Bharti Airtel Limited Vs. Vijaykumar V. Iyer

Decided On : Jan-03-2024

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 25, Section 408, the Companies Act, Section 238, Section 14(4, Page 10, Page 11, Chapter II, Section 53, Chapter III Part II, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 529, the Companies Act, Section 325, Section 46, Section 17326, Chapter III Part II, Section 173, Chapter II Part II, Chapter III Part II, Section 36(4, Chapter, The Liquidation Regulations, Section 240, Section 36(4, the Liquidation Regulations, Regulation 29, Page 15, Section 323, the Insolvency Act, AC785 33, the Insolvency Act, AIR1977Ker 68, Page 21, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 53, Section 52, Provincial Insolvency Act, Provincial Insolvency Act, Regulation 29, Section 25, Chapter II, Section 30(2)(b)(ii, Section 53 of the IBC, Section 53, Section 52, Section 326 of the Companies Act, Section 30, Section 25, Section 30, Section 30, Chapter II, Section 53, Section 30, Chapter III Part II, Chapter II, Chapter II, Section 46, the Companies Act, Page 36, the English Companies Act, Section 60(5)54, Section 60 Adjudicating authority, the English Insolvency Act, Section 3, Section 3 Definitions, Chapter II Part II, Chapter II, Section 14, Section 14

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Resolution Professional, Bharti Airtel Limited, Bharti Hexacom, Dishnet Wireless, the Department of Telecommunications4, Government of India, the Telecom Disputes Settlement, Appellate, Airtel, Airtel, Letters of Understanding, Airtel, DOT, Airtel, Airtel, Airtel, DOT, Airtel, TDSAT, DOT, Civil Appeal No.5816, Court, TDSAT, Airtel, Airtel, Court, Airtel, Airtel, Airtel, Airtel, Airtel, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Aircel Limited, Dishnet Wireless Limited, Mumbai Bench, Aircel Limited, Dishnet Wireless Limited, Bharti Airtel Limited, Bharti Airtel Limited, Bharti Hexacom Limited, Rs.203.46, Airtel, IBC, National Company Law Tribunal, Airtel, the Resolution Professional, Bharti Airtel Limited, the Resolution Professional for Aircel Limited, Dishnet Wireless Limited, Aircel Cellular Limited, Bharti Airtel Limited, Airtel, Bharti Airtel Limited, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the Resolution Professional, Airtel, the Resolution Professional, Airtel, the Adjudicating Authority, Airtel, the Resolution Professional, the National Company Law Appellate, NCLAT, inter alia, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Philip R. Wood, Clearing Systems, Sweet & Maxwell, Jurong Aromatics Corporation Pte Ltd., Others v. BP Singapore Pte Ltd., High Court of Republic of Singapore, 14 Federal Commerce, Navigation Co., Molena Alpha Inc., Conseil, Supreme Court of Canada, Ab.10, Canadian Encyclopedic Digest, Thomson Reuters Canada Limited, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Courts, CPC, Citibank Canada v., Confederation of Life Insurance Company, CRB, Maheswari Metals & Metal Refinery, Madras State Small Industries Corporation, Oxford University, IBC, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, IBC, IBC, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, IBC, The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the Provincial Insolvency Act, IBC, Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, the Liquidation Regulations, the Liquidation Regulations, IBC, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution, Insolvency, Bankruptcy Board of India29, IBC, the Central Government, Board, the Liquidation Regulations, IBC, Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA, Appeal Committee, the House of Lords, House of Lords, the Insolvency Rules, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, National Westminster Bank Ltd., Halesowen Presswork & Assemblies, The Insolvency Rules, The High Court of Australia, The Court of Appeal of Republic of Singapore, BP Singapore Pte Ltd, Jurong Aromatics Corp Pte Ltd and Others35, The Court of Appeal of Republic of Singapore, BP Singapore Pte Ltd., Airtel, the High Court, Trades Private Ltd., Others36, the Kerala Insolvency Act, CPC, Corporate, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the C.A. Nos, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Corporate, the Corporate Insolvency, IBC, IBC, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, IBC, IBC, Belmont Park Investments, BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd., Court, Indian Overseas Bank, Innoventive Industries Limited, Embassy Property Developments Private Limited, Power Limited, IBC, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, CPC41(2022, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the Resolution Professional, IBC, The Resolution Professional, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the European Insolvency Regulation, CPC, the Resolution Professional, Airtel, the Resolution Professional, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Airtel, the House of Lords, British Eagle International Airlines Ltd, Compagnie Nationale Air France47, International Airport Transport Association, Air France, The House of Lords, Air France, IBC, Airtel, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Proceedings, McCormack, IATA, Airtel, Sections, Board, Parliament, State Legislature, C.A. Nos, the Central Government, the State Government, the Consolidated Fund of India, the Consolidated Fund of a State, C.A. Nos, Airtel, IBC, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, Resolution Professional, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, C.A. Nos, Airtel, IBC, the Board, Board, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, IBC, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, IBC, IBC, Swiss Ribbons Private Limited, Another v. Union of India, the Resolution Professional, C.A. Nos, IBC, Swiss Ribbons, Court, the Provincial Insolvency Act, Sections 529, Career Institute Educational Society, IBC, Airtel, IBC, the Adjudicatory Authority, Airtel, the Adjudicating Authority, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, the National Company Law Tribunal, the United Kingdom Insolvency Act and Rules, Reliance, Innoventive Industries Ltd., IBC, IBC, IBC, IBC, IBC, the UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law56, IBC, UNCITRAL Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law, the Resolution Professional, Airtel, Airtel, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, IBC, C.A. Nos, Airtel, IBC, the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, BHATTI

CARDINAL: 3088-3089, 2, 1, 1, 2For, 1, 41, eight, 2.2, eight, three, 4, 5, 2, 41, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 3, 412.6, 2.7, 2.8, 6For, 8, 4, 41, 2.9, 2.10, 5, 412.11, 2.12, two, 9, 10, 11, 12, 6, 41, three, At least five, 13, 7, 41, one, 15, 12, 263, 16, 12, 263, 17Ministre, 8, 41, 6, 18, 1723, 2, 19, 187, 12, 263, 20, 6, 2, 3, 9, 41, two, 21, 6, 22, 288, 23, 19, 24, 41, one, 41, 6, 12, 29, 29, one, 26, one, 2, 1, 27, 13, 41, 4, 29, 196, 208, No.8, 30, 41, 17.1, 16, 41, 2.85, 17.2, 32, 25, 17, 41, 34, 171, 18, 41, one, one, 19, 41, 9, one, 36, 20, 41, 6, one, 41, 37, 38, 22, 41, 23, 41, one, 39, 24, 41, 1, 2, 6, 8, 1, 13, 2, 25, 41, two, 26, 41, one, 25, 29, 41, 6, one, 64, 50, 47, 29, 41, 238, 243, 29, II, 48, 49, 30, 41, 30, 2, 1, 1, 31, 2, 1, 3, 1, 32, 18, 2013).39, 2)(b)(ii, 33, 41, 2, 1, 34, 41, one, 2, 35, 41, 530, 52, 3, 41, 5, 6, 11, 55, 6, 11, 56, 57, 39, 41, 40, 41, 51, 41, 41

NORP: J.The, Indian, British Eagle, British, English

DATE: 20161, April 2016, 3088-3089, 2300, June 2016, 3For, 3088-3089, 9th January 2018, 2018, 28th November 2018, 9th January 2018, 8th January 2019, 3088-3089, 10th January 2019, 12th March 2018, 19th March 2018, 14th May 2018, 2013, 18 of 2013, 3088-3089, 2020, 12th January 2019, 3088-3089, May 2019, 17th May 2019, 2007, 1993, 3088-3089, 2018, 3088-3089, 1978, 2009, 3088-3089, 190820, August 2009, 3088-3089, 42, 39, 3088-3089, 2010, 3088-3089, 1956, 2013, 3088-3089, 1956, 2013, 1920, 1920, 201627, 3088-3089, 3088-3089, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 43, 45, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 30, 1996, 3088-3089, 1996, 3088-3089, 1986, 1986, 1986, 1972, 3088-3089, 1986, 1991, 3088-3089, 35, 2020, 3088-3089, 1955, 3088-3089, 3088-3089, 1908, 3088-3089, 3088-3089, 2012, 3088-3089, 1920, 1920, 2018, 2020, 2022, 3088-3089, 3088-3089, 2020, 3088-3089, 3088-3089, 1975, 3088-3089, 4937, 46, 3088-3089, 3088-3089, 41, twenty-four months, twelve months, the period of two years, 3088-3089, 41, 2013, 3088-3089, 3088-3089, 50, 2022, 2019, 3088-3089, 1920, 1956, 2023, 1981, 3088-3089, 3088-3089, 3088-3089, 2005, 3088-3089, 3088-3089, 2024, 3088-3089

PERSON: C.A. Nos, Aircel Limited, DoT, C.A. Nos, DoT, DoT, DoT, C.A. Nos, Telenor, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, Philip R. Wood11, Kelly R. Palmer, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, Further, C.A. Nos, Gloria Mintah, lien, C.A. Nos, Ramdhari v. Premanand, Bangalore, C.A. Nos, Rory Derham, Derham, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, Blake31, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, Rory Derham, parties.20, C.A. Nos, Thoundasseri Kochu Ouseph Vareed, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, pari, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, V. Nagarajan v. SKS Ispat, C.A. Nos, Gerard McCormack, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, xx xx xx, xx xx xx, Another.50, C.A. Nos, means—(a, C.A. Nos, C.A. Nos, DoT, J.(SANJIV KHANNA, C.A. Nos

GPE: Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Telenor, India, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Aircel, Mumbai, Aircel, Netting, Canada, Revenu, the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, India, United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, Stein, the United Kingdom, United Kingdom, the United Kingdom, Gye, India, India, United Kingdom, India, Karnataka, justice.33, Aircel, the United Kingdom, C.A., indefinitely.43, Others51, Karnataka v. Smt, India, Aircel, NEW DELHI

ORDINAL: 3rd, First, Secondly, Thirdly, first, first, third, third, third, first, second, second, second, second, Secondly, Thirdly, Fourthly, Secondly

WORK_OF_ART: Adjudicating Authority, The Law of Set Off, The Official Liquidator of High Court

FAC: Telenor India

PERCENT: 25 Rory Derham

MONEY: 41 Companies Act, 28 Section 36

EVENT: Regulation 29, Regulation 29, Regulation 29, SCC516 42, Page 27, Regulation 29, Regulation 29, Regulation 29

LANGUAGE: English