Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ravinder Kumar Vs. State (nct Of Delhi)

Decided On : Mar-06-2024

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 498-A, the Indian Penal Code, Section 302 IPC, Section 304-B/498-, Section 302 IPC, Section 304B/34 IPC, Section 498A/34 IPC, Section 302/34 IPC, Section 302, Section 34, Section 34, Section 302/34 IPC, Section 302/34 IPC, Section 304-, Section 34, Section 498-A, Section 34, Section 302 IPC, Section 34, Section 302 IPC, Section 304B, Section 498A IPC, Section 302 IPC, Section 302 IPC, Section 498A, Section 302 IPC, Section 106, the Evidence Act, Section 65A, the Evidence Act, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 302 IPC, Section 34

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, KUMAR, APPELLANT(S, the Division Bench, the High Court, Criminal Appeal, FIR, the Police Station Civil Lines, FIR, Old Chandrawal, FIR, the Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Court, The FIR No.211/04 (Ext. PW-1, Sub Inspector Ram Chander, FIR, IPC, Rohini Courts, Criminal Appeal No.569 of, The High Court, IPC, The High Court, IPC, IPC, Criminal Appeal No.2025, Court, Court, the High Court, Criminal Appeal Nos.938-939, Court, Sections 304B, IPC, Criminal Appeal, 498A, Magistrate, Meena, Section 304B IPC, IPC, Court, Court, Sharad Birdhichand Sarda, Court, the High Court, Court, Hanumant v. State of, Court, Hanumant, Court, Court, Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade, Court, the High Court, Court, Courts, FSL, the High Court, PX, PX, PX, The High Court, the High Court, Court, Sharad Birdhichand Sarda, Court, Sections 304B

NORP: J.1, English, wife.17

GPE: Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Meena, North District, Delhi, Nos.2, Phoolwati, Pushpender, Trimukh, Chandrawal, Chandrawal, Chandrawal, NEW DELHI

DATE: 12th October, 2015, 2015, 1860, 1973, 21.10.2003, about three and a half years, Rs.25,000/-, ten years, three years, Rs.25,000/-, six months, three months, 2015, 12th October 2015, Rs.25,000/-, three months, 2017 5, 2016, February 2022, 2022, February 2022, October, 2023, the period, 1952, 1969, 1972, 1952, 1973, 1033, 1973, 28th/29th May, 2004, 28th/29th May 2004, 2006, 15, 27913334, 1618, more than fifteen years, 2024 17

CARDINAL: 1, 20.06.1999, 26.08.2000, 27.04.2001, two, No.2, No.4, 2, 2.2, 29.05.2004, 2.3, 2.4, No.4, No.3, No.2, 25.11.2014/08.01.2015, 2.5, two, 5, 4, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.3, No.4, 2.6, No.4, No.3, No.4, No.4, 2.7, No.2, No.2, 498A, 2.8, 62.9, 14.03.2007, 7, three, 8, 152, 2, 3, 55, 4, 2, only 1(1984, 1, 2, 19, 807, 1047, 2, 10, 3, 4, 5, five, 11, 12, 2, 10, No.2, more than one, 14, one, two, one, 9818419048, 3334, 498A

PERSON: Mani Ram, Gyanwati, Kumar, Kumar, Pushpender Singh, R. Harshinder, Civil Line, Harry, Mani Ram, Shiv Kumar, Gyanwati, Meena, Ravinder Kumar, Babu Lal, Phoolwati, Pushpender, R. 3 Harshinder, Addl, Mani Ram, Pushpender, Pushpender, Pushpinder, Babu Lal, R. Harshinder, Babu Lal, Phoolwati, Babu Lal, Babu Lal, Pushpender, R. Harshinder, Neha Kapoor, Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Kapoor, Kapoor, Kapoor, Shri Rajan, Kumar Chourasia, Cri LJ129, Simmi v. State, SCC, Ramgopal v. State, SCC625, Mahajan, Cri LJ129, SCC, Crl LJ1783, accused.10, Maroti Kirkan, Pushpender, Ravinder Kumar, Ravinder, J.(B.R. GAVAI

PRODUCT: No.1, 1 Harry, No.1, Tufail

TIME: 0055 hours, the morning, about 0820 hours, the intervening night, the night

MONEY: No.1, No.1

FAC: Rs.20,000/-

ORDINAL: 15th, 15th, first, first

LOC: Saroj

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //