Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited Vs. Union Of India

Decided On : Apr-21-2023

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 37A(1, Section 37A(3, the Companies Act, Section 37(1, Section 131, the Income Tax Act, Section 37A(1, Section 37A(1, Section 37A(3, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4 of the Act, Constitution, Section 37A of the Act, Section 37A, Section 37A(4, Article 19 of the Constitution of India, Section 20 37A, Section 37A of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 37A of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India?.16, Companies Act, the Companies Act, Article 14, Article 14, Article 19, Article 19(1, Article 21, Article 14, Article 21, Article 19, Article, Article 19, Article 19, Article 19, Article 14 or Article 21, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14, Article 19(1)(g, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19, Article 31(1, Article 14, Article 19(1)(f).17, Section 167(12A, Section 189, the Customs Act, Article 14, Section 52A, Article 19(1)(f, Article 19, Article 14, Article 19, Article 19(1)(f, Article 19, Article 14, Article 19, Article 19, Article 19, Article 14, Article 19(1)(g).19, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution.20, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14.36, Constitution, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution.38, Article 14, Article, Article 14, Article 14, Article 19 of the Constitution, Article 7 of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights, Article 14, Tamil Nadu Act, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution.50, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 19 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 52-A, Article 19, Article 31(1, Article 14, Article 19(1)(f, Article 31(1, Article 31(1, Article 19(1)(f, Article 14, Section 52-A, Article 19(1)(f, Section 52-A, Article 19, Article 14, Article 19, Article 19, Article 19, Section 52-A, Article 31(1, Section 52-A under, Article 19(1)(f, Section 52-A, Article 19(5, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Section 52-A of the Sea Customs Act, Constitution, Article 19(1)(f, Article 19, Article 19, Article 19(1)(d, Article 19, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Article 19 of the Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 37, Article 14, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Section 37A., Section 37A. Section, Section 4.—(1, section 4, Section 15, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Article 14, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Section 33-A, Section 33-A., Section 33, Section 33, Section 33-B. Such, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 19(1)(g, Section 33-A, Section 33-A, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19(6, Section 33-A., the Bombay Police Act, Section 33(1, the Bombay Prohibition Act, Rule 45, the Bombay Police Act, Section 33(1)(w, Regulations 238, the Bombay Police Act, Section 33-B, Section 33-A, Section 33-A, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19(6, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19(1)(g, the Income Tax Act, Article 19(1)(g, Circular 59, Section 83, the CGST Act, the State GST Act, Section 83, Section 83, Section 83, Section 83, Section 83, Section 83, Section 83, Section 83, Section 83, Section 83, Section 83, Section 45, Section 45, Section 45

CARDINAL: 1, 560, 103, 110 001, 2, 4, 560, 5, 3 6, 60, 600 001, 19, 21, 19, 20, 4, More than 1500, around 50,000, 5, 1,500, 6, one, 37(3, 1, one, 2022.5, 3, 4, 8, 01-10-2013, 1-04-2015, 97, 10, 5551,27,15,824/-, 29, 05-05-2022, 05-05-2022, 12, 29, 29, 19-09-2022, 5551,27,15,824/-, 12, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 6, 5, 4, 8, 6, 10, 13, 2, 2, 3, 16, 4, 19, 5, 21, 21, one, 22, 14, 2, 1, 3, 4, 23, 5, 6, 24, 25, 14, 1, 26, one, two, 28, 35, 29, two, one, 540-541, 30, five, 71, three, 2, 31, Two, One, 45, 48 to 50, 256-57, 48, two, 31-3-1975, two, two, 32, 1996)2, 33, 35, one, two, 34, 14, 21, 19, 14, 14, 2S, 14, 31, 31, 36, 21, 15, 19, 3, 95, 99, 101, two, 39, 1, 2, 3, 40, 4, 5, 6, 8), 9, 41, 9, 2, 3, 4, 1, 43, 1, 5, 6, 4, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 46, 87, three, 3, 47, 113, 33, 2, 609-10, 14, 48 114, one, 49 124, 1, 33, 3, 50, 1, 394, 412, 313, 51, 118, more than 75, more than 10, two, 75, 122, 123, 8, 573, 242, 241, 54, One, 1, 69, 2d 357, 452, 2, 3 WLR611, 3, 1, 55, 69, 2d 357, 452, 2, 3 WLR611, 3, over 75,000, 56, 9, 1, 57, 1, 195, 269, 207, four, 58, 7, four, four, 1, 3, three-fold, three, 2, 2, four, No.2, No.2, 3, 225.1, 6-4-2018, 6-4-2018, 5, one, 31, 30, 60, 53, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 61, 6, two, 62, 63, 1, 1, one, 26

DATE: APRIL, 2023, 2013, 1950, 20, 1950, THIS DAY, 1999, 2013, 7-10-2014, the month of February, 2022, 4-01-2022, 1961, February 2022, 25-02-2022, 08th March, 2010, 2013-14, 01-04-2017, 2016, 29-04-2022, 29th April 2022, 1974, 1980, 1960, 14 (ii, OTHERS7, 2017, 2009, 1981, 2013, 2021, 2020, 2021, 2008, 1969, 1996, 2010, the year 2015, 21 2007, 22 2022, 23 2018, 1994, 2022, 13-07-2022, 21, 1956, 19, 21, 21, 16, 19, 19, 1878, 1948, 1996, 1986, 1986, 46, 47, 1986, 1974, 1949, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1986, 19, 14, 14, CO.LTD, 1878, 19, 31, para-14, 16, the year 2015, February 28, 2015, the last nine months, the last nine months, the last 9 months, October, 2014, 10 years, up to 7 years, 1999, up to five years, 2015, 2015, a period of, thirty days, one hundred eighty days, one hundred eighty days, at least thirty days, 30 days, 180 days, 1996, a little earlier, 2007, 2 SCC1, 1981, three years, 1981, 1986, centuries, at least a century and a half, 1960, 1978, 1951, 1949, 1953, 1951, 1948, 1888, 1962, 1888, 1960, 1951, 1949, 1953, 52, 1951, 1960, 1951, 2005, 1995, 2004, 11, 1962, 1961, 1961, 1995, 2004, 11, 1962, 1961, 1961, 2005, 1952, 1972, 1969, 1961, the centuries, 2016, 1999, 1998, 2007, 2007, 2007, 2014, 2013, 2019, 6866, 2019, 49, 2003, 2015, 2015

PERSON: JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA, MARATHAHALLI, SRI HARPREET, ALTERNATIVELY, Xiaomi H.K. Limited, Xiaomi H.K. Limited, Nitin Ajage, Manu Jain, Qualcomm, Qualcomm, Qualcomm, Qualcomm, Xiaomi, Qualcomm, Heard Sri Udaya Holla, Sri Harpeet Singh, Radhika V., Sri Mithel Reddy, Sri Madhukar Deshpande, Sri Udaya Holla, KHAN CHAND v., KHAN CHAND2, SCC54913, CHARLES K.SKARIA, C. MATHEW, EBRAHIM VAZIR, M.G. ABROL, OTHERS6, H.E.H., SHIVHARE, JASJIT SINGH, Articles 14, Articles 14, Articles 14, Scheduled Tribe, Articles 19(1)(a, Articles, Articles 14, Articles 15, Basheshar Nath v. Commissioner, SC149, Venugopal, Jasjit Singh, Choudhary, Articles 14, Justice Frankfurter, Wade, Bench, Bench, K.R. Lakshmanan v. State of, LAKSHMANAN V. STATE, Articles 14, Art, Art, Art, Art, Articles 14, Articles 14, Articles 14, Articles 14, Grundnorm, Shri Narendra Modi, Kuch, khilaye humne, hai Mushkil, kaante kai, A. Measures, F. Stand, Bench, Articles 14 to 21, Fertilizer Corpn, AIR1981SC344, Shubhada Chaukar, Municipal Corpn, Maneka Gandhi, Rohatgi, Dr Dhavan, Reasons, Cinemas, Licence, Reasons, Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat, Subramanium, Mohd, Yasin, Mohd, Yasin, Mohd, Huang v. Secy, Huang v. Secy, Mellat, Mellat, Hon'ble M.R. Shah, J., Realtor v. State, Realtor v. State, Realtor, Realtor v. State

ORG: XIAOMI TECHNOLOGY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY INCORPORATED, A/W SRI ADITYA VIKRAM BHAT, SRI DEEPAK CHOPRA, ADVOCATES, UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE GOVERNMENT OF, BENGALURU, BENGALURU, BENGALURU, TTMC K.H.ROAD, BENGALURU, FEMA, RAJAJI SALAI CUSTOM HOUSE CHENNAI, FEMA, INFRINGING, FEMA AS INFRINGING, FEMA, ETC, THIS WRIT PETITION HAVING BEEN HEARD, Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited, Court, the Foreign Exchange Management Act, Private Limited Company, the Board of Directors, the petitioner/ Company, Private Limited Company, Xiaomi Singapore Private Limited, Xiaomi, Zhuhai Xiaomi Communication Company Limited, Customs Department, COVID-19, Directorate of Enforcement, Company, Company, the Directorate of Enforcement, Directorate of Enforcement, Income Tax Department, Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Tech Inc., Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Company Limited, Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Tech Inc., Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Company Limited, Qualcomm Inc., Qualcomm Technologies Inc., Qualcomm, LTE, The Subscriber Unit License Agreement, Xiaomi Inc., Xiaomi Communications Co. Limited, Qualcomm Inc., Xiaomi Communications Co. Limited, Xiaomi Inc., Xiaomi Corporation, Qualcomm Inc., Xiaomi Communications Co. Ltd., Xiaomi Corporation, Qualcomm Inc., Xiaomi Inc./Xiaomi Technology Co. Ltd., Xiaomi Communications Co. Ltd., Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Co. Ltd., Xiaomi, Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Company Limited, Xiaomi, Beijing Xiaomi Mobile Software Company Limited, the Directorate of Enforcement, Company, Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited, the Directorate of Enforcement, Directorate of Enforcement, Court, Court, Court, Sri Aditya Vikram Bhat, Sri Deepak Chopra, Additional Solicitor General, Act, OTHERS3, AMICHAND VALLAMJI5, Act, BANO, UNION OF INDIA, SRINIVASA RESORTS LIMITED, MOBILE ASSOCIATION OF, RESERVE BANK OF INDIA11, the Directorate of Enforcement, Reliance, NIZAM, Additional Solicitor General, Additional Solicitor General, DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, PRADESH POWER CORPORATION LIMITED, TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA, Additional Solicitor General, the Apex Court, CHOUDHARY, Additional Solicitor General, Legislature, the Delhi High Court, J.SEKAR v. UNION OF INDIA23, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, PRINCIPAL, INCOME-TAX, 05.05.2022, Court, petition.14, Additional Solicitor General, Court, Additional Solicitor General, Act, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, tandem, the Apex Court, The High Court, THOMSON-Csf, NATIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Indo China Steam Navigation Co. Ltd., Additional Collector of Customs Calcutta, S. 52A, NAA, State, State, State, State, Consortium, State, Court, The Supreme Court, the United States Constitution, Consortium, inter alia, Courts, State, State, Emphasis, the Apex Court, Court, T.N., T.N., Court, Court, Club, the State of Tamil Nadu, the State Government, Court, Court, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Court, the State Government, Government, the Apex Court, the Power Corporation, Emphasis, The Apex Court, Court, Court, Allahabad High Court, the Apex Court, Act, Finance, Budget Speech, Parliament, the NDA Government, hai 38, Government, Swachch, the Revenue Department, the Settlement Commission, the Prevention of Money-laundering Act, The Foreign Exchange Management Act, FEMA, Emphasis, the Central Government, the Competent Authority, the Central Government, the Government of India, The Competent Authority, the Directorate of Enforcement, the Competent Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, the Competent Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, the Directorate of Enforcement, the Competent Authority, the Appellate Tribunal, Emphasis, Emphasis, the Competent Authority, Joint, Government of India, The Competent Authority, Section 37A. The Competent Authority, the Directorate of Enforcement, the Competent 45 Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, the Competent Authority, the Appellate Tribunal, The Apex Court, The Apex Court, McDowell, A.P. v. McDowell and Co., State, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, The Preamble of the Constitution of India, Court, Sections 33-A, State, Court, State, Court, State, State, Sections 33-A, Court, SCC20, inter alia, the High Court, State, The High Court, Court, The High Court, the High Court, the Statement of Objects, The Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, The Bombay Police Act, Controlling Places of Public Entertainment, Controlling Places of Public Amusement, the Bombay Shops and Establishment Act, the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, the Maharashtra Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, the Amusement Rules, the Bombay Police Act, Entertainment Rules, the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, the Bombay Police Act, State, the Statement of Objects, the Bombay Police Act, Reliance, State, Khoday Distilleries Ltd., Modern Breweries Ltd., Bellanca, State, Court, Khoday Distilleries Ltd., Modern Breweries Ltd., New York State Liquor Authority, State, The Apex Court, The Apex Court, MOBILE ASSOCIATION OF INDIA, Reliance, Court, Town Area Committee, Town Area Committee, Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India, Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India, Court, State of M.P., State, Sections 269-SS, RBI, RBI, Circular, Modern Dental College & Research Centre, Modern Dental College & Research Centre, Court, Circular, the Privy Council, Elloy de Freitas, Permanent Secy, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands & Housing, Elloy de Freitas, Permanent Secy, Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands & Housing, De Freitas, the House of Lords, State, State, the Supreme Court, Treasury, Treasury, Circular, Emphasis, the Apex Court, the Reserve Bank of India, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, RADHA KRISHAN, the High Courts, the High Court, Valerius Industries v. Union of India, Valerius Industries v. Union of India, The High Court, Commissioners, the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, the Gujarat High Court, the Government Revenue

MONEY: 027, 027, 027, 027

QUANTITY: 3 . MR.SOMASHEKAR N.

PRODUCT: VIRES, Act, QB245, QB245, Proportionality 193, VC, AC700

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, PUNJAB, contra, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, D., Swiss, Joint, Muslim, American, Rules, Similar, Punjab, R., Punjab, R.

GPE: India, India, India, USA, China, Qualcomm, USA, China, China, India, India, China, India, Sri M.B.Nargund, MAVAT, BOMBAY, OTHERS4, China, India, 03.10.2022, India, Beijing, China, India, India, India, the People’s Republic of China, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Delhi, Delhi, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, England, K.R., Lakshmanan v. State of, Parasaran, Parasaran, K.R., India, India, India, India, Art, Art, Art, Art, India, India, hai, India, Switzerland, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, I.R., the City of Ahmedabad, Narendra, Gujarat, Bombay, Karnataka, SCC26, New York State Liquor Authority, Mumbai, Jalalabad, Jalalabad, Mohd, Faruk, Faruk, United Kingdom, Gujarat, Gujarat, Gujarat

ORDINAL: third, third, 3rd, second, 2nd, 6th, first, first, third, first, third, first, first, third, first, first, first, first, fourth, first, second, third, fourth, fifth

WORK_OF_ART: Qualcomm, G.J.Fernandez (Supra, Preamble

LOC: OTHERS9, Maharashtra

PERCENT: 9 SCC17, 300%

EVENT: SCC77218 2022 SCC OnLine SC126217 (, the 1949 Act, the 1949 Act, The Bombay Prohibition Act

FAC: the Administrative Law, POWER MEASUREMENT LIMITED, Laxmi Khandsari

TIME: under this Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //