Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Damodhar (d) Thr. Lrs. Vs. Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske And Ors.

Decided On : May-04-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 136 of the Constitution of India, Page 1 of 40, Section 10, Page 8, Section 8, Article 136 of the Constitution of India, Article 136, the Registration Act, Page 13 of, Section 92, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 8, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, Consolidation of Act and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, Exhibit 128, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, Section 9, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, Section 2, the Fragmentation Act, Section 9, the Fragmentation Act, Section 5, the TP Act, Page 16 of 40, Section 54, the TP Act, Section 54, the TP Act and Section 17, the Indian Registration Act, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, Section 36 B, the Fragmentation Act, Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, Section 9(3, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, Section 31, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, Page 21, the Fragmentation Act, Section 36A, the Fragmentation Act, Section 36B, the Fragmentation Act, Section 36B, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, Section 36B, the Fragmentation Act, Section 36B, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, Consolidation of Act and Prevention of Fragmentation Act, the ‘Fragmentation Act, the ‘Fragmentation Act, the ‘Fragmentation Act, Section 9, Section 8, Section 9, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, the Fragmentation Act, Section 9, the Fragmentation Act, Section 54, Section 17, Section 67, the Evidence Act, Page 35, the Fragmentation Act, Section 54, the Registration Act, Page 39

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, Damodhar Narayan Sawale, Tejrao Bajirao Mhaske & Ors, JUDGMENT C.T. RAVIKUMAR, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, the Court of Additional District Judge, the Court of Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chikhli in Regular Civil Suit, the Court of Civil Judge, the High Court, Court, Regular Civil Suit, Tejra Bajirao Mhaske, SLP, SLP, Page 3 of 40, Page 4, Rs.1500/-, Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, Court, Plaintiff, Defendants, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Page 7 of, the First Appellate Court, Court, the First Appellate Court, the First Appellate Court, The First Appellate Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, Court, Court, Court, Article, the Supreme Court, this Court in Charanjit & Ors, State of Punjab & Anr.1, Sulemanbhai Ajmeri & Ors, the High Court, the First Appellate Court, Court, the First Appellate Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Ext, the First Appellate Court, the First Appellate Court.13, Court, Court, Ext, Court, Court, Court, the First Appellate Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the First Appellate Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, No Civil Court, Mamlatdar’s Court, the State Government, Civil Court, Mamlatdar’s Court, the Civil Court, Mamlatdar’s Court, CPC, the Civil Courts, Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings, a Civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Civil Court, Mamlatdar’s Court, Civil Court, a Civil Court, CPC, Rule 6A, CPC, CPC, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, CPC, Court, Court, sic.no.9, Plaintiff, the High Court, Ext, the First Appellate Court, the High Court, the High Court, Ext, The High Court, the High Court, Court, CPC, Ext, the First Appellate Court, the High Court, the High Court, above.32, the First Appellate Court, the High Court, the First Appellate Court, the First Appellate Court, the High Court, CPC, the High Court, Court, Ext, the High Court, Ext, Civil Court, Ext, Sections 91 and 92 of the Evidence Act, the High Court, Page 38, the Transfer of Property Act and Section 17, Ext, the First Appellate Court, the High Court, the First Appellate Court, the High Court of Judicature, Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Chikhli in Regular Civil Suit, the Court of Additional District Judge, Regular Civil Suit

DATE: 2023, 2016, 1995, 1987, 2023, 1985, 1979, 21.05.1979, 2023, Rs.10,000/-, 2023, 22.11.2017, 21.04.1979, 2023, 12 months, 1947, 1946, annual, 2023 4, the Defendant No.2, 2023, 2023, 1987, 2023, 27.04.1979, 1995, 2023 9, 15.10.2015, 21.04.1979, 2023, 2013, 2014, 2023, the Page 12, 2023, 1882, 1908, 2023, 1872, under Section 36A, 2023, 2023, 1882, 2023, 54, 1908, 2023, a little later, 2023, under Section 36A, 2023 21, 1908, 2023 first, 15th day of, November, 1965, 2017, 2023, the year 1979, 2023, 2023, 2023, 3 (1996, 2006, 2023, 9 hereinabove.28, 2023, 2023, the Defendant No.2, 2023, 2023, 21.04.1979, 2023, 21.04.1979, 1882, 42, 2023, 2023, 2023, months, 2023, 2023, 2023, 1995, 1985, 1987, 1985, May 04, 2023, 2023

PERSON: Versus Shri, Nagpur Bench, Buldana, Buldana, Khasra No.20/2, Taluk Chikhli, District Buldana, Ramakrishna Ganpat Mhaske, Nos, ISSUES FINDINGS.1, Written, Ex, Nos, herein, determination.22, Mohan Chawla, Anr, Dera Radha Swami Satsang & Ors.3, Rohit Singh, Gangalgaon, Rohit Singh’s Case, Nagpur Bench, Buldana, J.(C.T. Ravikumar

NORP: J.1, approached.33

CARDINAL: 30.10.2015, 20, 2, 21.04.1979, 25.04.1979, 40, 20, 20, 2 to 6, 7, 128, 40, 128, two, less than 2, 5, 40, 6, 6, 40, 9, 14, 40, 128, 128, 40, 128, 128, 113, 128, 9, 40, 1, 2, 2, 3, 40, 128, 1, 11, 7, 11, 40, 20, No.3, 40, 128, 128, 21.04.1979, 7, 128, 21.04.1979, 40, 1, one, 14, 14, 40, 16, 16, 20, 1, 2, 15, 40, 1, 5, 1, 5, one, one, one, 17, 40, 18, 40, 36A., 1, 19, 40, 1, 1, 40, 3, 40, 21.04.1979, 36B, 22, 40, 23, 40, 6, 40, 1, 4, 12, 40, 4, No.2, 26, 40, 26, 26, 27, 40, No.2, 24, 24, 128, 28, 40, 15, 128, 1, 24, 24, 1, 29, 40, 30, 40, 128, 31, 40, 2023, 21.04.1979, 1, 21.04.1979, one, 32, 40, 21.04.1979, 40, 2023, 3.20, 20, 24, 40, 26, No.2, 113, No.2, 20, 40, one, 20, 40, about nine, 128, 128, 24, 128, 128, 128, 37, 40, one, 128, 40, 128, 40, 30.10.2015, 40, 40

ORDINAL: Second, second, second, first, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, first, second, first, first, firstly, secondly, second, second, second, Second, second, first, second, first, second, first, second, second, first, second, second, first, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, first, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, first, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, first, second, first, second, second, first, first, first, second, second, first, first, second, second, first, second, first, second, second, first, first, second, Second

GPE: Bombay, Gangalgaon, Exh.128, Exh.128, Adambai, Ext.128, Ext.128, Ext.128, Ext.128, Ext.128, Ext.128, Ext.128, Gangalgaon village, Ext, Ext.128, Ext.128, Bombay, New Delhi

QUANTITY: 3 Acres, 3 acres, over 2 acres, one acre, 2 acres, 2 acres, one acre, one acre, 1 acre, one acre, one acre, one acre, one acre, one acre, 3 acres 20, 2 acres, one acre, one acre, 2 acres, one acre, 2 acres, 3 acres 20, one acre, one acre

LOC: the District Judge

PRODUCT: No.1, No.9, No.9, No.2 Page 34

FAC: Serial No.[2

MONEY: 2023 Registration Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //