Maghavendra Pratap Singh @ Pankaj Singh Vs. The State Of Chhattisgarh

Decided On : Apr-24-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Chapter XII, Section 120­B, the Indian Penal Code, Section 302, Section 201, Section 25(1)(1­b)(a, the Arms Act, the Indian Penal Code, the Arms Act, Section 79 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 302, the Indian Penal Code, Section 120B, the Indian Penal Code, Section 120B, Indian Penal Code, Section 120­B, Section 10 and 30, the Evidence Act, Chapter XII, Section 157, Section 160, Section 161, Section 172, Section 173

CARDINAL: 1, three, 2 3, ten, two, eight, eight, 4, seven, 1959.6, five, 1, 201(1, 5.Mannu, 5, 201(1, 120B, 201(1, Five, Five, 9, five, 6, 6, 49, 7, 12, 8, 487, 13, 2, 13, 8, 17, 9, 97, one, 12.10.2009, three, 11, three, six, 9, four, 9, 22.10.2019, 1, 3, one, 4, 13, 14, four, five, two, 16, one, 17, 11, 2, 18, 6, 31, 156, 19, 96, 20, 3, NCT, 10, 31, 21, 22, three, 24, 23

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, SINGH, KAROL, the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Rs.1000/­, IPC, Rs.1000/­, Rs.1000/­, the District Hospital, PW­24, FIR, the P.S., The Learned Additional District, Session Trial No.76/2010, Sunil Paswan, the Trial Court, The Learned Additional District, the High Court, Convicted, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, IPC, The High Court, Court, First Additional Sessions, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Ashish Agrawal, Naresh Mandal, the High Court, Madvendra, Naresh Mandal, Bablu, Court, Court, PW7, the Public Prosecutor, PW­7, Ashish Agrawal, Court, Court, the High Court's, Uttar Pradesh, WB, the Legal Aid Organisation, Court, Court, U.P. & Ors, the High Court, the First Appellate Court, the High Court, IPC, Court, Court, Court, Union of India, Court, Court, Common Cause v. Union of India, Magistrate, Court, Criminal Investigation — Basic Perspectives, fidelity, Emphasis, Court, Bhagwant Singh v. Commission of Police, Bench, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court of Chhattisgarh, KAROL

NORP: J.1

DATE: 1860, 2013, 1860, 6 months, 7 years, 6 months, 1959 3 years, 6 months, 26.9.2009, 26.9.2009, 1860, 120B, years, years, 49, 2015, 1984, 2006, 2007, daily, 27.9.2009, 1021, 1227, 1997, 1973, 1860, 2021, 1860, 1534, 2022, 57, 1872, 2021, 2014, 2015, 2016, 42, 1983, 2011, 45, 2013, April, 2023

PERSON: not?.2, Maghavendra Pratap Singh, Pankaj Singh, Pankaj Singh, Goverdhan Aggarwal, Prabodh Minz, P­37, Memo under Ex, Sunil Paswan, Pankaj Singh, Pappu Tiwari, Gowardhan Aggarwal, Pappu Tiwari, Pankaj Singh, Abhishek Singh, Sunil Paswan, Sunil Paswan, Maghavendra Pratap Singh, Pankaj Singh, Akhileshwar Pratap Singh @ Lalit Singh, Sidkant Tiwari @ Pappu Tiwari, Mannu Singh, Gyanendra Singh @ Manvendra Singh @ Abhishek Singh, Satish Tripathi, Ganeshdutt Mishra, Pankaj Singh, Akhileshwar Pratap Singh, 120B IPC imprisonment.2, Maghavendra Pratap S. 302,120B, Singh @, Singh 201(1)/120B, Pratap S. 212, Singh @, 120B IPC, Singh @ S. 302/120B, Gyanendra Singh, Manvendra Singh @, Mishra S. 212(1, Maghavendra Pratap Singh, Pankaj Singh, Satish Tripathi, Datt Mishra, Mannu Singh, Sunil Paswan, Pankaj Singh, Avinash Tirki, J.S. Saggu, Madhvendra, Madhvendra, Gowardhan Agrawal, Madhvendra, Avinash Tirki, Vijay Shankar v. State, Sharad Birdhichand Sarda, Sharad Birdhichand Sarda, PW­6, J.S. Saggu, Shri Goverdhan Aggarwal, Sunil Paswan, Pankaj Singh, Sunil Paswan, P­13, Abhishek Singh, Pankaj Singh, Sunil Paswan, Abhishek Singh, mm, mm, Pankaj Singh, Sunil Paswan, Pankaj Singh, Pankaj Singh, Abhishek Singh, two­judge, Geeta Devi Vs, Pankaj Singh, Raipur, Amarnath Chaubey v. Union of India, Manohar Lal Sharma v., Paul B. Weston, Renneth M. Wells, Khan, Pankaj Singh.46, Maghavendra Pratap Singh, J.(B.R. GAVAI

PRODUCT: Judgment, Judgment, P.W. 23, SCC OnLine SC1184

TIME: about 7:00 PM, That night, the evening, about 7:00 PM, 8 to 12 hours

GPE: Ambikapur, Convicted, Impugned, Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh, Pankaj, Singh, Haryana, Bablu, Rajasthan, Rajasthan, Pankaj, States, Abhishek, Sunil, Parveen, Haryana, P.C., Cr, P.C., Pooja Pal v. Union of India, Mohd, Delhi, Singh v. State of Chhattisgarh, New Delhi

QUANTITY: two 9mm, 9mm

FAC: Pankaj Singh's

ORDINAL: second, first