M/s Devtree Corp Llp. Vs. M/s Bhumika North Gardenia,

Decided On : Jul-24-2024

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 21 of the Act of, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 52, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 8(1, the Constitution Bench, Section 8, this Constitution Bench, the Arbitration Act, Section 7, the Arbitration Act, Section 2(1)(h, Section 7 of the Arbitration Act, Section 7, Section 7, Constitution, Section 2(1)(h, Section 7 of the Act, Section 9, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8(1, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 8 of the Act, Section 9, Section 52 of the Act of, Section 9, Section 52, Section 9, Section 52 of the Act of 1882, Section 52 of the Act of, Section 9, Section 52 of the Act of, Section 3 of the Act of 1882, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9.28, Section 9, Section 9, Section 8, Section 8(1, Section 11

CARDINAL: 1, 4TH, 12TH, 9, 3 2, 1996.4, 4, 17.05.2023, 5, 28.11.2023, 02.01.2024, 65, 16.10.2020, 8, 9, two, 1, 170.9, 230.4, 170.1, 170.2, 170.3, 11 170.9, 230.4, 8, 8, 13, 16.10.2020, 1, 1, 1996.8, 1, 14, 16.10.2020, transferee, 15, 16.10.2020, 16, 1996.18, 19, 52.Transfer, 18, 19, 21, three, 4, 2013)6, three, 1, 16.10.2020, 25

DATE: 2024, 1996, 1996, JULY, 2024, 1996, 1996, 1996, 31.07.2023, 1996, 20.12.2023, 27.01.2024, 15.04.2024, 1996, 1996, 1882, 20.12.2023, 1996, 2024, 170.2170.3, 45, 45, Section 2(1)(h, 1996, 1210, 1882, 1882, 1996, 1882, 1996, 2025, 3 2006, 2016, 5 2022, 2021, 45 days, 15.04.2024, 15.04.2024, 45 days

PERSON: ANU SIVARAMAN, UDAY HOLLA, C.K.NANDA KUMAR, ANU SIVARAMAN, Rs.80.00 lakhs, Sri Udaya Holla, Sri C.K. Nandakumar, Cox, Cox, Cox, Cox, REALTORS, BRAHMAPUTRA REALTORS, OTHERS6, Bengaluru Rural, Sd/-, Sd/-

ORG: No.2978 OF2024(AA, LIMITED LIABILTY PARTNERSHIP A COMPANY, ADV, M/S BHUMIKA NORTH GARDENIA, NO.435, BALAJI GOKULA, MAIN, MAHALAKSHMIPURA, ADV, MFA, U/S371)(b, BENGALURU, U/SEC, Rs.80.00, Section 9 Court, Section 9 Court, Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Cox and Kings Limited Vs SAP India Private Limited, the Hon'ble Apex Court, the "Group of Companies, the "Group of Companies Doctrine, Apex Court, No.17 of the, the Group of Companies, Bench, No.170.1, the Group of Companies, supra.12, the “Group of Companies, the Supreme Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal.16, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Court, the State of Jammu, the Central Government, Court, Court, force.20, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, SHONEY SANIL Vs Coastal Foundations, P) Ltd & Ors.3, Kerala High Court, Kerala High Court, G G TRANSPORT, the Gauhati High Court, SHONEY SANIL, MASHREQ BANK PSC Vs INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, Cox and Kings, Court, Section 9 Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Section 9 Court, Arbitral, Court, Arbitral, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal

GPE: Chloro, Chloro, No.170.2, No.170.3, India, AA.No.15001/2023, AA.No.15001/2023, AA.No.15001/2023, AA No.15002/2024

PRODUCT: SCC64110

NORP: Indian

TIME: No.170.9

ORDINAL: first, third, third

LOC: Kashmir, V Additional District