Commanding Officer Railway Protection Special Force Mumbai Vs. Bhavnaben Dinshbhai Bhabhor .

Decided On : Sep-26-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 30, the Employees Compensation Act, Page 1, Section 2(34, the Railways Act, Section 2(1)(n)(i, Page 2, Section 4 of the, Section 30, Section 2, Section 3, section 2, Page 3, Section 3 of the 1957 Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 3 of the 1957 Act, Section 2, Page 4, Section 124-A of the, Section 124-A of the 1989 Act, Page 6, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2 of the 1957 Act, Section 2(1)(n)(i, Section 2(34, Section 2(34, Section 10 of the 1957 Act, Section 2, Section 19 of the 1957 Act, Payment of Wages Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 124-A of the 1989 Act, Section 128, Section 124, Section 124-A of the, Section 2(1, Section 3 of the 1957 Act, Page 10, The Indian Railways Act, The Railways Act, Section 2, Page 11, section 2, the Railways Act, Page 12, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, section 2, the Railways Act, Page 13 of 31 (ii, Section 2, Section 2, Page 14, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 197, the Railways Act, Page 15, Act 27, Section 10 of the 1957 Act, Chapter VI-A, Chapter VI-A of the, Section 3, Chapter VI-A of the 1890 Act, Page 16, Chapter VI-A, Section 71E, Section 71E, Chapter VI-A, Section 71, Page 17, Chapter VI-, Act 36, Section 2, Section 2, section 2, Section 124, Section 124A, Section 124 or Section 124A, Section 2, Section 3 of the Railways Claims Tribunal Act, the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Section 128, section 124 or section 124A, Page 19, Chapter XIV, Chapter VI-A of the, Chapter XIV, the Factories Act, the Mines Act 1952, the Merchant Shipping Act, Page 20, Section 3, Section 10, Section 3”.44, Section 3 of the 1957 Act, Section 3, Section 3., Section 3 of the 1957 Act, Section 3., Page 21, Section 10 of the 1957 Act, Section 10, the Indian Railway Act, Chapter VI-A, Section 10, Section 10, the Indian Railways Act, Chapter VI-A, Section 19 of the 1957 Act, Section 19, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Factories Act, Section 19 of the 1957 Act, Section 19, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Factories Act, Section 3 of the 1923 Act, the Civil Appeal No.3592, Chapter II, Section 2, the 1923 Act, Section 2, Section 2, The General Clauses Act, Article 372(2, Article 372 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, a Constitution Bench, Section 87, Section 87 of the Act, Section 87, Section 89, Article 372(2, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, the Constitution of India, The General Clauses Act, Page 27, Section 3 of the 1957 Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2(1)(n)(i, the Railways Act, Page 28, Section 124, Section 124-A of the, Section 19 of the 1957 Act, Section 3 of the 1957 Act, Section 10 of the 1957 Act, Chapter VIA of the 1890 Act, Section 19 of the 1957 Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Factories Act, Page 29, Section 128, Section 124, Section 124-A of the 1989 Act, Page 30

CARDINAL: 2023INSC859, 23.04.2008, 112, 316, 1, 31 2(1)(n, 1, 14, two, 3, 9, 31, 1, 01.07.2004, 1, 31, 1, 8, 31, 1, 1, 1.7.2004, 9, 31, two, 124, 31, 1, 34, 31, 24, 1, 1, 1, 1, 34, 1, 1, three, 31, 1, 1, 1, 9, 31, 71, 31, more than eighty-four hours, 1.7.2004, 1, 37, 125, 18, 31, 3, 54, 128, 1, 2, 1, 31, 131, 63, 20.09.1985, 20.09.1985, 20.09.1985, 31, 1890, 20.09.1985, 9, 48, 22, 31, 20.09.1985, 63, 23, 31, 1, 1, 1, 2, one, 23, less than ten, 1, 26, 31, one, 31, 1.7.2004, 20.09.1985, 31 128, 20.09.1985, 31, 124, 31, 31, 31

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, MUMBAI, the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, the High Court, First Appeal, the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the Workmen Compensation Commissioner, W.C. Case No.05, the Railway Protection Special Force, the Railway Protection Force, RPF, inter alia, the Armed Forces of the Union, the High Court, the High Court, the Armed Forces of the Union, RPF, an Armed Force of the Union, RPF, the High Court, the High Court, RPF, an Armed Force of the Union, inter alia, the Armed Forces of the Union, the Armed Forces of the Union, Entries, RPF, Schedule II, Union of India, Sections 3 and 8 of the 1957 Act, RPF, an Armed Force of the Union, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Orient Treasures Pvt, Union of, RPF, RPF, Entries, RPF, RPF, RPF, RPF, RPF, RPF, RPF, the Armed Forces of the Union, Schedule II, Schedule II, Schedule II, the Armed Forces of the Union, the Royal Indian Marine Service, the Royal Indian Marine Service, the Armed Forces of the Union, Emphasis, Schedule II, Schedule II, Schedule II, the Armed Forces of the Union, Schedule II, Schedule II, the Railway Mail Service, the Indian Posts, Telegraphs Department” Civil Appeal No.3592 of, Force, Sections 71A, 71F, inter alia, the Central Government, inter alia, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Railway Protection Force, the Railway Protection Force Act, Emphasis, Act No.28 of, Civil Appeal No.3592, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Railway Claims Tribunal, the Railway Protection Force Act, the Railway Protection Force, the Railway Protection Force, the Central Government a Force, the Railway Protection Force, Force, the Central Government, the Union to Civil Appeal No.3592 of, the Railway Protection Force, Force, Force, Railway Servants.-, Force, Railway Servant, Railway Servants, Emphasis, Force, Railway, Force, Railway Servants, Railway Servants, Emphasis, State, Force, the RPF50 Having, the Armed Forces of the Union.55, the “Adaptation of Laws Order, Union of India, Court, Court, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Union, Parliament, State, Emphasis, the Adaptation Order of, RPF, RPF, RPF, RPF, RPF, Schedule II, RPF, RPF, RPF, Civil Appeal No.3592, State, RPF, RPF

PERSON: RAILWAY PROTECTION SPECIAL FORCE, Versus BHVANABEN, Vikramjit Banerjee, Shubhendu Anand, Rajan Kr, Prerana Chaturvedi, Schedule II, wherein, Prabhakaran Vijaya, Schedule II, A.O.1937, Schedule II, Railways, Schedule II, van, AIR1952SC332, Fazl Ali, Act No.51, accordingly.64, J.(MANOJ MISRA

NORP: J.1, Workman

DATE: 24.02.2016, 2016, 1923, 1923, 2019, 2010, 27.12.2006, 25 years, monthly, 1989, 2019, 30 days, 2016, 1923, 1957, 2019, 1923, 34, 1923, 1923, 2019, 1989, 2019, 2016, 2008, 2019, 1923, 34, 1923, 1923, the year 1950, 1950, 26 January 1950, 1989, 1923, 1936, 1947, 1948, 2009, 2019, 1923, 1989, 2019, 1923, 1923, 1890, 1989, 1957, 1923, 2009, 31, 1989, 24 of 1989, 2009, 2009, 1923, 1923, 1989, 24 of 1989, 1923, 1923, 2009, 1890, 71B, 71C, 71E, a month, 34, 2003, 34, 1957, 23 of 1957, 1994, 1987, 1989, 1923, 1923, 8 of 1923, 1989, 1948, 35 of 1952, 1957, 23 of 1957, 1958, 44 of 1958, 1985, 1957, 1985, 1985, 47, 1985, 1890, 1985, 1936, 1947, 1948, 1985, 1936, 4 of 1936, 1947, 14 of 1947, 1948, 1923, 1923, 1897, 26 January 1950, 1950, 1912, 4 1989, 2019, 1951, 58, 1950, 1897, 1923, 34, 1989, 34, 2003, 1923, 1989, 1989, 1985, 1985, 1989, 1936, 1947, 1948, 1923, September 26, 2023

ORDINAL: first, first, first

WORK_OF_ART: Railway Servant, the Constitution of India, The Workmen’s Compensation Act, The Workmen’s Compensation Act, The Employee’s Compensation Act, Claims Tribunal, Civil Appeal No.3592, The Armed Forces of the Union, the Constitution of India

PERCENT: 9%

GPE: Chourasia, India, A.O., India, India, India, India, Workmen, week.33, India, India, India, Ramesh Birch, others4, Centre, India, maintainable?.62, New Delhi

EVENT: the 1989 Act, Page 5 of 31 (ii, the 1989 Act, the 1989 Act, Employee’s Compensation Act, the Workmen’s Compensation Act, Page 24 of 3154, Page 25 of 3157, the 1989 Act

FAC: Workmen’s Compensation, Sections 124 and 124A, Sections 124, Railway, Railway, the Delhi Laws Act

PRODUCT: Workman, Section 71C

MONEY: 1890 Act.28

TIME: more than sixty hours, hours, on duty hours

LOC: Executive