Sri. N Bharath Reddy Vs. Sri. C Sunil Kumar

Decided On : Oct-06-2023

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 156(3, Section 156(3, Right to Information Act, section 156(3, Section 420, Section 420, the Section 154, Sectin 156(3, Section 2, Section 465, Section 463, Section 468, Section 471, Section 406, Section 405, Section 405, Section 482, Section 156(1, Section 155(2, Section 155(2, Section 482, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 482, Article 226 of the Constitution need, Section 482, Section 406IPC, Section 200 of the Code, Sections 420 and 471IPC, Section 120-BIPC, Section 405IPC, Section 406IPC.18, Section 420, Section 471IPC, Section 471IPC, Section 470, Section 464IPC, Act 10 of 2009, Section 51(e, Section 470, Section 470, Section 471IPC, Section 471IPC, Section 120-BIPC, Section 120-AIPC, Section 405, Section 138, the NI Act, Section 204 of the Code, Section 200 of the Code, Section 202 of the Code by Act 25 of 2005, Section 482, Section 482, the Income Tax Act, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482, Article 226, Chapter XIV, Article 226 or, Section 482, Section 156(1, Section 155(2, Section 155(2, Section 203, Section 156(3, Section 482, Section 482

CARDINAL: 1, 103, 2, 103, 3, 103, 2, 103, 2, 156(3, 420, 465, 468, 471, 406, 114, 182, 191, 192, 5, 3, 420, 465, 468, 471, 406, 114, 182, 191, 192, 4 to 6, 2, 3 to 6, 5, 4, 5, 6, 5, 6, 1, 2, No.5, No.5, 23-12-2002, 5, 4 to 6, 4 to 6, 4 to 6, 4 to 6, 6, 8, 9, 4 to 6, 4, No.35/3, No.4, 2 SCC1, 10, 7, 6, 3, 4, 6, 11, 3, 3, No.2, 3, 4 to 6, 4, 6, 1, 8, 8, 6, 04.08.2012, 129, 8, 6, 17.07.2021, 12, 465, 468, 471, 406, 114, 182, 191, 192, 14, No.1 to 8, 465, 468, 471, 406, 114, 182, 191, 192, 15, 16, 3.3, 1 04.06.2001, 17, 2 04.06.2001, 3 16.03.2002, 5.15, About 18, 2.24, 15, 465, 471, 465, 1, 19, 438[or, 463, 20, 406, 420, 406, 420, 406, 21, 415, 405, 22, 23, 9, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 5, 7, 25, 6, two, 5, 26, 869, 27, 15, 3, 11, 2, 405, 420, 471, 120, 19, 420, 471, 120, 1, 16, 2, 361, 4, 2, 687, 5, 19, 29, 406, 405, 30, 1, 2, 8, 3, 31, 6,37,252.16p, 1, 3, 8, 3, 929, 464, 471, 33, 8, 3, 929, 464, 470, 464, 27-10, 34, 2, 79,752, 30-3-2013, 2, 11-4-2012, 2, 2, 4, 21, 31, 2, 420, 471, 2, 420, two, 420, 13, 2, 13, 2, 2, 828, 2, 713, 5, 12, 1, 38, 14 SCC638, 1, 479, 3, 2, 192, 2, 828, 2, 713, 39, 2, 828, 2, 713, 12, 1, 124, 1, 426, 40, 13, 102, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, two, 191, 45, 46, one

DATE: OCTOBER, 2023, THIS DAY, 2022, 120B, 23-12-2002, 6, No.4, the years 1993 to 1997, 2002, 2006, the year 2005- 2006.4, the year 2019, the year 2012, the 1st, the year 2002, 04-08-2012, 06-08-2012, the year 2012, today, the last 10 years, 10 years, the 1st, the year 2020, 2006, 23-12-2002, 9 years, 12-08-2021, 04-08-2012, 2014, 25-10-2021, about 4 months, 24-02-2022, 04-08-2012, 04.08.2012, 04.08.2012, 06-08-2012, 2012-13, No.7, No.7, 04-08-2012, 06-8-2012, a span of two days, 6, 29.03-2006, 29.03.2006, 15/07/2021, 15.07.2021, 11, 13 154(3, 12.08.2021, 12.08.2021, 14, 1973, 1860, the year 2012, the year 2012, the year 2020, 06-08-2012, 28.05.2021, the year 2012, the year 2022 clearly 10 years, the year 2012 i.e., 04-08-2012, the year 2012, about 10 years, 1ST, 10 years, 1813, two years, seven years, 2000, 2000, ten years, seven years, three years, 10 years, three years, seven years, the year 2020, 2022, 14 years, 1992, 1 2023, 2004, 2022, 2023, 2019, 2020, 2015, 2015, 1998, three years, three years, 2009, 2009, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2009, 32, 2009, 2009, the year 2017, four years, 53,215 35, 36, the year ending 2016, 1,93,776, 2011, 2012, 2011, 2012, motion.30, 2019, 16, 2020, 2020, 1998, 2015, 2016, 2014, 2015, 2017, 2017, 2019, 16, 2020, 2020, 2019, 16, 2020, 2020, 2015, 2016, 1992, 10 years, 06-08-2012, 28-02-2022, quashed.14, 1992, 42, 4317, eight years, many centuries, daily, years, 2022

PERSON: JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA, SRI N.SURYANARAYANA, GANDHINAGAR BALLARI - 583, SRI T.HANUMAREDDY, Nos, Kukunoor Taluk, Nos, Nos, Nos, N.Deva Reddy, Heard Sri Ravi Varma, Sri T.Hanumareddy, Sri V.S. Kalasurmath, Sri Ravi Varma, N.Gangamma, N.Gangamma, N.Gangamma, Nos, LALITA KUMARI v. GOVERNMENT, nature.10, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Sale Deed, Complainant, Lawful, Complainant, Complainant, Accused No.1, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Accused No.1, Accused No.1, Accused No.4 to, Yelburga, Complainant, Accused No.1, Complainant, Complainant, Accused No.1, Complainant, Accused No.1 to 4, Accused No.2, Complainant, Accused, Gandhinagar P.S., Document No.10, Jurisdictional, Sri, Suryanarayana Reddy, No.374B, Siraguppa Taluk, Siraguppa Taluk, Ballari 4 F.Y.1995-96, No.35/3, micor, Haryana, Bhajan Lal, Supp, Nos, Bhajan Lal, Golconda Linga Swamy, Bench, Kapur v. State of Punjab, Cri LJ1239 this Court, Shubhankar P. Tomar, Sakshi Tilak Chand, Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel, SCC, Sudhir Shantilal Mehta, Shubhankar P. Tomar, Sakshi Tilak Chand, Section 420IPC, Mohd, Ibrahim v. State of Bihar, Mohd, Ibrahim v. State of Bihar, IPC, Mohd, Ibrahim v. State of Bihar, IPC, 470IPC, Manav Rachna International, Manav Rachna International, Manav Rachna International, raised.27, 471IPC, K.M. Johny, K.M. Johny, K.M. Johny, Birla Corpn., SCC, Mehmood Ul Rehman, Khazir Mohammad Tunda, Vijay Dhanuka, Abhijit Pawar v. Hemant Madhukar Nimbalkar, Birla Corpn, Birla Corpn., JIPL, Birla Corpn., Birla Corpn., Mehmood Ul Rehman, Mehmood Ul Rehman, Khazir Mohammad Tunda, R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab, Haryana, Bhajan Lal, Supp, SCC, gross delay.16, Haryana, Bhajan Lal, Golconda Linga, Hasmukhlal D. Vora v. State, Tamil Nadu, Mahavir, Gautam Buddha, Mahatma Gandhi, Roy Sahara v. Union, Bald

ORG: SRI N.BHARATH REDDY S/O SRI N.SURYANARAYANA, SMT, N.SUVARNA W/O N.SURYANARAYANA REDDY AGED ABOUT63YEARS R, SRI C.SUNIL, DHARWAD, RAJKUMAR, HCGP FOR R2, U/SEC, U/SEC, Court, the Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, CrPC, IPC, M/s Sree Raghavendra Enterprises and M/s Indian Minerals and Granite Company, Income Tax, the Income Tax Department, General Power, GPA, General Power, Magistrate, CrPC, Court, the Legislative Assembly, High Court Government Pleader, Court, GPA, No.37/1, No.37/1, Magistrate, the Income Tax Department, Smt, GPA, Smt, Court, GPA, GPA, GPA, GPA, the Apex Court, U.P., GPA, the Income Tax Dept., Ballari, the Schedule Property, Schedule Property, Registrar, the Schedule Property, Schedule Property, GPA, GPA, GPA, GPA, GPA, Accused No.5, the Schedule Property, GPA, GPA, the Sub-Registrar, GPA, Sub-Registrar, Accused No.5, GPA, Schedule Property, GPA, GPA, the Accused No.5 N. Suryanarayana Reddy, Accused No.5, GPA, GPA, Ballari, Gandhinagar Police Station, SHO, NCR, SHO, Gandhinagar Police Station, U/s, Gandhinagar Police Station, Complaint, Ballari, Gandhinagar Police Station, Complaint, Hon'ble Court, Jurisdictional Gandhinagar Police Station, Emphasis, No.37/1, Income Tax, Magistrate, IPC, Gandhi Nagar Police Station, C.J & JMFC, Emphasis, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, GPA, Court, GPA, GPA, No.37/1, Kukanur Taluk, No.43(P, District The, No.37/1, GPA, IPC, Court, Court of Justice, the Information Technology Act, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, trust.—Whoever, IPC, IPC, IPC, Court, Court, Court, CrPC, the Apex Court, ALI, The Apex Court, FIR, FIR, FIR, Court, FIR, State, FIR, Magistrate, FIR, FIR, Magistrate, FIR, Court, CrPC, FIR, Court, FIR, FIR, FIR, Court, FIR, Court, Court, CrPC, State of Andhra Pradesh, Court, the High Court, FIR, Court, FIR, FIR, Court, AIR, the High Court, Emphasis, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, FIR, 04.06.2022, State, U.P., Emphasis, the Apex Court, ALI, Court, The Apex Court, GABA, JIPL, Magistrate, Sunil Bharti Mittal v., CBI, Pepsi Foods Ltd., Judicial Magistrate, IPC, IPC, trust.—Whoever, trust.—Whoever, Company, the Bank of Bengal, Bank of, Company, inter alia, CBI, JIPL, Iridium India Telecom Ltd., Motorola Inc., Court, Sections 415, JIPL, JIPL, Court, Sections 415, Sections 464, Manav Rachna International, Adhunik Colour Solutions, JIPL, GST, GST, VAT, JIPL, Reliance, JIPL, IPC, Sections of the IPC, JIPL, Sections, Court, Court, Thermax Ltd., Thermax Ltd., Thermax, Thermax Ltd., Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Adventz Investments & Holdings Ltd., Pepsi Foods Ltd., Pepsi Foods Ltd., Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Najima Mamtaj, Adventz Investments & Holdings Ltd., JIPL, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Andheri East, the High Court, Adventz Investments & Holdings Ltd., State, Emphasis, the Apex Court, the Income Tax Department, Court, The Apex Court, the High Courts, Court, the High Court, Court, State, Court, Court, FIR, Magistrate, FIR, FIR, Magistrate, FIR, State, A.P., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, the FIR No.33 of 2009, Ballygunge Police Station, Emphasis, the Apex Court, Magistrate, CrPC, CrPC, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Court, Magistrate, the Apex Court, CrPC, the Apex Court, ALI, JMFC, Ballari, CrPC, CT

ORDINAL: SECTION482OF, 1st, 1st, Thirdly, first, first, first, first, first, second, First, first, first

NORP: Ballari, Indian, Ballari, Ballari, DEEPAK, Indian, Indian

QUANTITY: 10 acres, 10 acres, 2.70 acres, 10.53 acres, 5 acres

GPE: Gavarala Village, United States of America, India, United States of America, Accused No.2, S.H.O, Cr, S.P., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., incident.11, Hosahalli Village, Hosahalli Village, Kanekoppa Village, Putthageri Village, grudge.12, toto.6, Saharanpur, Gujarat, Delhi, Mohd, Faridabad, Faridabad, Delhi, Delhi, Mumbai, Cr, P.C., the State of, Karnataka v. L. Muniswamy, P.C., Dalip, Singh v. State of, Subrata

FAC: Koppal District, Accused No.4, Accused No.4, Accused No.4, Accused No.4, Accused No.4, S.H.O Gandhinagar, S.H.O Gandhinagar, Gavaral Village, Sections 405, Police Station Mirzapur, Sections 470

PRODUCT: No.5, No.1, No.1, SCC42328, Respondent 2, Respondent 2, Respondent 2, Calcutta, Respondent 2, Respondent 2

WORK_OF_ART: a Sale Deed, the Accused Persons, The Code of Criminal Procedure, trust.***(f

LOC: WEST BENGAL3