Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Mr. Mohammed Shameer Vs. State Of Karnataka
Decided On : May-10-2022
Court : Karnataka
LAW: Order 39 Rule 3(a, Section 482, Chapter XIV, Article 226 or, Section 482, Section 156(1, Section 155(2, Section 155(2, Section 482, Section 307, Section 307, Section 498A, Section 354, Section 307, Appellant 1, Section 498-A of the Penal Code, Section 498-A, Section 498-A, the Dowry Prohibition Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act.28, Section 498-A, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 498-A, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 498-A, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 156(3, Section 156(3, section 498A, Section 498-A, Section 498A, Section 498-A, Section 323, Section 482, Section 482, Section 482
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3RD, 1ST, 2ND, 3, 504, 506, 307, 313, 354, 114, 504, 307, 313, 323, 354, 114, 34, 1961.2, No.3, No.8, 12-12-2020, 15.03.2021.4, 6, 504, 307, 313, 323, 354, 114, 34, 504,307, 313, 323, 354, 114, 34, 23-12-2021, 7, two, 8, 9, 10, 11, 18.03.2021, 3, 3, 10-2-2020, 4, 10-12-2020, 12, 3£ÉÃ, 24, 5, 12, 14, 1, 11-2020, ºÀt, 10, 11-11-2020, ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀiÁV, ºÉZÀÄÑ, ºÉÆÃzÁUÀ, 3, ºÉÆgÀUÀqÉ, ºÉÆÃzÀ£ÀÄ, ºÁUÀÆ, £ÁåAiÀÄ, 17, 2, 1/3, 1, 2, about 18, 17, ºÀt, 5, 2020gÀAzÀÄ, 5, ºÀt, J1, 3, ¨ÉÊzÁr, 10, ºÀt, ºÀt, ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀiÁV, ºÉZÀÄÑ, ¢£À, 10, 3, 323, 504, 506, 307, 504, 313, 114, 34, 323, 504, 313, 114, 34, 4, 504, 313, 354, 114, 34, 504, 114, 34, 20, 2, one, 7, 102, 1, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 23, 6, 2, 3, 307, 313, 354, 25, 27, 28, 7, 29, one, 25, 4, 10, 498, 31, 498, 3/4, two, 32, 18, 14, 6, 5, 1, 426, 5, 15, 5, 935, 16, 3, 24, 3/4, 3/4, 3/4, one, 11, 14, 4, 36, 32, one, 37, 21, 3, 6, 39, 01.04.19, one, 40, 01.04.19, two, two, 42, 34, 43, 12, 7, 10
DATE: 2022, THIS DAY, 2021, 2021, 498A, No.2, No.4, the 1st, No.6, 5 8th, 24-10-2020, the 1st, 2020, 08-03-2021, the 1st, 2021, 20-03-2021, the 1st, 2021, 18-06-2021.5, 2021, 498A, 1961, 10-12-2021, 498A, 1961, the 1st, few weeks, 80 years old, 24-10-2020, the 1st, 04-03-2021, 08-03-2021, the first week of February 2021, 15.03.2021, The next day, the 1st, 5-2010, 5-2010, 16/04/2021, the 1st, 2021, 18-06-2021, 1314, JAzÀÄ ºÉý aQvÉìPÉÆlÄÖ, 14-12-2020, 04-01-2021, ºÀjºÀgÀzÀ, 04-03-2021, 22-08-2021, ºÀjºÀgÀzÀ, 2021, the 1st week of February 2021, 22-08-2021, 22-08-2021, 22-08-2021, 22-08-2021, 24-10-2020, ºÉýzÁUÀ ¸ÁQë-4, 2020, 22-08-2021, 7899463679, J7-498(J, J8-498(J, 22-08-2021, 22.08.2021, 2117, 1988, 1992, 2418, No.4, No.4, the 1st, 80 years old, the last 7 years, the 1st, the 1st, 10 years, the 1st week of February 2021, 22-08-2021, 2620, more than seven years, 2010, three years, a few days, 2012, 2018, 2019, paras 5, 1992, 2019, 2000, 2014, 2015, A few months, November 2013, recent years, decades, a few days, 2000, 38, years, years, the year 2019, 11.12.17.21, 4122, 80 year old, 2010, 1961, 4526, 2021
PERSON: JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA, MOHAMMED MUNNEER S, JMFC, Hashmath Pasha, Sri B.J.Rohith, Khata, Kandayam, Defendant No.1, Defendant No.4, Order, Order, T.I. Order, J¸ï, DzÀ, ¨Á¥ÀÆf ¨ÁåAPï ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ ¨sÀªÀ£ÀzÀ, zÉÊ»PÀªÁV §¼À¹PÉÆArzÀÝ£ÀÄ, ÀAvÀgÀ, zÉÊ»PÀ ¸ÀA¥ÀPÀð ºÉÆA¢gÀĪÀ, ©Ãgï, ¦, UÁqÉæÃeï ©, CAzÀgÉ 24-10-2020, LzÀÄ ®, JAzÀÄ vÀPÀgÁgÀÄ vÉUÉzÀÄ, GAlÄ ªÀiÁrzÀÝgÀÄ, ¤SÁ:ªÀ£ÀÄß vÀqÀªÁV CAzÀgÉ ªÀÄzsÁåºÀß, CAzÀgÉ ¢£ÁAPÀ:01, QüÀÄ eÁwAiÀĪÀ¼ÀÄ, ¦Ãr¸ÀÄwÛzÀÄÝ F «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß £, ¸ÀĪÀÄä£É CªÀ£ÀÄ, JAzÀÄ §®, ªÀAvÀ ªÀiÁr E®, AiÀiÁªÀÅzÉÃ, ÀjÃQë¹, ºÀ¯Éè ªÀiÁr, DzÀ, zÁªÀtUÉgÉAiÀÄ J¸ï, J¸ï, Á¢¤AiÀĪÀgÀÄ, MrØ eÉÆÃgÁV, zÀÆj£À Cfð ¤ÃrzÀÄÝ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ, ªÀiÁr Hl, °è, ¦ªÀůÁè, FvÀ£À, DqÀðgï, ÀAvÀgÀ, ªÀÄzsÁåºÀß, J¸ï, ¯ÉÆÃ¥sÀgï ªÀÄÄAqÉ, MzÁÝqÀÄwÛzÉÝ, ¤£Àß fêÀ vÉUÉAiÀÄzÉ, ©Ãgï, husband/1st, A:12 gÀ, ¦vÀ£ÉÆA¢UÉ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß, ¨Á¥ÀÆf ¨ÁåAPï ¸ÀªÀÄÄzÁAiÀÄ ¨sÀªÀ£ÀzÀ, ªÀiÁrPÉÆnÖzÀÄÝ, ¦, §gÉ, ÀAvÀgÀ, ¦vÀ£ÁzÀ J1, J2, QüÀÄ eÁwAiÀĪÀ¼ÀÄ, J1 DgÉÆæ, J7, J8 gÀªÀjUÉ w½¹zÁUÀ J1, UÀAqÀ£ÁzÀ J4 gÀªÀjUÉ PÀĪÀÄäPÀÄÌ ¤qÀÄwÛzÀÝgÀÄ, J1 gÀªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ, ÀjÃPÉë, ªÉÊzÀågÀÄ ªÀÄÄlÄÖ ¤AwzÉ, J7 gÀªÀgÀÄ HlzÀ, ÀAvÀgÀ ªÀÄÄlÄÖ, zÁªÀtUÉgÉAiÀÄ J¸ï J¸ï, aQvÉìUÉ zÁR¯ÁVzÀÄÝ, ÀAvÀgÀ, EzÁÝUÀ J7 DgÉÆÃ, ¦, ÀAvÀgÀ, gÀªÀjUÉ J1, ÀA§gïUÉ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ, JAzÀÄ ºÉýgÀÄvÁÛ¼É. ¢£ÁAPÀ:22, ªÀÄzsÁåºÀß, gÀªÀgÀÄ J¸ïJ¸ï §qÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°, ¦, gÀªÀjUÉ ¤£Àß fêÀ vÉUÉAiÀÄzÉ, SCINDIA V. SAMBHAJIRAO CHANDROJIRAO ANGRE1, BHAJANLAL2, Bald, Surat, Appellant 2, Geeta Mehrotra, K. Subba Rao v. State of, Subba Rao v. State of, Haryana, Bhajan Lal, Haryana, Bhajan Lal, Supp, SCC, SCC35733, Kans Raj v. State, Chandra Agrawal, Chandra Agrawal, Nayan Chopra, Nayan Chopra, KAHKASHAN KAUSAR v. STATE, 498A IPC, Reasons, Geeta Mehrotra, G.V. Rao v. L.H.V. Prasad, K. Subba Rao v. The State of Telangana8, Appellants, GUPTA, KHAITAN
ORG: DISTRICT KARNATAKA.2, 4TH CROSS, MRS.KHAMAR TAJ W/O MOHAMMED MUNEER AGED, 4TH CROSS, BEGUM W/O MOHAMAD, 4TH CROSS, MUHAMAD SABEER S/O MAHAMMED MUNEER AGED ABOUT24YEARS R/A RAMDAS COMPOUND KOTWAL NAGAR, 4TH CROSS, AYISHA SIDDIKKA W/O MAHAMMED HARUN AGED ABOUT26YEARS R/, MAIN, MAIN, 3RD CROSS, HARIHARA, KHAN S/O LATE NASEER KHAN AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/AT2D MAIN, KARNATAKA, KARNATAKA, SMT, D.N., W/O MOHAMAD SHAMEER, SS, KARNATAKA, HCGP FOR R1, IPC, JMFC, IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the Vidyanagar Police, Davangere, NCR, Court, FIR, IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, Magistrate, Court, High Court Government, High Court Government Pleader, Court, Court, High Court Government Pleader, JMFC, The Civil Court, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Suit Schedule Property, Defendant No.1, Defendants, the Suit Schedule Property, Plaintiff, Affidavit, the Suit Schedule Property, Plaintiff, Court, Temporary Injunction, Plaintiff, the Suit Schedule Property, Plaintiff, CPC, Suit, Defendants, ªÁ¹, EªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ, CfÓ, Á¢¤ DAiÉÄõÁ ¹¢ÝÃQ, ºÁgÉÆãï EªÀgÀÄUÀ¼À, LzÀÄ ®, ªÀÄAZÀ, gÀÄ, ¨É¯É, CfÓ, zÉÊ»PÀªÁV, CfÓ, ªÁ¹ C¥sÉÆæÃeïSÁ£ï, ºÉÆÃzÀgÉ, ÀjÃvÀ, ªÀÄÄlÄÖ, CvÉÛ, JA§ «µÀAiÀÄ, CfÓ, è M¼ÀgÉÆÃVAiÀiÁV zÁR¯ÁV, EzÉ®, CfÓ, ªÉÄÊzÀÄ£À, PÉÊ, KPÉÊPÀ GzÉÝñÀ¢AzÀ CªÀgÀÄ, A¸ÉAiÀÄ£ÀÄß, CfÓ, ªÉÄÊzÀÄ£À, CªÁZÀå, ¥, CzÁzÀ, ¨Á¼À£ÀÄß ºÁ¼ÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃqÀ £, EµÀÖ«, eÉÆÃgÁV ªÀiÁwV½zÀÄ £Á£ÀÄ FUÁUÀ¯É, ÀzÉ, PÉÊPÁ®ÄUÀ½AzÀ, PÉÊ, DUÀ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ M¼ÀUÀqÉ CqÀÄUÉ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ, eÉÆÃgÁV PÀÆV £, F WÀl£É¬ÄAzÀ ddðjvÀUÉÆAqÀ £Á£ÀÄ £, UÀ, PÉÆ¯É ªÀiÁqÀĪÀ zÀÄgÀÄzÉÝñÀ¢AzÀ, CfÓ, ¹¢ÝÃQ, C¥sÉÆæÃeïSÁ£ï, FIR, PÉù£À ¸ÀAQë¥ÀÛ ¸ÁgÁA±À zÉÆõÁgÉÆÃ¥ÀuÁ, ªÀÄAZÀ, ÃgÀÄ, ¨É¯É, J5, EªÀgÀÄUÀ¼ÉÆA¢UÉ, ¤ÃrwÛzÀÝgÀÄ, ®, CAvÁ, gÀªÀgÀÄ, CAvÁ ºÉý, gÀªÀgÀÄ, gÀªÀgÀÄ, gÀªÀjUÉ ºÉÆmÉÖ, EzÁÝUÀ ¢£ÀAPÀ:04-01-2021, gÀªÀgÀÄ ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ, gÀªÀgÉÆA¢UÉ C¸À¨sÀåªÁV, CªÁZÀåªÁV, gÀªÀgÀÄ, gÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß, gÀªÀgÀ£ÀÄß, PÉÆr¹PÉÆAqÀÄ zÁªÀtUÉgÉUÉ PÀgÉzÀÄPÉÆAqÀÄ §A¢gÀÄvÁÛÛgÉ., gÀªÀgÀÄ, ¨Á¼À£ÀÄß ºÁ¼ÀÄ ªÀiÁqÀ¨ÉÃqÀ £, EµÀÖ«, AzÀÄ ¸ÁQë-1 gÀªÀjUÉ CªÁZÀå ±À§ÝUÀ½AzÀ, PÉÊPÁ®ÄUÀ½AzÀ ºÉÆqÉzÀÄ, gÀªÀgÀÄ, CAvÁ, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, Supp, FIR, Magistrate, FIR, FIR, Magistrate, FIR, Emphasis, The Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, BHAJANLAL, Court, the Apex Court, Sections, IPC, FIR, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, The Apex Court, Navasari, Maharashtra, Court, cruelty.—Whoever, IPC, Bar, Bar, Bar, Emphasis, GEETA MEHROTRA v. STATE OF U.P.4, the Apex Court, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, FIR, Shyamji Mehrotra, the High Court, inter alia, IPC, Sections 3/4, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, FIR, the High Court, Court, the High Court, FIR, the High Court, FIR, IPC, Ramji Mehrotra, FIR, High Court, Emphasis, The Apex Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, See State, U.P., U.P., Vanshika, the Court of CJM, CrPC, BIHAR6 the Apex Court, the Appellants and Respondents, IPC, Court, the Crime Records Bureau, Court, IPC, IPC, Bar, Bar, Bar, Court, Court, the High Court, Lordships, IPC, FIR, Appellants, Appellants, Appellants, FIR, the State of Bihar, FIR, FIR, Appellants, Emphasis, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, MIRZA, IPC, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, RAM GOPAL PODDAR7, the Apex Court, the High Court, CrPC, The High Court, the High Court, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, FIR, the Apex Court, Court, the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, JMFC, Sd/-, CT
GPE: MR, DAVANAGERE, DAVANAGERE, DAVANAGERE, DAVANAGERE, J.M.F.C., No.7, O.S., Crime, dtd:10, dtd:10, vÁvÁÌ, Crime, PÉÆlÄÖ, gÀ, P.C., P.C., Harihar, Gujarat, Goregaon, SCC66728, Telangana, USA, Kumar v. State of Telangana, Kailash, Kailash, the State of Michigan, the State of Michigan, Michigan, USA, Arnesh, Kumar v. State, Preeti, Md.
ORDINAL: SECTION482OF, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 1st, 6th, 7th, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 1st, 1st, first, first, 1st, 6th, 7th, 8th, third, third, third, second, third
PRODUCT: 323, No.1, Plaint, Á£ÀÄ F, DvÀ£ÀÄ, C£ÉÃPÀ zÀıÀÑlUÀ½UÉ zÁ¸À£ÁVzÀÄÝ, F ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ, EzÉ, ¸ÀzÀj, zÀ §, ªÁºÀ «ZÉÒÃzÀ£ÀPÁÌV Cfð, ¨Á¼À£ÀÄß, zÉÆgÀQ¹PÉÆqÀ¨ÉÃPÉAzÀÄ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ, J1, J2, J4, J5, J2, J4, J5, ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀiÁzÀ ¢£ÀªÉÃ, J4, J5, J6, F ªÀÄ£ÉAiÀÄ, J2, J4, J5, J2, J4, J5, J2, J4, J5, 323, Respondent 2, Vanshika
NORP: complainant/2nd, complainant/2nd, r., §, §, §, §, complainant/2nd, Kans, Nayan, Rajesh Sharma, Objects
LOC: Affidavit, ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtð, ªÀÄzÀĪÉAiÀÄ ¸ÀA¥ÀÆtð RZÀð£ÀÄß ¨sÀj¹
MONEY: ºÁUÀÆ £À£Àß ªÀiÁªÀ, ºÁUÀÆ £ÀªÀÄä §AzsÀÄ-¨ÁAzsÀªÀgÀÄ £À£Àß UÀAqÀ£À, £ÀAvÀgÀ £, ¥ÀwßAiÀiÁV £À£Àß UÀAqÀ£À ªÀÄ£É, £ÀAvÀgÀ £, ºÁUÀÆ £, ºÁUÀÆ £À£ÀUÉ, £ÉÆÃr £À£Àß £, £Á£ÀÄ £À£Àß UÀAqÀ£ÉÆA¢UÉ, ºÁUÀÆ £À£Àß UÀAqÀ£À «, ºÁUÀÆ £À£Àß UÀAqÀ¤UÉ, £ÀAvÀgÀ £, ¤ÃgÀÄPÉÆqÀzÉà £À£ÀߣÀÄß gÀÆ«Ä£À, £ÉÆAzÀ £, A¢gÀÄvÉÛãÉ. £, £À£ÀߣÀÄß £À£Àß UÀAqÀ£À PÉʬÄAzÀ £À£ÀߣÀÄß ©, £ÀAvÀgÀ £, ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆArgÀÄvÁÛ¼É. £, ¥ÀqÉzÀÄPÉÆArgÀÄvÁÛ¼É. £, ¸ÁQë-4 gÀªÀjUÉ ¥, 8073841594 £ÀA§gï¤AzÀ ¥, ºÉÆÃVgÀÄvÁÛ£ÉAvÁ ¸ÁQëzÁgÀgÀ «ZÁgÀuɬÄAzÀ, 6 2022
FAC: DzÀÄzÀjAzÀ
QUANTITY: £ÉÆêÀÅ §AzÀÄ
WORK_OF_ART: State of UP7