Toyota Kirloskar Motor Private Limited Vs. The Commissioner Of Central Tax

Decided On : Apr-21-2021

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Chapter 87, the Central Excise Act, the 3 Factories Act, the Factories Act, the Central Excise Act, the Factories Act, Chapter 10 of the Factories Act, Section 11AC, the Factories Act, Section 46 of the Factories Act, Section 94(2, section 66E, the Factories Act, Section 46

DATE: 2021, No.21681/2018.3, 1944, 1944, 1948, 1948, 1944, 1948, 2004, September 2004, April 2011 i.e., the period of April 2011 to September 2011, 2004, 1948, 28.2.2011, 7 1, 2019, 2011, 2014, 1964, 2002, 1948, 1944, 1994, 1996, 1948, 1217, March 2006 to September 2006, 2004, Rule 2(l)(c, 2004, 1885, 1869, 1921, 1969, 1963, 1964, 1973, 1976, 1977, 2699, 2002, 2004

ORG: JUSTICE, JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, CEA, C/W CEA NO.7/2019, TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR MOTOR PRIVATE LIMITED, BIDADI INDUSTRIAL AREA, BANGALORE URBAN, BANASHANKARI, CEA, U/S35 OF THE CENTRAL, ETC, U/S35 OF THE CENTRAL, ETC, CESTAT, Central Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Private Limited Company, Mysore Factory Rules, Sodexho Food Solutions Private Limited, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Cenvat Credit Rules, the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Commissioner (Appeals, CESTAT/Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Cenvat Credit, the Budge Speech of Finance, Tribunal, the Speech of Finance, Tribunal, Ganeshan Builders Ltd., CST, CEA, Mangalam Cement Ltd., CEA, Stanzen Toyotetsu India, P) Ltd., Resil Chemicals Pvt.Ltd., CEA, CEA, Solaris Chemtech Ltd., Manufacturing Co.Ltd., C.Ex, Ultratech Cement Ltd., Engg Co., CIT, Court, Tribunal, Leave or Home Travel Concession, Ganeshan 11 Builders Ltd., the Madras High Court, Conditions of Service, Court, Court, Reliance, Stanzen Toyotetsu India, P) Ltd., amendment.18, Resil Chemicals Pvt.Ltd., Reliance, Solris Chemtech Ltd., Court, Ferromatik Milacron India Ltd., the Cenvat Credit Rules, Court, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Tribunal, Taxing Statute, Principles of Statutory Interpretation, Strict Construction of Taxing Statute, Parliament, Crown, LT370, TOWLATT, ROWLATT, UPJOHN, Customs, Supreme Court, CIT, Bombay v. Provident Investment Co., Diwan Brothers, Central Bank, SCC800 McDowell & Co.Ltd., Commercial Tax, Wealth Tax, SCC511 Hansraj & Sons, Jammu & Kashmir, AIR2002SC2692 pp.2698, SCC15227, Geo Miller & Co., P) Ltd., Court, Taxing Statute, Court, Tribunal, Sd/-

PERSON: CEA No.7/2019 IS, Bangalore, Bench, New Pratap Spg, Madras, Sayaji Iron, LORD WENSLEYDALE, LORD HALS-BURY, Micklethwait, CAIRNS, Partington v. A.G., Brandy Syndicate v. IRC, HL).22, Debi v. ITO, Vadilal Lallubhai, Mohammad Ali Khan v. Commissioner of, AIR1997SC1165 p.1167:1997.3, para30, Sd/-

CARDINAL: two, 2, 29.10.2018, approximately 40, 2002.4, 50, 100, 1948.5, 4, 2(l, 2004.7, 5, 2(l, 14.3.2013, 23.4.2012, 4.4.2013, Rs.5, 15(1, 2004.9, 6, 20, 2, 2018(9, 3, 23, 4, 36, 5, 207, 214, 6, 7, 2010(260, 8, 9, 253, 8 13, 1.4.2011, 2(l, 9, one, 1.4.2011, 2(l, 10, 2(l, 2(l, 1.4.2011, 1.4.2011, 1.4.2011, 13, 1.4.2011, 11, 14, 1, 3, 3, 7, 3, 3, 1, 6, 5

PRODUCT: No.20469/2018, Rule 9 of the Central Excise Rules, Rule 2(l)(c

GPE: Bengaluru city, 23.4.2012, Bengaluru, India, Dhulia, ITR749(Guj.).12, Taxing Statue, Kerala, Gursahai v., Gujarat, Bombay

NORP: Rules

ORDINAL: second, first

EVENT: post 2011

WORK_OF_ART: General Principles of strict construction A