Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sri. N Umesha Vs. Smt. Bhagyamma @ Bhagamma

Decided On : Jun-14-2024

Court : Karnataka

LAW: the Central Amendment of 2005, the Hindu Succession Act, Section 21(2, Section 21(2, article 227, Article 226 or Article 227, Article 226, Article 226 of Constitution, Section 22-E(1, Section 22E(4, Article 226 of the constitution of, article 226 of the constitution, Article 226 of Constitution, Hindu Succession Act, Section 6, the Hindu Succession Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2 3, R4, 3, No.4, 3, No.4, 4, 3, No.4, 3, 16.06.2007, No.4, 3, No.4, half, 5, 3, 3, No.4, 3, No.4, 6, No.4, No.4, one, P16, No.2, 7, 4, No.4, 88, 3, No.4, 9, No.4, 10, No.4, one, 11, 4, 3, 13, No.4, 14, 17, two, 18, 19, 20, 2, one, 21, 22, No.4, 23, 3, No.4, No.4, 3, 3, No.4, 24, No.4, No.4, 25, 3, only 37, 20, 18, 26, 3, 27, No.4, 28, 3, 9, 9, 641, 29, 30, 31, 32, 3, 3

DATE: 2024, R1 - R3, 29.06.2007, 1997, M.R.No.5/1986-87, 1211, 1997, the year 2007, the year 2008, 2020, 4 May, 1951, 1616, 2012, 18, No.4 i.e., 29.06.2007, the year 1986-87, 2020, 2023, 1956, 1994, 1994, M.R.No.5/1986-87, 33, 3424

PERSON: H.P. SANDESH R.S.A., SRI N.UMESHA S/O SRI NARAYANAPPA, JMFC, Nagappa, lok-adalath, Nagappa, Narayanappa, Nagappa, Nagappa, Nagappa, Nagappa, Nagappa, Chintapanti Ramarao V/s Lok Adalat, Andra Pradesh High Court, Seogeni Rai, Kothakapu Muthyam Reddy, Sri, V.Ramachandra Rao, Lok-Adalath, Lok Adalat, Nagappa, Vineeta Sharma’s, Karnataka Amendment.22, Vineeta Sharma’s, Narayanappa, Nagappa, Nagappa, Nagappa, Narayanappa, Nagappa, Narayanappa, Nagappa

ORG: PAR, POST, RAO, SMT, BHAGYAMMA, SMT, RADHAMMA W/O SRI GIRISH, KADUR TALUK, SMT, THAYAMMA W/O SRI HANUMANTHAPPA, POST, SMT, POST, CPC, DECREE, ON THE FILE OF THE PRL, TARIKERE, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, away.6, The Trial Court, The Trial Court, the Trial Court, the First Appellate Court, the Trial Court, The First Appellate Court, the Trial Court, Court, the Trial Court, the First Appellate Court, Court, the Legal Services Authorities Act, M.R, Contra, Court, Court, Court, Legal Services Authorities Act, Court, Court, The Andra Pradesh High Court, Tiruvuru Constituted, State of Punjab V/s, Court, Court, Apex Court, Bishundeo Narain, Court, Court, the High Court of Hyderabad, V/s Bhargavi Constructions, The Hyderabad High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Emphasis, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The Trial Court, The Trial Court, No.118/1P6, Court, Court, the Trial Court, First Appellate Court, The Trial Court, the Trial Court, Apex Court, Prasanta Kumar Sahoo, V/s Charulata Sahoo, Apex Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, Succession, Sd/-

NORP: CHIKKAMAGALURU, CHIKKAMAGALURU, CHIKKAMAGALURU, CHIKKAMAGALURU, CHIKKAMAGALURU

GPE: S.D., Singh, India, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, India, Lok Adalat, Lok Adalat, redressal.19

ORDINAL: second, second, second, second, second, second, 1st, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, third, 3rd, 3rd, first, 2nd, 2nd

PRODUCT: No.1, Jagernath, Managing, No.1

LOC: ½, ½, ½, ½, ½, ½, ½, ½

FAC: the Lok-Adalat, the Lok Adalath, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat

PERCENT: 1951 AIR280

QUANTITY: 62/2E-P3, No.100/5 1 acre

WORK_OF_ART: The Second Appeal

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //