Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited Vs. Renew Wind Energy (rajkot) Private Limited

Decided On : Apr-13-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 125, the Electricity Act, Section 86, Section 62, Section 181 of the Act, Section 86, Section 61 of the Act, Section 64, Section 111, Section 125 of the Act, Section 64, the REC Regulations 2010, the REC Regulations 2010, Order No.2 of 2006, the REC Regulations 2010, Section 86(1)(e, the Second Amendment, Article No.5.2 12, the Second Amendment, the National Action Plan on Climate Change, the REC Regulations 2010, Second Amendment, Rule 15 820, the Second Amendment, Transmission 20 Rule 8, section 79, section 79, section 86, Article 1.1, the Second Amendment, the Second Amendment, Section 3 of the Act, Section 86(1)(b, Section 86(1)(b, Section 86 of the Act, Section 86, Section 86(1, Section 3 of the Act, the REC Regulations 2010, section 86, Article 5.2 of the PPA, Article 5.2 of the PPA, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Contract Act, Section 61 of the Act, Section 62 of the Act, Section 64, Section 86, Section 63, Section 64, Section 62, Regulation 85, Section 86(1)(b, the Electricity Act, Section 61 of the Act, Section 62, Section 64, Section 86, Section 42, Section 63, Article 5.2 of PPA, the REC Regulations, the REC Regulations 2010, the Second Amendment, the REC Regulations, the Second Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Second Amendment, the Second Amendment, The Constitution Bench, Section 178, Section 79(1, Section 79(1, Section 178, Section 178, Section 111, Section 178, Section 178, Section 79(1)(g, Section 178, Section 79(1)(j, Section 178, Section 79(1, Section 178, Section 178 of the Act, Section 178, Section 178, Section 178, Section 178, Section 79(1)(j, Section 178, Section 178, Section 79(1)(j, Section 111 of the 2003 Act, Section 178, Section 2, the Second Amendment, Rule 5, Order 6 Rule 4

CARDINAL: 1, 06.12.2018, 24.07.2020, 14.10.2020, 3, 25.2, 4, 15.02.2019, 6, two, two, 5, 5, 1, 6, 10, 2.2, 3, 8, two, 11, 29.03.2012, 9, two, 13, 2, 1, 15, 06.12.2018, 24.07.2020, 11.07.2013, 16, 11, 17, 14, 1.1, 29.03.2012, 13, more than one and half years, 19, 14, 11.07.2013, two, 11.07.2013, 1, 1, two, two, one, 8, 1, 16, 26, two, 5, 21, 19, 20, two, 21, two, 3, 23, 24, 1)(e, 25, 1, 1, two, 2, 1, 26, 7, 1, 4, 4.1, 3, 2, 1, 5.2, 29, 1, 3, 295.2, 2.64, 23.10, 3.56, No.1, 5.3, 25, 3, 1, 2, 5, 31, 07.05.2011, 32, 11, two, 26, 31-12-2011, 31-12-2011, 20.06.2001, 34, 39, 20-6-2001, 53, One, 14, 5, 990, 10, 36, 64, two, two, 22, 13, 5.3, 5.4, 62, 13, two, 40, 1, 9, 2, 41, 1, 58, 29.03.2102, 60, 1, 2, 44, 40, 40, one, 43, 46, 17, 39, 33, 6, 905, 23, 31, 1, 34, 12, 67, 9.19, one, 11, 700, 42, one, 4, 958 37, 12, 72, 51, 13, 04-2023

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, APTEL, the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory 1 Civil Appeals Nos, the State Commission, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, APTEL, Gujarat Urja, APTEL, APTEL, Gujarat Urja, MW Wind Turbine Generators, the Renewable Energy Certification, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Wind Independent Power Producers Association, Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, the State of Gujarat, State Commissions, State, Sections 62, the Appropriate Commission, the State Commission, The State Commissions, State Commission, State, State, The State Commission, The Gujarat State Commission, APTEL, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, Recognition, Renewable Energy Certificate, Kerala State Electricity Board & Anr, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Central Commission, the State Agency, the Appropriate Commission, REC, REC Regulations, the State Commission, RPO, inter alia, State, Order, Commission, the Wind Energy Tariff, Commission, the State Commission, Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, RPO, State Commission, Floor Price, Central Commission, the State Commission, RPO, The State Commission, Central Commission, the REC Regulations, APCC, the Central Commission, Order No.2/2012 14, the Appropriate Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Central Commission, the State Commission, Gujarat Urja, APTEL, APTEL, APTEL, State Commission’s, APTEL, the State Commission, Central Commission, the State Commission, APPC, RPO, Reliance, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, the State Commission, State Commission, the REC Regulations, the Central Commission, Average Power Purchase Cost, APTEL, CERC, the Statement of Reasons, the Union Ministry of Power, Tariff Policy, the State Commission, inter alia, APPC, APPC, Commission, APPC, APPC, the REC Regulations, Pooled Power Purchase Cost of the subsequent year, the State Commission, APPC, CERC, the Central Commission, the state commission, APTEL, the Electricity Rules, the Central Government, the Central Commission, CERC, GERC/State, WPDs-Respondents, APPC, RPO, the Impugned Order, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, Solar Semi-Conductors Power Company (Pvt) Ltd (Supra, the Central Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, State, Power Purchase Agreement, the Central Commission, 16 Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd v Sai Renewable Power Private Limited, Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v EMCO Limited, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v, Solar Technologies, Pvt Ltd & Others23, Respondents, Respondents, CERC Regulations, Court, Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd, Central Bank of India, Hartford Fire Insurance Co., Haribai Patel & Ors25, State Commission, Reliance, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission Comprehensive (Conduct of Business) Regulations, Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, APPC, REC, REC, APPC, CERC, Statement of Reasons, the Central Commission, REC, REC, APPC, APPC, Commission, APPC, APPC, Commission, APPC, RE Projects, APPC, Appropriate, State Commission, the State Commission, inter alia, APPC, APPC, APPC, APPC, REC, APPC, the State Commission, REC Regulations, CERC, inter alia, APPC, APPC, Floor Price/ Forbearance, APPC, APPC, APPC, APPC, REC, APPC, APTEL, Reliance, PTC India Ltd., CERC, the CERC Regulations, State, S.C.R. 609 22 Commission, State Commission, the National Electricity Policy, the State Commission, the State Commission, Gujarat Urja’s, State Commission, the State Commission, APPC, APPC, MW).2739, State Commission, State Commissions, Distribution Licensees 27 Physical Progress (Achievements) Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, The National Tariff Policy, the Central Government, Appropriate Commission, the REC Regulations, the State Agency, the Appropriate Commission, Hindustan Zinc Ltd., Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission,28, the National Electricity Policy of, the Tariff Policy of, the Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, Quantum, Renewable Purchase Obligation, RPO, RPO, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission’s Tariff, Gujarat SLDC, Gujarat SLDC, State energy Account (SEA, APPC, APPC, APPC, MW, REC, Commission, GEDA, ABT, the State Commission, The State Commission’s, inter alia, MW, the state commission, the Central Commission, the State Commission, the Multi Year Tariff Regulations, the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, APTEL, REC Regulations, Emco Ltd, the Gujarat State Commission, Court, Commission, Projects, xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx, the Income Tax Rules, xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx, Tribunal, Project, Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd, the state commission, the A.P. Transmission Corporation, Commission, the Regulatory Commission’s, The A.P. Transmission Corporation’s, APTEL, the A.P. Transmission Corporation, APTRANSCO/Board, Tribunal, PPAS, Tribunal, the Regulatory Commission, PPAS, the Regulatory Commission, Tribunal, Solar Power Company India Pvt, Solar Power Company India Pvt. Ltd, the State Commission, Court, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Tarini Infrastructure Ltd.31, S.C.R., Commission, Commission, Commission, Court, A.P. TRANSCO v., Sai Renewable Power, the State Regulatory Commission, Solar Power Company India Pvt, Court, Commission, Court, Commission, Commission, the Conduct of Business Regulations, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., EMCO Ltd., Bangalore Electricity Supply Co. Ltd., Konark Power Projects Ltd. &, Commission, Regulations, Power Purchase Agreements, the Power Purchase Agreements, Commission, Power Purchase, Commission, Commission, Gujarat Urja, State Regulatory Commission, APPC, Gujarat Urja, Renewable Energy Certificates, Power Exchange, Exchange, Gujarat Urja, the State Commission, APTEL, Gujarat Urja, the REC Regulations, the Central Agency, the Forum of Regulators, the REC Regulations, the Central Commission, State Commissions, the REC Regulations, a State Agency, Regulation 2, the REC Regulations, the State Commission, Appropriate, WPD, APTEL, the State Commission, Gujarat Urja, the Official Gazette, APPC, APPC, Commission, APPC, Court, the Central Commission, Court, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Central 45 Commission, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, CERC, PTC India, Purbanchal Cables & Conductors, Assam State Electricity Board & Ors.33, S.C.R., Income Tax v Vatika Township, Phillips, L'Office Cherifien des Phosphates v., Shinnihon Steamship Co. Ltd., Union of India v. Indusind Bank, The State Commission, the REC Regulations, APTEL, The State Commission, the State Commission, Respondents, the State Commission, Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Ltd, Vesta Patel & Ors, Nirmala Jayprakash Tiwari& Ors.36, New Indian Assurance Co. Ltd, S.C.R., the State Commission, APTEL, the State Commission’s, Gujarat Urja, APTEL, APTEL, the State Commission, APTEL, Appellant(s, IA No.77529/2020 - GRANT OF INTERIM RELIEF, Adv, Adv, Respondent(s, Court, ORDER, Bench, the State Commission, APTEL, HARSHITA UPPAL, MATHEW, NSH

DATE: 3480-3481, 2003, 3480, 3481, Multi-Year, 29.01.2010, 2020, 2010, 2010, the previous year, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, the period 11.08.2009 to 10.08.201211, monthly, three years, 17.05.2009, 1st July, 2009.However, 10th August, 2009, three) years w.e.f, August, 2009, 17.04.2010, 2010, 25 years, 11.07.2013, 2010, 2010, the previous year, 2010, 25 years, year-on-year, 2010, 2017, the previous year, 2010, 2013, 08.08.2012, before 11.07.2013, 28-01-2016, the month of December 2013, 2010, 10.12.2013, 2013, year-on-year, 11.07.2013, 2010, 25 years, 2005, year-on-year, December 2013, 21 (2010, 2016, 2017, 2011, 24 AIR1965SC128825 2001, 2019, 2001, 2013, 10.07.2013, 2010, annual, every year, 2010, a period of, 25 years, year-to-, year, the decade and a half, the years, the 1990s, the last few years, February 2023, April 1, 2006, 2010, the previous ·year, 44, 2005, 2006, 2010, 2015, 1104 27, a year, a year, a particular year, 28 43, any year, Monthly, every month, 2010-11, monthly, the previous year, 10 years, 2010, monthly, twenty five) years, 30 45, 2019, 2001, 2013, 49, 27.01.2012, 25 years, 33 13, 1994-1995, the base year, 1994, the base year, annually, 2003-04, 10 years, 35, 42, 20-6 2001, 2017, 115 31, 2016, 36, under 37, 2010, 38 54, 32 (2016, 25 years, 2010, 2010, 2010, the previous year, 2010, three years, 42 10.08.2009, 25 years, 25 years, the first year to the twenty fifth year, 11th August, 2009, 2010, 2010, 10.07.2013, 10.12.2013, 43, 10th July, 2013, 2003, 2012, 47 40, 1992, today, today, today, tomorrow, 1870, 1994, a little later, 2014, 1037, 35 (2016, 49 68, 2010, 1951, 2014, April 13, 2023 52, 3480-3481/2020, today

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, Renew Wind Energy, Tariff Order, Principal, Syed Institute, Wish Wind, C.A. Sundaram, Solar Semi-Conductors Power Limited Company, WPDs-, Distribution Licensee, Sundaram, Ltd24, Shyam Divan, Dhruv Mehta, GERC, Distribution Licensee, GERC, Findings 37, Regulations, GERC, Distribution Licensee, Emco, Kurian Joseph, Distribution Licensees/, Law, Bishundeo Narain v. Seogeni, KISHAN KAUL, J.[M. M. SUNDRESH, SECTION XVII S U P R E M E C O U R T O, KISHAN KAUL, HON'BLE S. RAVINDRA BHAT, M.M. SUNDRESH, Appellant(s, Hemantika Wahi, Jesal Wahi, Srishti Khindaria, Nishtha Kumar, Vishal Gupta, Nikilesh Ramachandran, Nitin Saluja, Justice S. Ravindra, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M.M. Sundresh

NORP: J.1, Certificates, c., Forbearance, Projects, allegans

WORK_OF_ART: APTEL, 01.07.20154, Gujarat Urja”, 7 Clause 181(2)(zd, REC Regulations, Pooled Cost of Purchase', APPC, State Regulations, Second Amendment, APPC, Renewable Sources Regulations, Regulation 21, The Preamble of the Act, the Explanation to Regulation 5, Regulations, Reportable Judgment

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, second, third, fourth, fifth, first, second, fourth, third, third, 11th, 10th, 11th, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, Firstly, Secondly, third, fourth, third, first, second, first, First, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, First, First, first, Secondly, first, second, Second, third, third, second, first, first, firstly, secondly, first, first, first

GPE: Gujarat, the State of Gujarat, District Rajkot, Gujarat, law.5, of.12, India, Savjibai, States, India, India, India, USA, Denmark, India, India, India, India, Govt, India, T&D, Gujarat, States, India, India, S.C.R., New Delhi

FAC: the Multi-Year Tariff Order, the Gujarat Urja, Regulation 4, Regulation 45, Shanti Budhiya

QUANTITY: 9 Regulation 5(1)(c, 42,015 megawatts

PRODUCT: order10, case18, Respondent, Respondent No.1, Regulation 9, Component, Regulation 9, Appellant

MONEY: 3.56, 2.64, 3.56, 2.64, 2.64/-, ₹ 2.64, 2.64, ₹ 2.64, 2.25/-, 2.25/-, ₹2.64, 1.50, 3.56, ₹ 2.64, 3.56

TIME: the 15 minutes, 06.04.2023 at 20:30 hours

PERCENT: 85%, 10%, 5%, 5%

EVENT: Regulation 5, Regulation 5, the Multi Year Tariff Regulations, Multi Year Tariff, Multi Year Tariff, Regulation 2, Multi Year Tariff, Regulation 36, the 2004 Regulations, the REC Regulations, the 2003 Act