Chandigarh Housing Board Vs. Tarsem Lal

Decided On : Feb-07-2024

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Page 1, Regulation 25, Article 341, Page 3 of 31, Page 4, Article 342 of the Constitution, Page 5, the Regular Second Appeal, Article 342 of the Constitution of India, Page 6 of 3110, Article 342 of the Constitution of India, the Civil Appeal @ SLP, Article 342 of the Constitution of India insofar as, Article 342 of the Constitution, Constitution, Page 11, Constitution, the Civil Appeal @ SLP, Page 12, the Punjab Reorganization Act, Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article 341 of the Constitution., Article 341(1, Article 341(1, Page 14 of 3117, a Constitution Bench, Constitution, Article 341(2, the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, Constitution, Page 15, Article 341 mutatis, Article 342, Constitution, the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, Constitution, Constitution, Page 16, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 341, Article 342, Article 14, Article 21, Article 342, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Page 19, Constitution, Article 341, Article 15(4, another Constitution Bench, Constitution, Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Page 21, Constitution, Constitution, Article 341, Article 342, the Civil Appeal @ SLP, Page 24, Article 342, Article 342, Page 25, Article 342 of the Constitution, Article 342 of the Constitution of India, Article 342 of the Constitution of India, Page 30

DATE: 2024, 2019, 10.08.2018, 2019, 1979, at least three years, 09.09.1983, 2019, 21.09.1983, 2019, 09.01.1986, 21.09.1983, 2019, 21.09.1983, 21.05.1985, 2019, 1990, 1994, 2018, 2019, 21.09.1983, 21.05.1985, 2019, 2019, 2019, 2019, 1966, 1951, 1951, 2019 Page 13, 2019, 2001, 1950, 1950, 1950, 1950, 35, 2019, 18, 1958, 16, 68, 2019 Page 23, 2019, 25.11.1985, 31, 2019, 25.11.1985, November, 1985, 8-Jan Marg, 160009, May 1985, 2019 Page 28, 2019 Page 29, 21.09.1983, 21.05.1985, 21.09.1983, February 07, 2024

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No, Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.1663, CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARD, VERSUS, the High Court of Punjab, Chandigarh Housing Board, the Chandigarh Housing Board (Allotment, Management and Sale of Tenements, Union Territory, U.T. of Chandigarh, the Chandigarh Administration, Chandigarh under Article 342, Finance, the Chandigarh Administration, the Brochure on Reservation for Scheduled Castes, the Court of Senior Sub, Union Territory of Chandigarh, Court, the Chandigarh Administration, the Scheduled Tribes of, Court, Civil Appeal, the First Appellate Authority, the High Court, The High Court, the Chandigarh Administration’s, the Ministry of Home Affairs’ Letter No, SC & BCD, Chandigarh Administration, the Chandigarh Housing Board, State, Court, Action Committee, Union of India, Delhi Jal Board, the Union Territory of Chandigarh, Presidential Order, State, the Union Territory of Chandigarh, Exhibit D-3, Union Territory of Chandigarh, Court, the Union Territory of Chandigarh, the High Court, the State or Union Territory, State, Court, Union Territory of Chandigarh, Annexure P-9, the Ministry of Welfare, Government of India, State, State, Union Territory, State, the Union Territory, Court, Transport Department, Union Territory Administration of Dadra, Court, Delhi Jal Board, Union Territories, National Capital Territory, Court, State, State, HIG house, the Trial Court, the First Appellate Court, State, State, State, Scheduled Castes, State, State, State, State, the Union Territory of Chandigarh, Parliament, the Union Territory of Chandigarh, Union Territories, Union Territories, the Union Territory of Chandigarh, Court, State, State, State, State, State, Court, State, Maharashtra v. Milind, Parliament, Court, Presidential, Parliament, State, Union Territories, Parliament, State, The Presidential Orders, Court, Court, Venkatarama Aiyer, State, State, State, State, State, Andhra Civil Appeal @ SLP, Action Committee, Court, the Constituent Assembly Debates, Scheduled Castes, State, State, State, Scheduled Castes/Schedule Tribes, State, State, State, State A, State, State, Court, SC, the National Capital Territory of, State, State, State, State/Union Territory, the Presidential Orders, State, State, State, the Presidential Orders, Court, Parliament, State, State or Union Territory, Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes, Parliament, Civil Appeal @ SLP, Court, Union, Subordinate Services, Union Territories, Union Territories, Court, Union Territories, the National Capital Territory, the Union Territory of Dadra, Court, the Union Territory of Dadra, the Union Territory of Dadra, Union Territory, Dadra & Nagar, State, State, State, Court, State, State, State, the State of, State, Chandigarh Housing Board, the Chandigarh Housing Board – Clarification, the Ministry of Home Affair’s, the Scheduled Castes/ Tribes, State, the Ministry of Home Affairs, Sd/-, Y.P. MARWAHA, Court, State, Reliance, Court, State, Union Territory, State, State, State, Reliance, Court, Union Territories, the National Capital Territory, the Union Territory of Chandigarh is concerned.31, no Presidential Order, Union Territory of Chandigarh, Housing Board, The High Court, Tribe, Union Territory of Chandigarh, the Brochure on Reservation of Scheduled Castes, Brochure, State, the First Appellate Court, the Trial Court

PERSON: JUDGMENT Leave, Haryana, Chandigarh, Scheduled Tribe, Chandigarh, Civil Suit No.327/1984, Chandigarh, Tribes, Chandigarh, Scheduled Tribe, Chandigarh, Rajasthan, Rachana Joshi Issar, Shri Shivendra Singh, Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao, Dean, Seth G. S. Medical College, Chandra Shekhar Rao, Bir Singh, Tribes, Tribes, Presidential Order, Tribes, Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao, Tribes, Scheduled Tribe, Nagar Haveli, Silvassa, Abhinav Dipakbhai Patel, Dipakbhai Patel, Bir Singh, Articles 341, Tribes, Chandigarh, Schedule, Gajendragadkar, Bhaiya Lal v., Harikishan Singh, Articles 341, Articles 341, Articles 341, Tribes, Tribes, Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao, Tribes, Tribe, Articles 14, Articles 14, Andhra Pradesh, Chandra Shekhar Rao, Chandra Shekhar Rao, Castes, Tribes, Abhinav Dipakbhai Patel, Nagar Haveli, Nagar Haveli, Tribes, Nagar Haveli, Abhinav Dipakbhai Patel, Chandigarh, Tribes, Scheduled Tribe, Chandra Shekhar Rao Civil, Marri Chandra Shekhar Rao, Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Tribe, Scheduled Tribes, Notification, Tribes, Exhibit D-3, J.[AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH

CARDINAL: 313, 35, One, 12.09.1983, 2, 314, four, two, 35, only four, twenty, four, 31, four, 31, 3, 5 SCC244(Action, 10, 31, 8, 31, 25.11.1985, 9, 31, 6, 66, 342, 341, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 31, 36, 31, 10, 342, 1, 11, 342, 31, 342, 366(25, 342, 31, 342, 13, 17, two, 918, two, one, 19, one, 18, 31, 19(1)(e, 19(1)(e, 31, 342, 16, 20, 31, two, 342, 34, 31, one, 342, 32, 36, 342, 22, 31, 68, 31, 31, 26, 31, 23, 28, 22.2.85, 21.5.85, 31, 68, 31, 2, 31, 31, 31

PERCENT: 12.5 %, 5%, less than 5%, 5%, 5%

GPE: U.T., India, the State of Rajasthan, India, Singh, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, Delhi, India, Articles 366(24, States, Venkataramana Devaru, India, States, States, Delhi, Articles 341, India, Delhi, Delhi.22, Delhi, Delhi, India, U.T., U.T., Delhi, India, India, New Delhi

NORP: U.T., Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Schedules Tribe, Articles 341, Articles 341, Articles 341, Articles 341, Articles 341, Notification, Exhibit P-8

WORK_OF_ART: the Scheduled Tribes, Regular Second Appeal No.1570/1991, the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Castes, Castes/Scheduled Tribes, Scheduled Castes

MONEY: three Constitution Bench

ORDINAL: firstly, secondly, second, first, firstly, Secondly

EVENT: Page 10 of 3112, Page 27 of 3128

LOC: Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Scheduled Castes