Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/s Suneja Towers Private Limited Vs. Anita Merchant

Decided On : Apr-18-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 2(d, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 2 of the Act of, Section 2, the Provisional Booking, section 2(d, Section 36, MRTP Act, Section 66(1)(A, the MRTP Act, Section 16, Section 5, Section 23, the Trusts Act, Section 8, Section 7, Section 3, Section 12, the MRTP Act, Section 12-B(3, the MRTP Act and Section 14(1)(d, Article 136 of the Constitution of India, MRTP Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 14 of the Act of, Section 12-B of the Act, Section 12, Section 12-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Section 12, Rule 8, Order 1 of the First Schedule to the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 12-B of the, Section 144 CPC, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 12-B(3, Section 12-B(3, the Consumer Protection Act, Act 62 of 2002, Section 12-B of the MRTP Act, Section 12-B MRTP Act, Section 12-B of the MRTP Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, NOS, OF2022 M/S, Contents Preliminary, The State Commission, the National Commission, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the National Commission, the State Consumer, Disputes Redressal Commission, The District Forum, the National Commission’, the State Commission, the State Commission, the District Forum, Competition Appellate, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Court, The National Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Court, Court, Court, the National Commission, District Forum, Court, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Court, District Consumer, the State Commission, Vaishali, Uttar Pradesh, Non-Resident Indian, C-602, C-603, National Commission, State Commissions, inter alia, the provisional Allotment of the, Citibank NA New Delhi, the Letter of Provisional Allotment, Provisional Allotment, Provisional, Rs.2,70,202.40, The District Forum, inter alia, Civil Court, Karkardooma Courts, Consumer Protection Act, The State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, District Forum, The State Commission, Commission, Ghaziabad Development Authority, Court, The State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the Commission/Forum, Commission, the Opposite Party, Ghaziabad Development Authority Vs, Supreme Court, Court, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Court, the State Commission, Supreme Court of, Smt, Smt, Supreme Court, Court, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Court, Malay Kumar Ganguly, CPJ17(SC, The State Commission, Ops, Supreme Court of, Supreme Court of, CPJ17(SC, Ops, the National Commission 7, the State Commission, the National Commission, The National Commission, Court, inter alia, the Opposite Party, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Complaint, The Opposite Party, Commission, Commissions, Hon’ble Supreme Court, Court, the National Commission, the State Commission, the Opposite Party, the State Commission, Supreme Court, the State Commission, Revision Petitions, the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants, Court, Central Bank of India v. Ravindra, Clariant International Ltd., Anr, Securities & Exchange Board of India, Court, Experion Developers Pvt, Sushma Ashok Shiroor, SCC273 Ireo Grace Realtech Pvt. Ltd., DLF Home Developers Limited, Capital Greens Flat Buyers Association and Ors, Ors, DLF Southern Homes Pvt Ltd and Ors, DLF Home, Panchkula Pvt Ltd and Ors, Ireo Grace Realtech, Court, the National Commission, Court, Ghaziabad Development Authority, Court, the State Commission, the National Commission, the State Commission, Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, U.P. Public Service Commission, Allahabad, Court, Rs.31,87,131/-, Court, Court, the State Commission, the National Commission, Court, Court, Court, Court, Indian Council, Court, Court, Court, Court, Government, Vaishali, Vaishali, CPWD, Court, the National Commission, Court, the State Commission, Court, Transmission Corp., AP Ltd., Balram Prasad v. Kunal Saha, Indian Council for Enviro- Legal Action, Court, English Courts, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, the National Commission, Transmission Corp. of, AP Ltd., Balram Prasad, the State Commission, the National Commission, State Commission, Court, DLF Homes Panchkula Pvt Ltd, Court, Court, inter alia, SCDRC/NCDRC, NCDRC, NCDRC, Court, Court, Court, NCDRC, NCDRC, NCDRC, DLF Ltd., ABA, DLF Homes Developers Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Court, DLF Southern Homes, Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd., Court, the National Commission, Ireo Grace Realtech, Court, Court, Court, Chart, C9, C11, the Municipal Corporation, RERA, the 41 National Commission, Chart, the National Commission, IREO Grace Realtech, Court, p.a, IREO Grace Realtech, SI, Clause 21.3, NBCC, Court, Court, inter alia, NCDRC, Central Bank of India v. Ravindra, NCDRC, NCDRC, Court, p.a, The National Commission, Court, Court, the Real Estate (Regulation and Development Act, Commission, the National Commission, Court, Commission, Commission, Ireo Grace Realtech, P) Ltd., Court, Court, the State Commission, the National Commission, Court, Civil Appeals Nos, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, Dr (Ms) Manjeet Kaur Monga, Tribunal, Ghaziabad Development Authority, Tribunal, Sections 36-A(1)(i, Civil Appeals Nos, Commission, the Central Government, State Government, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Citibank, Citibank, Bank, Civil Appeals Nos, Court, Citibank N.A., Citibank N.A., Citibank, Bank, Bank, Bank, Bank, Reserve Bank of India, regard.8, Tribunal, Citibank, the Tribunal, Citibank N.A., Connaught Circus, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, Citibank, Tribunal.10, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, Banker's Cheque, the MRTP Commission, Commission, Rule 4, CPC, Tribunal, Commission, Party, Court, the Competition Appellate Tribunal, Court, Court

DATE: 2892-2894, 2020, 2020, 2020, 2014, 2014, 2006, 2006, 2006, 19864, 2018, 19697, 1986, four weeks, three weeks, one week, four weeks, today, the second week of July, 01.08.1989, 1375, 15.10.2005, 16 years, 1986, 15 days, a period of, 15 days, 08.11.2005, 2002, early Feb. 2002, Feb. 2002, the year 2002, January, 2004 or, Feb.2002, 07 November 2005, 3 years of the date, the year 1989, 16 years, one month, 16 years, 1986, 2004, 2004, three years, more than one decade, 12 years, 22.05.2002, 1989, 29, 2009, 2009, the year 2015, 2018, 1986, 1986, 2006, 1993, 1882, 1972, 2015, 1918, 2002, 2004, 2022, 2021, 2021, 2021, 2020, 2020, the year 1989 to the month of June, 2022, today, 2010, 11, 2007, the year 1989, 39 years of age, 36 months i.e., the year 1992, 1994, about the years 2003-2005, the year 2002, 08.11.2005, 15.10.2005, 20.02.2002, 25.01.2004, 1986, 1986, 1986, about 34 years, the age of 73 years, about 12 to 15 years, 29 to 34 years, 1975, 28 9.3.1, 2011, 1986, 29-34 years, three decades, 29-34 years, 1989-1994, 1991, 1989, 2016, 1989, 1989, the next 32 years, the year 1989, 1989, the decades, 31 years, the year 2005, 08.11.2005, 2003, 2014, more than a decade, 1986, 36, three decades, 1986, 3816, 1986, 2019, 2019, thirty-six months, 2020, 2019, 2019, 40 14.3.1, 2017, 2017, every month, 12 months, quarterly, 2019, 2019, 4252, a period of, three months, over 7 months, one-year, two and a half years, 2002, 2,00,000.14.6, 23.07.2018, 24.07.2018, 2016, 1986, 44 29, 10484-85, 2016, 10481-82, 5032-33, 2015, 42 to 44, 2001, 12 years, Between 2002 and 2005, 42, 2008, more than 25 years, three years, between August 1989, October 1993, more than one decade, 15 years, more than 12 years, 2005, 2009, 4,53,850, a period of, three months, today, 47 3, 1989, 10484-85, 2016, 10481-82, 5032-33, 1969, 1908, 1908, 2015, 10484-85, 2016, 5032-33, 2016, 2016, 2015, 5012, 30th April, 1989, October 1993, May 2016, the past period, 1986, 1986, 1986, 15.03.2003 53

CARDINAL: 8163, 5, 11, 17, 19, 35, 37, 45, 57, 67, 69 1, 771, 772, 773, 12.03.2020, 121, 122, 123, 2.1, three, three, 20.12.2013, 1, 2, 3, 2, three, 2.2, 12.03.2020, 14, 4, 5, 6 ‘, 3, 1,48,52,000/-, 1, 4, 11.11.2020, 25.11.2020, 1, 2022.4, 5, 5.1, No.2, three, three, 12, 5.2, 6, 5, 7 5.3, 10,68,031/-, 2, Eight, Thirty Thousand, 45,000/-, Ten, 83, Ten, 30.11.2005, 26.11.2001, 2, 3, 9, three, one, 1, 2, Fourteen, 24,758,00/- 10, 3, 4, three, 7, two, 6, 6.1, 11, 19, three, 12, 5, 21, 5, One, 14, 29, 29, 14, three, 26.12.2001, 15, 36, 37, two, two, 12.03.2020, 166-167, 6.4, 16, 30, 30, 12.03.2020, 17, 32, 34, 18, 8, six, 1., 1, 8, 5, 3, 5, 16, 16, 49,87,129/-, 2,55,95,119/-, 8.3, 7.35, 21, 4.5, three, 13.35, three, 2.04, 2.25, 10, 8.4, 22, 8.5, 5, 3, 3, 23, 8.6, 10,68,031/-, 24, 84,76,540/-, 9.1, 3, 3, 25, 25.04.2005, 9.2, 30.04.2005, 09.02.2002, 269.2.1, 27, 9.3, No.2, 8, 9.4, 9.5, 29, 9.6, 17.52, 30, 9.6.1, 850, 74,200, 87.3, 9.6.2, 31, 3, 3, 9.06, 3, 1.94, 9.7., 32, 30.04.2005, 30.11.2005, 25.11.2020, 1, 9.8, 33, 6, 1, 34, 12, 35, two, 12.1, 13, 37, 14.1, 15, 69, 2, 1., eleven, three, 39, 3, one, two, 16, 5, 3, 37, 14.4, 3, 47, 30-6-2020, 27-11-2018, 13, 1, 1, 39.].14, 2,00,000, 43, 2,06,41,379/-, 28, 2,06,41,379/-, 15, 2016.2, 3-8-2015, 37, 37, three, three, 4,53,850, 26, 22, 7, 46, 4,53,850, 7, 30-4-2005, 30-4, 12, 2, 1, one, 5, 3, 1, 4, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 30, 4,53,750, 22-6-2016, 49, 1, 1, 30-4-2005, 1, 124, 9.2, 30-4-2005, 9.3, 30-4-2005, 6 to 11, 31, 2005.33, 51, 1, 8, 16.1

GPE: 31.03.2022, 09.05.2022, New Delhi, Ghaziabad, Client, Client, Client, Client, Client, Client, Delhi, India, p.a., p.a., India, India, jurisdiction.36, p.a., p.a., p.a., K.L., India, p.a., p.a., p.a., Ghaziabad, Ghaziabad, p.a., p.a., India, p.a., p.a., p.a., p.a., A2, p.a., p.a., p.a., p.a., p.a., p.a., p.a., p.a., New Delhi, New Delhi, New Delhi, p.a.

PERSON: Nos, Manjeet Kaur Monga, K.L., Manjeet Kaur Monga, Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Supriya Juneja, Disputes Redressal Forum, K.L. Suneja, Nos, Rs.4,44,625/-, Rs.2,87,522.50, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Complainant, Forum, Balbir Singh, Balbir Singh, Complainant, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Kaur Monga, K.L. Suneja, Manjit Kaur, Gursharan Kaur, Gursharan Kaur, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Sukumar Mukherjee, Kaur Monga, K.L. Suneja, Manjeet Kaur Monga’s, Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga’s, Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga’s, Monga, Complainant, Foras, Foras, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Complainant, Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga’s, Fora, Shri Ram Trivedi, Abhishek Khanna, Anr, Dhanda, Manohar Lal, Lrs, Ugrasen, Lrs, Fora, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Bench, Sanjay Singh, Anr, Anr, Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga’s, Manjeet Kaur Monga’s, Anr, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Sidharth Luthra, Kaur Monga, Monga, Kaur Monga, Monga, Kaur Monga’s, Kaur Monga’s, Wallersteiner, Q.B. 373, Monga, Monga, Monga, K.L. Suneja, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Monga, Monga, P. Surya Bhagavan, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Fora, Manjeet Kaur Monga’s, Monga, Monga, Monga, Manohar Lal, Fora, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Arifur Rahman Khan, Rasheed Ahmad Usmani, Bench, Arifur Rahman Khan, Govindan Raghavan, Arifur Rahman Khan, Bench, B7, Subodh Pawar, Surendra Arora, Surendra Arora, Bench, Manjeet Kaur Monga’s, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga v., K.L., Manjeet Kaur Monga v., Kaur, Ved Prakash Aggarwal, Ved Prakash Aggarwal, Kaur, Gursharan Kaur, Gursharan Kaur, UTPE No.90, Gursharan Kaur, Manjeet Kaur Monga v., K.L. Suneja, Hiten P. Dalal, Hiten P. Dalal, Kaur Monga v., Jeevan Bharti Building, Order XXI, Pay Order, Demand Draft, Pay Order, Pay Order, Order XXI, Sailen Krishna Majumdar, Malik Labhu Masih, Sailen Krishna Majumdar, Malik Labhu Masih, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga, Manjeet Kaur Monga

FAC: C-284, Siddharth Shila Apartments, the District Forum, 09.05.2022, Siddharth Shila Apartments

PERCENT: 60%, 14%, 14%, 14%, more than 60%, more than 60%, more than 60%, 18%, 60%, 60%, 60%, 15%, 15%, 14%, 14%, 14%, 6% to 9%, 20%, 9%, 60%, only 25%, 14%, 14%, 14%, 60%, 15%, 15.95%, about 20%, 15%, 15%, 25%, 14%, 18%, 14%, 6% to 9%, 6%, 9%, 7%, 6%, 7.9%, 20%, 7.90%, 0.9% to 1%, 20%, 10%, 9%, 12%, 20%, 7%, 7%, 10%, 10%, 24%, 9%, 9%, 6% to 9%, 15%, 15%, 15%, 15%, 15%, 15%

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, C-603, Compat, SCC367

ORDINAL: 6th, first, first, first, second, third, fourth, Fifthly, sixth, third, Secondly, Secondly, first, first, first, second, 4th, Secondly, first, 4th, 7th

NORP: Cheque, Cheque

WORK_OF_ART: 36…, Malay Kumar Gangully, Flat B-301

EVENT: SCC557

MONEY: 6 per cent, SCR817

QUANTITY: 7.5 per square foot, 7.5 per square foot

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //