Afjal Ansari Vs. State Of Up

Decided On : Dec-14-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Page 1, Section 3(1, the UP Gangsters Act, Section 171F, the Indian Penal Code, Section 135(2, the Model Code of Conduct, Section 3 of the Prevention of Public Properties, Section 7, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, the Explosives Act, Section 7 of the Criminal Law Amendment Act, the Model Code of Conduct, Section 121(2, the UP Gangsters Act, Section 389(1, Page 6, Section 3(1, the UP Gangster Act, Section 8, Section 389(1, Section 389(1, Section 389(1, Section 389(1, Section 389(1, Section 389(1, Page 10 of 19, the UP Gangster Act, Section 389(1, the UP Gangsters Act, Section 8, Section 389(1, Section 8(3, Section 3(1, the UP Gangsters Act, Section 151, Page 18, section 389(1, section 374(2)2, section 389(1, the RoP Act, the Gangsters Act, the Gangsters Act, section 116-A of the RoP Act, the RoP Act, section 389, Page 10, the Indian Penal Code, section 374(2, the Companies Act, Page 11, Section 389(1, Section 389(1, Section 389(1, Page 12, Section 267, the Companies Act, Section 389(1, Section 374, Section 374, Section 389(1, Section 482, Section 389(1, Section 482, Section 267, the Companies Act, section 8, the RoP Act, section 8, Section 8, Section 389 CrPC, section 8(4, the RoP Act, the RoP Act, section 8, section 8, the Societies Registration Act, Article 32 of the Constitution, section 8, the RoP Act, Constitution, Section 389 CrPC, Section 8, Section 389, Section 8 of the Representation of the People Act, Article 102(1)(e, Article 191(1)(e, Section 8, Section 389, Section 8, the RoP Act, Section 389(1, the PC Act, the PC Act, the PC Act, section 482, section 482, the Constitution Bench, section 389, Section 389, section 389, Constitution, section 389, section 34, section 389, section 389(1, section 482, the RoP Act, The Constitution of India, Constitution, the RoP Act, Constitution, the RoP Act, Page 28, the RoP Act, The RoP Act, Constitution, Constitution, Article 102, Article 102, Article 191, the RoP Act, section 8, section 8, the RoP Act, Constitutional, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Preventive Detention Act, Constitution, the RoP Act, Article 102 (Article 83 of the Draft Constitution, Constitution, The RoP Act, the RoP Act, section 8, the RoP Act, the RoP Act, the RoP Act, the RoP Act, the NGT Act, the Human Rights Act, the Advocates Act, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 16, the RoP Act, Page 37, Constitutional, the Constitution’, Article 102(1, Constitution, the RoP Act, the Constitution’ or ‘, the Constitution’, the NGT Act, the Human Rights Act, the Companies Act, Article 311 of the Constitution or, Constitution, Constitutional, Constitution, the RoP Act, section 8, RoP Act, Constitution, the RoP Act, Constitution, section 8, the RoP Act, Constitutional, Page 41

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.3838 Of, Special Leave to Appeal, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the Learned Additional Sessions, The High Court, the Legislative Assembly, Uttar Pradesh, Parliament, the Trial Court, Parliament, Appellant, the Ghazipur Standing Committee on Agriculture, Animal Husbandry, Food Processing, Monitoring Committee, the Mohammadabad Kotwali Police Station, the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters, Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, the District Magistrate of, Case Crime No.1052/2007, the Mohammadabad Police Station, Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttar Pradesh, i. Case Crime, the Representation of People’s Act, Uttar Pradesh, Page 3 of, Court, Uttar Pradesh, IPC, Damages Act, IPC, Uttar Pradesh, IPC, Police Station Bhanvar Kol, the Central Bureau of Investigation, the CBI Court, CBI, IPC, Sections 3,, Trial Court, Case Crime, IPC, Police Station, Mohammadabad, Uttar Pradesh, IPC, RPA, Police Station Chakarghatta, Uttar Pradesh, the New FIR, the Trial Court, Rupees One Lakh, Criminal Appeal No.5295/2023 under Section 374(2, CrPC, the High Court, CrPC, inter alia, the First Criminal Appeal, the High Court, the High Court, Learned Senior Counsel, the High Court, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Learned Senior Counsel, the High Court, Court, Election Commission of India, Additional Solicitor General, the State of UP, CrPC, Court, Thomas v. Union of India3, CrPC, Appellant, CrPC, CrPC, Parliament, CrPC, the Appellate Court, CrPC, the Appellate Court, the Appellate Court, Court, CrPC, Appellant, Appellant, the Trial Court, the High Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, Appellant, the High Court, The High Court, the First Criminal Appeal, Court, Court, CrPC, the New FIR, Appellant, Appellant, Legislature, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, Court, Appellate, Appellant, State Legislative, CrPC, RPA, inter alia, State, the Lok Sabha under Section 8(3, RPA, State, State, Court, RPA, the High Court, House, House, Schemes, the High Court, the First Criminal Appeal, the High Court, the High Court, the Criminal Appeal No.5295 / 2023, Appellant, the High Court, the First Criminal Appeal, the High Court, THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, CRIMINAL, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the High Court, Parliament, the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters, Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Rupees One, the High Court, the High Court, Parliament, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, S.O. No.1994, the High Court, the High Court, Uttar Pradesh, the High Court, the High Court, the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly, the Lok Page 4, the High Court, the Trial Court, Court, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament Local Area Development, General Elections, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, the High Court, Additional Solicitor General, the High Court, Court, Case Crime, Page 7, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, the Karnataka Legislative Assembly, the Bombay High Court, the Karnataka Legislative Assembly, the Bombay High Court, The High Court, Court, Court, IPC, the Delhi High Court, the Bombay High Court, the Company Law Board, the Bombay High Court, Court, the High Courts, Court, Court, Court, the Appellate Court, Court, Court, the Appellate Court, High Courts, the High Court, the Delhi High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Court, Court, Parliament, Parliament, the Legislature of a State, the House of People and the Legislative Assemblies, Parliament, Court, Parliament, the Legislative Assembly, the Representation of People Act, Court, Parliament/Legislative Assembly, Court, Parliament, Parliament, Legislative Assembly, the High Courts, the Public Interest Litigation, Court, inter alia, Court, Parliament, Parliament, IPC, Court, Parliament, Court, Court, Purnesh Ishwarbhai Modi &, Court, Criminal Appeal No.418/2016, Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, Court, Court, State, Maharashtra v., the Bombay High Court, Court, Court, The High Court, Court, inter alia, the Legislative Assembly, Parliament, Court, Court, K. Prabhakaran, Court, Court, K. Prabhakaran, Bench, K. Prabhakaran, IPC, the Legislative Assembly, Court, Court, CPC, CPC, Page 25, K. Prabhakaran, Court, Parliament, Legislative, State, Parliament, the Legislative Assemblies, the Legislative Councils of States, House of Parliament, the Legislative Assemblies/Legislative Councils of the State, House of Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Legislative Assemblies/Legislative Councils of State, Court, the Legislative Assembly, the Legislative Assembly, the Legislative Assembly, Assembly, House, the Indian Union, Legislature, State, a Legislative Assembly, House, a Legislative Assembly, House, Legislative Assembly, the Constituent Assembly Debates, Debates, Parliament, State, Parliament, House of Parliament, House of Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Constituent Assembly Debates, the Constituent Assembly, Court, House, In Public Interest Foundation, Union of India, Court, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, the National Green Tribunal, the National Green Tribunal Act, the National and State Human Rights Commissions, the Protection of Human Rights Act, Court, the Fundamental Right to Life, Parliament, K.C. Sareen, the Lok Sabha, Parliament, an "Appellate Court, the Trial Court, Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the Lok Sabha Secretariat

DATE: 2023, 2023, 1973, 2019, 19.11.2007, 1986, the very same day, 1860, 1951, 16.02.1998, 09.08.2001, 1984, 1932, 27.06.2005, 29.11.2005, 4, 1884, 1932, 11.04.2009, four years, S.O. 1994, 01.05.2023, 29.04.2023. 3.5, the next six months, ten years, more than two years, 2018, 2013, 2009, 03.07.2019, 2007, 6 (2007, Page 13 of 1917, four years, six-year, less than two years, six years, two years, 24th July, 2023, 1973, 2019, 1986, 29th April, 20233, four years, 1951, six years, 1st May, 2023, around 10 years, 56, 2024, 28th July, 2000, seven) years, 2004, 26th March, 2004, the last date, 31st March, 2004, 2007, 1995, 1860, three months, two and a half years, 1956, 56, six) years, 1951, less than two years, six years, from 15th March, 1989, 2009, 2013, three months, 1860, 2018, 56, 101(3)(a, 190(3)(a, 1951, 1989, six years, 29th April, 2016, 13 2023, 1988, year, 14 (2001, 2012, 2014, 56, 42, 2005, two years, 9th May, 2002, 31st May, 2002, 9th May, 2002, 18 (2007, 56, 31st May, 2002, 31-5-2002, 9-5-2002, Articles 102(1)(e, less than two years, six years, 1949, Page 31, two years, 19th May, 1949, the early years, 54, 56, 42, 2019, 2010, 1993, 1961, the days, 2019-2024, 2024, the more than two dozen, 29th April, 2023, 1st May, 2023

PERSON: Afjal Ansari, JUDGEMENT SURYA KANT, Ghazipur, Ghazipur Constituency, Mukhtar Ansari, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Singhvi, Khikhabhai Kachchadia v. State, Lok Prahari, K.M. Nataraj, Natraj, Sanjay Dutt v. State, S. Patil v. Sarvabhouma S. Bagali, Ravikant Patil v. Sarvabhouma S. Bagali,6, Lok Sabha, Ghazipur, merits.27, BHUYAN, J.1, Surya Kant, J., Ujjal Bhuyan, J., Ghazipur, Ghazipur, Lok Sabha, Surya Kant, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sabha, Ghazipur, Ghazipur, e. Balance, Singhvi, K.M. Nataraj, Singhvi, Ravikant S. Patil v. Sarvabhouma S. Bagali6, Singhvi, Rama Narang v., Ravikant S. Patil, Addl, Rama Narang, Bench, Cr, Bench, Navjot Singh Sidhu, Rama Narang, Ravikant S. Patil, Sanjay Dutt v. State, Law, Rama Narang, Ravikant S. Patil, Lok Prahari, S.N. Shukla v., Singhvi, Articles, Rama Narang, Lily Thomas, Navjot Singh Sidhu, Ravikant S. Patil, Ravikant S. Patil, Lily Thomas, Bhikhabhai Kachchadia v. State of Gujarat12, Singhvi, Rahul Gandhi, Ravikant S. Patil, Lok Prahari, Balakrishna Dattatraya Kumbhar15, Rama Narang, Cr, Cr, K. Prabhakaran, Benches, Cr, Rama Narang, Cr, Nirmal Sinha18, Cr, Rama Narang, Cr, Ravikant S. Patil, Order XLI Rule 5, Order XLI, Law, Cr, Cr, Lalsai Khunte, Cr, c. stay, Kumaramangalam, Kumaramangalam, grounds.8, K.T. Shah, H.V. Kamath, Shah, Chairperson, Chairperson, Balakrishna Dattatarya Kumbhar, Cr, Singhvi, Ghazipur

CARDINAL: 24.07.2023, 19, 3.1, five, two, 3.2, one, 2, 19, 3.3, 19, 147, 148, 353, 506, 120B, 147, 148, 149, 307, 302, 404, 120, 4, 19, 120, 436, 427, 5, 171, 188, 5, 19, 188, 3.4, 19, 29.04.2023, 3.6, 19, 2, 16, 8, 19, 3, 35, 4, 5, 12, 5, 1, 15, 16.5, 11, 19, 12, 19, 1, 15, ten, 14, 19, 16, 19, 3, 1, 2, 17, 19, 19, 30.06.2024.25, 30.06.2024, 14.12.2023, 19, 19, 1, 56, 1, 2, 56, 4, 3, 56, five, 56, more than two dozen, 5, 5, one, 6, 568, 56, four, 8, 56, 7, 1, 2, 9, 56, 15, 16.5, 56, three, 16, 19, 16, 19, 56, 14, 8, 2, 13, 56, 1, 6, 14, 5615, 12, 3, 14, 16, 4, 9, 5, 7, 15, 56, 4, 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 18, 16, 16, 1, 2, 3, one, 17, 56, 1, 2, 3, 19, 332, 186, 143, 13, 12, 18, 56, 11, 6 SCC584Page 19, 56, 13, 22, 15, 15, 15, 12, 11, 16, 8, 21, 27, 17, 1, 22, 56, 420, 468, 9, 23, 24, 56, 14, 29, 56, 56, 27, 56, one, 56, 102, 191, 1, 1, 191(1)(e, 29, 3, 1, 2, 19, 30, 56, 7, two, 56, 37, 20, 32, 33, 41, 5, 118, one, 21, 3, 34, 56, 35, 56, 2, One, 56, 56, 38, 56, 39, one, 4, 40, 56, 56, 56

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, scrutiny.22, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Rule 2, Page 26

FAC: the Ghazipur District Development Coordination, Rouse Avenue, the Lok Sabha Secretariat, the Lok Sabha, the Lok Sabha, the Lok Sabha, the Gazette of India, Rama Narang, Rama Narang, Shyam Narain Pandey, Rama Narang, Lalsai Khunte v., Constitutional, the Lok Sabha, the Gazette of India

GPE: Ghazipur, District Ghazipur, New Delhi, District Chandauli, the Gazette of India, Naranbhai, NEW DELHI, decide.12, Solapur, Bombay, Lily Thomas v. Union of India10, Lily Thomas, Lily Thomas, Naranbhai, K.C., conviction.25, India, governance.39, India, India, K. Prabhakaran

LOC: the Ghazipur District, the Scheduled Castes, Executive

WORK_OF_ART: Crime Case No.1051/2007, Lily 1 Crl, Appellant, The Ghazipur, Bench, Gangsters Act, We the People, K. Anandan Nambiar, the Constitution of India

EVENT: the Page 7

PERCENT: 18 SCC114

ORDINAL: firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, 17th, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, second, second, first

NORP: d., Maharashtra, K. Prabhakaran, d., democratic, parliamentarians

TIME: the dawn