Semantic Analysis by spaCy
State of Assam Vs. Banwarilal Pipalwa
Decided On : Feb-14-1992
Court : Guwahati
LAW: Section 16(1)(a, Section 7, Section 16 of the Act, Section 13(2, Section 13(2, Section 13(2, the Division Bench
ORG: S.N. Phukan, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, the Food Inspector, Food Inspector, Peon, Dahi, The Food Inspector, Public, the Local Health Authority.3., Dahi, Public, Court, Court, Court, the Local (Health) Authority, the Central Food Laboratory, Act.6, Court, Dahi, Haryana High Court, The Food Inspector, kunda, P.W. 2, the Food Inspector, Court
NORP: J.1, Punjab
CARDINAL: 14, 16-6-89, 30-4-86, 21-6-85, three, one, two, two, three, 4, 1, 521, 205, 3, 3, 4, one, 14
PERSON: Judicial Magistrate, Kamrup, suo-motu, Mahabir Mistanna Bhandar, Guwahati, Guwahati, Nepali, S. S. Sharma, Kataky, Dey, Anukul Ch, Dey, S. S. Sharma, Raj Pal v. State of Punjab, Bench, Ram Kumar
DATE: 1986, 1954, 1985, a period of, 10 days, 1984
GPE: Kamrup, Silpukhuri, Cr, P.C.
TIME: about 2 p.m. Shri Goswami