Meena Pradhan Vs. Kamla Pradhan

Decided On : Sep-21-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 276, the Indian Succession Act, the Succession Act, Plaintiff No.1.4, Section 63, the Indian Succession Act, Section 68, Indian Evidence Act, Section 63, the Succession Act, Section 68 of the Evidence Act.9, Section 63, the Succession Act

CARDINAL: 2023INSC847, one, two, two, two, more than one, one, 4­, 1, 5, 2, 4, 11, two, two, 6­, at least one, one, one, 7­, 1, 9­, one, 21, 11­

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3351, PRADHAN & ORS, PRADHAN & ANR, KAROL, Suraj Bahadur Limboo, Plaintiffs, VI Additional District, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, the High Court, Probate or Letter of Administration, the Plaintiffs, The Civil Court, Suraj Bahadur Limboo, The High Court, Court, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, the Civil Court, Court, Supp, Yumnam Ongbi, Bench, x. One, the Civil Court, KAROL

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, Meena Pradhan, Ravi Kumar, OF2014herein, Kamla Pradhan, Ritu, Bahadur Pradhan, Lok Bahadur Thapa, Will, Misc, OF20147, Will, xxx8, Will, H. Venkatachala Iyengar v., B.N. Thimmajamma, Bhagwan Kaur, Kartar Kaur, Narayan Bhoir, Narayan Namdeo Kadam, Bench, Ibema Devi v. Yumnam Joykumar Singh, Shivakumar v. Sharanabasappa, Will, Will, Will, Will, Will, Will, Will, Will, Will, Will, Will, Shivakumar, Suraj Bahadur Limboo, Will, Will, J.(ABHAY S. OKA

NORP: J.1

LOC: Bahadur Pradhan

PRODUCT: Appellant No.2 1­, Ku

ORDINAL: first, firstly, secondly, second

DATE: seven days, 30.07.1992, 05.07.1995, 17.11.1995, 1925, 11.12.2001, 2002, 1925, 1959, 1994, 2003, 2009, 2021, September, 2023

GPE: Jabalpur, Jabalpur, Janki, New Delhi

WORK_OF_ART: Succession Case No.22/98, Proof of Execution

TIME: 25.03.2010