Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Lakshmesh M. Vs. P. Rajalakshmi (dead By Lrs.) And Ors. Etc Etc
Decided On : Sep-11-2024
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: the Civil Appeal Nos, Page 1, Inams Abolition Act, the Civil Appeal Nos, the Civil Appeal No.9732, Page 13
DATE: 2024, 2008, 31.03.2008, 1980, 9731-9732, 2024, 2024, 2024, 13, 14, 16, 18, 23, 24, 2024, 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18, 19, 20, 22, 24, 28, 2024, 9731-9732, 2024, 13, 14, 16, 18, 1980, 9731-9732, 2024, 1954, 20.05.1972, 9731-9732, 2024, 10.06.1975., 2024, 2024, 1980, 9731-9732, 2024, 30.10.1986, 1986, 1987, 1997, the years, 2007, 1997, 28.08.2003, 9731-9732, 2024, 09.12.1979, 1980, 31.03.2008, 2008, 2008, 13, 14, 16, 18, 23, 9731-9732, 2024, 1980, 2008, 2008, 9, 10(a, 13, 14, 16, 18, 23, 9731-9732, 2024, 9731-9732, 2024, 9731-9732, 2024, 9731-9732, 2024, 9731-9732, 2024, 2024, 2024, 2024, 9731-9732, 2024
ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, the High Court, these Regular First Appeals, City Civil and Sessions, CCH No.27, the High Court, Trial Court, the High Court, Civil Appeal No.9731, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Trial Court, Court, the High Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the High Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Sy No.132/2, State, Mysore (Personnel & Miscellaneous, Smt, Tehsildar, Sy No.132/2, The Appellant/Plaintiff, REMCO Industrial Workers House, Civil Appeal No.9731, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Defendant No.1-Society, Defendant No.1-Society, Defendant No.1-Society, The Regular First Appeal, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Defendant No.1-Society, Court, Court, Appeals, the Trial Court, Muniyappa, Court, the Trial Court, Court, The Respondents/Defendants, the High Court, RFA No.902/2008.10, High Court, the Trial Civil Appeal Nos, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Appeals, the High Court, the High Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Sy No.305/2, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the High Court, the Trial Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, Defendant No.1-Society, Defendant No.1-Society, the High Court, the Metro Rail Project, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the High Court, Defendant No.1-Society, the Metro Rail Project, the High Court, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the High Court, the High Court, the Metro Rail, The Civil Appeal No.9731, GEORGE MASIH
CARDINAL: 9731-9732, two, 902, 887, 13, 12, 13, 29, ten, two, 2, 13, ten, 12, 23, ten, 12, 23, 3, 134, one, 3, 12, 12, 4, 13, 5, 2, 30.10.1986, 13, 3, 12, 12, 6, 13, one, 3, 12, 24, 7, 13, 12, 24, 9, 13, ten, 13, 13
PERSON: VERSUS P. RAJALAKSHMI, XII Addl, Defendant No.20, O.S. No.5634, Agrahara Inam, Defendant No.20, Defendant No.20, B.C. Subbalakshmamma, B.C. Subbalakshmamma, Lakshmesh M., B.C. Subbalakshmamma, No.305, O.S. No.5634, B.C. Subbalakshmamma, Order, Defendant No.20, Defendant No.20, Defendant No.20, Defendants Nos, Defendant No.20, Lakshmesh M. v. C.N. Rangaraju, Lakshmesh M. v. P. Rajalakshmi, S. OKA
NORP: J.1
GPE: Karnataka, Bengaluru, Bengaluru, O.S, Defendant Nos.9, Respondent Nos.10, Defendant Nos.9, Kempapura, Bangalore City, Kempapura, Inam, Smt, Smt, Karnataka, Bengaluru, Defendants Nos.9, terms.12, NEW DELHI
WORK_OF_ART: Appellant/Plaintiff, Appellant/Plaintiff, Appellant/Plaintiff, The Appellant/Plaintiff
MONEY: 30 per cent, 30 per cent, 30 per cent, 30 per cent, 30 per cent, 30 per cent
QUANTITY: over 1 acre, 1 acre, 1 acre, 1 acre, over 4 acres, over 1 acre, 1 acre, 1 acre, 1 acre
FAC: Sy No.132/2, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff, the Appellant/Plaintiff
TIME: 09.12.1969
EVENT: Page 5, Page 10 of 1316, Page 11 of 1318, Page 12