M/s. Al-can Export Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Prestige H.m. Polycontainers Ltd. And Ors.

Decided On : Jul-09-2024

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 247, the Revenue Code, the “SARFAESI Act, Section 178, the Revenue Code and Rule 5(1, Rule 13, Section 208 of the Revenue Code, Section 208 of the Revenue Code, the Revenue Code, the Revenue Code, the Revenue Code, Section 247, the Revenue Code, Section 247, the Revenue Code, section 193 of the Code, the SARFAESI Act, the Revenue Code, the Revenue Code, Section 193 of the Revenue Code, the Revenue Code, Section 247, the Revenue Code, the Revenue Code, Section 247, Section 208 of the Revenue Code, the Revenue Code, Section 212 of the Revenue Code, Section 208 of the Revenue Code, Section 208 of the Revenue Code, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 247, the Revenue Code, Chapter, section 72, section 193, Chapter, section 193, section 191, section 206, Chapter, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Order XXI Rule 90, Order 21 Rule 90 of the Code, Ruma Pal, Order 21 Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 21 Rule 90, Order 21 Rule 90, Order 21 Rule 67(1, Order 21 Rule 54(2, Order 21 Rule 67, Order 21 Rule 67(1, Rule 54, Order 21 Rule 90(2, Order 21 Rule 90(2, Rule 90, Rule 90, Rule 90, Order 21, Rule 90, Rule 90, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 141, Constitution, Section 141, Section 141, Article 226 of the Constitution and the decisions, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 141, the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 141 of the Code, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution.45, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Article 226 of the Constitution.46, the Explanation to Section 141, Article 226 of the Constitution.47, Article 137 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 141, Order 22, Article 226 of the Constitution, Rule 32, Article 225 of the Constitution, Section 141, Rule 32, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 141, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 141, Section 141, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 141, Constitution, Rule 39, Section 141 of the Code, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 141.49, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Civil Appeals @ SLP, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 9, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution.56, the Revenue Code, Section 194, the Revenue Code, Section 193 of the Revenue Code, Section 194, the Revenue Code, Section 194, the Revenue Code, section 193, Section 195 of the Revenue Code, Section 195 of the Revenue Code, Section 195, the Revenue Code, Section 195, Section 212 of the Revenue Code, Section 212 of the Revenue Code, Section 208 of the Revenue Code, Section 208 of the Revenue Code, Section 208 of the Revenue Code, Section 194, the Revenue Code, Section 212 of the Revenue Code, the Revenue Code, Cal 61, Section 247, Section 247, the Revenue Code, Section 210, Section 210

DATE: 2024, 1966, 2011, 2011, 15.01.2009, 1966, 2002, 2002, 15.10.2007 and 20.11.2007, 1967, 27.11.2007, 14.08.2008, 18.08.2008, 17.11.2008, 19.11.2008, 21.11.2008, 23.11.2008, 29.11.2008, 10.12.2008, 12.08.2003, 18.12.2008, 19.12.2008, 26.12.2008, 2008, 2009, 12.08.2003, 2008, 2009, 12.01.2009, 15.01.2009, 16.01.2009, 2009, 2009, 4.04.2009, 2009, 16.04.2009, 2009, 2009, 17.11.2009, 2009, 17.11.2009, 18.06.2010, 2009, 58, 18.06.2010, 2010, 2011, 2011, 2010, 18.06.2010, 2011, 2011, 30 days, 19/11/2008, 30 days, the same day, 30 days, 16/01/2009, 3/12/2008, 18/02/2010.41, 12 weeks, last several years, 12 weeks, today, 2016, 2011, 2016, 2011, 19.09.2016, 13.10.2016, 2016, 2002, 5813, 14 of 5816, 2017, the year 2008, 58, 2014, 30 days, 30 days, no 30 days, the same day i.e., the same day, the very next day, 58, 15.01.2009, 10.12.2008, 19.12.2008, 07.01.2009, 12.01.2009, 6 to 7 crores.25, 1966, 58, the day, arrear, 73, at least fifteen days, 58, Sunday, at least thirty days, seven days, thirty days, the third day, third days, Sunday, the first office day, such day, a period of, seven days, thirty days, thirty days, thirty days, thirty days, thirty days, 2[or, sixty days, ninety days, sixty and ninety days, 15 days, three weeks, 2006, 2006, 81, 1964, 1991, 2000, 14, 58, 54, 2006, 15 days', 15 days', 58, 1976, 58, 8.4.1974, 58, 2024, 1976, 1908, 43, 1974, 1976, 1976, 1976, (1996, 10, 11, 1981, 1 SLR274:84, 1908, 1984, 48, 1994, 58, 2007, years, 54, 2022, 55, at least 30 days, the expiry of, 30 days, Sunday, at least thirty days, seven days, 46 of 5857, 30 days, 23.11.2008, thirty days, the same day i.e., the same day, 15.01.2009, 10.12.2008, 19.12.2008, 07.01.2009, thirty days, 12.01.2009, 30 days, 19.11.2008, the same day, 15.01.2009, Almost a century back, 1908, 1841, 58, 1993, 1966?.68, a period of, 30 days

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7254, APPELLANT, India) Ltd., Order XXI Rule, State, Konkan Division, Maharashtra, the High Court, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, Konkan Division, Talasari, the Additional Collector, Talasari, the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the Additional Collector, A. FACTUAL MATRIX6, Court, the State Bank of India, Village Vadavali, Maharashtra (, the State Bank of India, Asset Reconstruction Company, The Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the Maharashtra Realisation of Land Revenue Rules, Gram, The Office of the Circle Officer, Talasari, Talasari, the M/s, Trimurti Industrial Engineering Services, Talasari, the Police Inspector, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the High Court, i., the Sub-Divisional Officer, Dahanu, the Sub Divisional Officer, Dahanu Division, Property, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Dahanu Division, M/s Trimurti Industries Eng., Notice, Dahanu Times, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Property, Talasari, Additional Collector, Sub-Divisional, Dahanu Division, Group Development Officer, the Office of Tahsildar, the Dahanu Times, the Additional Collector Thane, Head Office Javar, Property, the Additional Collector Thane, Head Office, the Sale Certificate, IFCI, FEMA, IFCI, the Bombay High Court, the Civil Appeals @ SLP, The Bombay High Court, Union of India, The Additional Collector, Head Office, the Additional Collector, the High Court, IFCI, the District Collector, the Additional Collector, Chamber Summons No.49, the High Court, the Writ Petition (C, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, Konkan Division, Writ Petition No.3444, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, the Additional Collector, Thane H.Q. Jawar, the Additional Collector, WP, the High Court of Judicature, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Konkan Division, Collector of District, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the Authority on 08/11/2008, Dahanu Times, Talasari, Tahasildar, Tahasildar, Tahasildar, Shravan Vithoba Dekate, The Apex Court, Tahasildar, the Additional Collector, the Additional Collector, Apex Court, Maharaja Chintamani, Tahasildar, the Additional Collector, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the Apex Court, Coram, Emphasis, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Contempt Petition No.81, the High Court, Court, DRT, DRT, DRT, the O.A. No.168 of, Court, the High Court, Court, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Court, Vijaya Lakshmi, the Additional Commissioner,, Sections 207, Sections 207, the Central Government, Civil Appeals @ SLP, India) Ltd., Civil Appeals @ SLP, the Additional Collector, the Additional Collector, IFCI, IFCI, the Additional Collector, Tahsildar, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Prestige H.M. Polycontainers Ltd., Civil Appeals @ SLP, The High Court, Court, i., the Additional Collector, IFCI, the Additional Collector, the Additional Collector, WP, the High Court, IFCI, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Order XXI Rule, Konkan Division, Maharashtra, State, the State Government, State Government, the State Government, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Bank, the Land Development Bank, the Collector of the district, the State Government, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Collector, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the State Government, Order XXI Rule, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Court, Chilamkurti, Order XXI Rule, CPC, Chilamkurti, Court, the State Bank of India, The State Bank of India, The State Bank of India, the State Bank of India, the Court of Senior Civil Judge, Kovvur, the Civil Appeals @ SLP, Court, CPC, The Senior Civil Court, Kovvur, the High Court, The High Court, Court, Court, Chilamkurti, Court, Court, Bench, the High Court, inter alia, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the Collector of the district, the Gram Panchayat, the High Court, Court, The High Court, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Court, Court, Chilamkurti, Order XXI Rule, CPC, CPC, Court, Court, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Court, Court, The Law Commission, Fourteenth Report, Emphasis, The Law Commission, Explanation, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the Law Commission, Commission, the State of Objects, Civil Appeals @ SLP, CPC, Jagan Singh & Co., Ludhiana Improvement Trust & Ors, State, CPC, State, Land Revenue Code, CPC, CPC, State, CPC, Civil Appeals @ SLP, CPC, High Court, Some High Court, CPC, High Courts, State, U.P., Court, the High Court, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the High Court, Emphasis, CPC, Court, the High Courts, the High Court, Emphasis, Order IX, the Statement of Objects, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Allahabad, Punjab High Court, CPC, CPC, Court, Puran Singh & Ors, State of Punjab & Ors, Consolidation of Holdings, Court, the High Court, Civil Appeals @ SLP, the Civil Appeals @ SLP, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, Emphasis, CPC, The High Court, Order XXI Rule, CPC, Order XXI Rule, The High Court, Civil Courts, State Civil Courts Acts, CPC, The High Court, the Civil Court, The High Court, State, State, State, Civil Appeals @ SLP, Judicial, Court, Tata Cellular v. Union of India, Government, Court, Civil Appeals @ SLP, SCC517 this Court, Judicial, The Civil Appeals @ SLP, Emphasis, State of Punjab & Others, Court, State, Emphasis, State, CPC, State, Civil Appeals @ SLP, CPC, State, State, the Civil Appeals @ SLP, the Additional Collector, IFCI, Additional, the Additional Collector, the Additional Collector, the High Court, Civil Appeals @ SLP, IFCI, Property, the Additional Collector, Tahsildar, the Additional Collector, IFCI, Civil Appeals @ SLP, CPC, Emphasis, Order XXI Rule, CPC, Civil Appeals @ SLP, U.P. Financial Corporation & Ors, Konkan Division, Maharashtra, Konkan Division, State of Maharashtra, Additional, Sale

PERSON: INDEX A. FACTUAL, 3 B. SUBMISSIONS, Prestige H.M. Polycontainers, H.M. Polycontainers, Taluka Talsari, Survey No.87/11, Dilip Sahani, G.W. Sahani, P.K. Gupta, P.K. Gupta, j., P.K. Gupta, Thane H.Q. Jawar, Talsari, Gram Panchayat Vadavli-Bhavane, Talathi Saja, Vadavli, Talsari, t. Ultimately, Specimen 8, w., y., z., Appeal Nos, mm, 18/02/2010, Taluka, Taluka, Mathew, b. Writ Petitions, Petitioner, 07/09/2010, P.S. Patwalia, Tahsildar, Chilamkurti Bala Subrahmanyam, Division Konkan, Patwalia, Patwalia, Amar Dave, Tahsildar, Prestige, g., Mathew Varghese v. M. Amritha, l., Dave, Dave, b., xxx xxx xxx S.169, xxx xxx xxx, S.196, xxx xxx xxx S.200, xxx xxx xxx, Schedule, Schedule, F. ANALYSIS i. Whether, Khan, Mohd, Yousufuddin, Khan, Mohd, Yousufuddin, Mohd, Yousufuddin, Bench, Dhirendra Nath Gorai, Sudhir Chandra Ghosh, Dhirendra Nath Gorai v. Sudhir, Chandra Ghosh, Jaswantlal, Sushilaben Manilal Dangarwala, Jaswantlal, Sushilaben Manilal Dangarwala, Supp, Kadiyala Rama Rao v., Gutala Kahna Rao, Gutala Kahna Rao, Bald, Saheb Khan v. Mohd, Yousufuddin, Saheb Khan, Order XXI Rule, Vol, Gazette, II S.2, Reasons, Order XXI, Order XXI Rule, Tahsildar, Order XXI Rule, Order XXI CPC, Vijay Anand, Muljibhai Patel, Khodidas Barot, Reasons, Madras, Ram Kala v. Asstt, LR100, Teja Singh v. Union, Rokyayabi v. Ismail Khan, Wednesbury, Mehar Din, Order XXI Rule, Order XXI Rule, Order XXI Rule, Ashutosh, Behari Lal, Mookerjee, Dhirendra Nath v. Sudhir Chandra, Mahesh Chandra v. Regional

CARDINAL: 13, 16, 21, 26, two, 1, 6, 52, 55, 1, 581, 3.12.2008, 2, 58, two, 13,978, 3, 58, Two, 29,52,000/-, 29,52,000/-, No.4, No.4, No.4, 21.08.2008, 4, 58, No.4, one, 21.08.2008, 69,00,000/-, 51,75,000/-, No.4, 20.10.2008, 20.10.2008, No.4, 51,75,000/-, 07.11.2008, No.4, 18.11.2008, No.4, 5, 58, No.4, 20.11.2008, one, No.4, 03.12.2008, No.4, 21.11.2008, 6, No.4, No.4, No.4, 19.12.2008, No.4, 04.12.2008, No.4, 10.12.2008, No.1, 7, 58, No.4, No.4, No.4, No.4, 208, 8, 09.07.2009, No.8, No.4, 195, No.8, No.4, 9, 33, 288/2009".34, 202, 210, two, 12, 11, 58, 8, two, two, two, two, 12, 589, 2016.10, 24,15,20,115.76/-, 193, 37, 20.10.2008, 6, two, two, No.1, 6, 55, two, more than two hundred, 15, 23, 16, 58, 17, 58, 04.12.2008, 1, 75, 000, 18, 5, 19, No.4, No.4, 20, 58, two, 1, 6, 2, 21, 2, arrear, 192, 193, 2, 22, 3, 2, 3, 4, 2, 192, 193, 194, 195, 23, 58, twenty-five, 2, 2[after, 208, 209, one hundred and eighty days, 2, 24, one hundred and, S.209, one hundred and, 2, one hundred and, 25, 1, 2, 1, two, 2, 26, No.2, 27, 58, Seven, 4, 14, 4, three, 12, 28, 58, 12, 2, 90, 2, 13, 6, 2, 3, 29, 2, 54, 2, 2, 4, four, four, 30, 24, 1, 2, 31, 3, 90, 1, 2, 3, 32, 1, 454-55, 51, one, 33, 58, Fifty-fourth, one, 325, 90, 1, 34, 2, 1, 3, 90, 3, 35, 89, 37, 58, 2, 10, 38, 2, 9, 9, three, five, 39, 32, 32, 32, 226, 227, 2, 40, 58, 226, 227, 226, 227, 41, 42, 58, 6, two, one, 43, 14, 22, 44, 58, 20, 45, 58, 1, 2, 47, 58, No.4, one hundred and, No.4, 48, 58, 212, 208, 35, 487, 50, 58, 67, 63, 51, two, 1, 6, two, 1

NORP: D., Talasari, Rules, Maharashtra, Rules, Maharashtra, Tahsildar, d., D., Chavdi, Chavdi, Extra, Rules, d.

QUANTITY: 26 a. Difference, No.1., 58 gg, 58 xxx xxx, 58 a. Difference

GPE: Tahsildar, Bombay, Mumbai, Thane, Thane, District Thane, Mumbai, Thane, Jawar, WP, Jawar, Bombay, Thane, Bombay, WP, Bombay, Thane, Bombay, WP, Tahsildar, Mumbai, O.A., Samanthapudi, Bombay, illegal.30, Saheb, Saheb, Saheb Khan, pp, India, Babubhai, Articles, Jagdish, Orissa, Bombay, Holmes v.

LOC: Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Single, Tahsildar

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, No.1, no.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, 31.12.2008, No.1, No.1, No.1, the Appeal No.195 of, No.1, 210, 210, 210, No.1, SCR1001, Notes, Calcutta, a Full Bench, No.1

FAC: Tahsildar, Tahsildar, 288, Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Kadiyala Rama Rao v., Tahsildar, Tahsildar, Tahsildar

TIME: 11 AM, 11 AM, 16.12.2008

WORK_OF_ART: Nirdhar, Miscellaneous proceedings.- The, Amending Act

MONEY: 12 per cent, five per cent, Twenty-seventh, 234, thousands and millions, 2 SCC279 ii

ORDINAL: first, first, Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, third, fourth, third, second, second, first, first

EVENT: Lakh Fifteen Thousand Only