Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

State of Assam Vs. Banwarilal Pipalwa

Decided On : Feb-14-1992

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Section 16(1)(a, Section 7, Section 16 of the Act, Section 13(2, Section 13(2, Section 13(2, the Division Bench

ORG: S.N. Phukan, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, the Food Inspector, Food Inspector, Peon, Dahi, The Food Inspector, Public, the Local Health Authority.3., Dahi, Public, Court, Court, Court, the Local (Health) Authority, the Central Food Laboratory, Act.6, Court, Dahi, Haryana High Court, The Food Inspector, kunda, P.W. 2, the Food Inspector, Court

NORP: J.1, Punjab

CARDINAL: 14, 16-6-89, 30-4-86, 21-6-85, three, one, two, two, three, 4, 1, 521, 205, 3, 3, 4, one, 14

PERSON: Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup, suo-motu, Mahabir Mistanna Bhandar, Guwahati, Guwahati, Nepali, S. S. Sharma, Kataky, Dey, Anukul Ch, Dey, S. S. Sharma, Raj Pal v. State of Punjab, Bench, Ram Kumar

DATE: 1986, 1954, 1985, a period of, 10 days, 1984

GPE: Kamrup, Silpukhuri, Cr, P.C.

TIME: about 2 p.m. Shri Goswami

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //