, the Technical Bid Committee, Clause 10, NIT, Court, Government, the Public Trust Doctrine, Solicitor General, Tender Evaluation Committee, NIT, Executant, NIT, Bidders, Respondent no.8 - Company, the Tender Committee, the Audited Annual Reports, Committee, Counsels, Court, Court, Courts, Appellant Company, Appellant, Technical, Tender Summary Report, NIT, NIT, Technical, Financial, the Respondent No.8 Company, NIT, the Financial Capacity, Bidders, Indian Rupees, Indian Rupees, Paragraph 10, NIT, the Financial Capacity, Consortium, the Financial Capacity of the Consortium, Bidders, Bidders, the Bidder’s Covering Letter, UDIN, Financial Capacity, Bids, Consortium, Financial Capacity, the Net Worth of the Associate(s, Technical Capacity and/or, Financial Capacity, RFB, Consortium, RFB, RFB, the Indian Embassy, Bidders/, the Indian Embassy, DSC, DSC, DSC, NIT, Consortium, NIT, Important Documents, Certificate of Incorporation, Articles of Association, the Bidder/Members, the General Financial Rules, the Consolidated FDI Policy, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (FDI Policy Section, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India, Enclosure II Fund Transfer, RFB, NIT, NIT, Bidders, Financial, Financial Capacity, Bidders, the Audited Annual Reports, NIT, Technical, Technical, NIT, Technical, NIT, Technical, the Tender Evaluation Committee, Technical, Clause 10, NIT, Technical, the Appellant Company, the Clause 10, NIT, NIT, NIT, POA, POA, NIT, Technical, the Respondent BCCL, Technical, Technical, Clause 10, NIT, Bidders, Court, Respondents, Court, Government, Sterling Computers Limited, M/s. M & N Publications Limited, Court, State, Court, the North Wales Police v. Evans, State, the House of Lords, the North Wales Police v. Evans, Tata Cellular, Union of India2, Court, ABL International Limited, Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India Limited, State, Jagdish Mandal, State, Court, State, Mihan India Ltd., GMR Airports Ltd., Court, State, Respondents, Central Coalfields Limited, SLL-SML, Joint Venture Consortium, NIT, International Airport Authority of India, NIT, Tata Cellular, Tata Cellular v. Union of India, Jagdish Mandal, Michigan Rubber (India) Ltd., NIT, International Airport Authority of India, Court, Respondents, Infrastructure, Court, BCCL, Technical, Project

NORP: J.1, Eligibility, Tender, Tender, Tender, Tender

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent No.8, Appellant, Appellant’s, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Appellant, Appellant, Bidder, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

EVENT: Clause 10, Series, Clause 10

CARDINAL: 1 3, 06.05.2024, 2, 16.08.2023, 14.11.2023, 2, 29.11.2023.5, 6, two, 3, 7, 8, 13.11.2023, 14.11.2023, only 4, 700, 7, 14.11.2023, 13.11.2023, 10, 13.11.2023, 5, 1, 6, No.8, 29.11.2023, 7, two, 16.08.2023, 8 “10, three, 1, 9, 3, three, three, three, 3, three, 4, four, 10, 3, three, 11, 6.Any, Only one, 12, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 13 7, No.3, 3, 15, 16, 13.11.2023, 14.11.2023, 14.11.2023, 18, 144a, 94, 1, 1, 1, 6, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 53, 3, 26, two, 22, 50, 47, 6, 8, 14, 8, one, 24

LOC: BASTACOLLA, Amalgamated East Bhuggatdih, Respondent

PERSON: Lalti Devi, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Prasad, Wednesbury, Prasad, Tushar Mehta, Anupam Lal Das, Vikramjit Banerjee, Balbir Singh, Vehicle, Counsels, Lalti Devi, Bidder, Bidder’s Copy, Bid, Annex III, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Bidder, Criteria Scanned, Bidder, Affidavit, Bidder, Appendix II, Appendix III, Lalti Devi, Wednesbury, Counsels, Ramana Dayaram, Ramana Dayaram Shetty, SCC517, Ramana Dayaram, Ramana Dayaram Shetty, Counsels, Mega, Mega, J.[BELA M. TRIVEDI].

GPE: 07.05.2024, 09.04.2024, 01.12.2023, 07.05.2024, 07.05.2024, upon.3, the Hague Convention, Documents, 01.12.2023, Orissa, Others4, action.27, Orissa, Michigan, Karnataka, NEW DELHI

WORK_OF_ART: the Writ Petition, the Request For Bid (, Appellant, The Power Of, 3 All ER141, 3 All ER141

TIME: 29.11.2023 i.e.

FAC: the Column ‘Remarks, the Net Worth of the Bidder

ORDINAL: 15th

PERCENT: 14 SCC5175(2022