Abhishek Singh Vs. Huhtamaki Ppl Ltd.

Decided On : Mar-28-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: section 9, section 9, section 12, section 7 or section 9, section 10, section 12A, Rule 11, Article 142 of the Constitution, Article 142 of the Constitution, section 14, section 66, section 66, Rule 11, Rule 11, Article 142 of the Constitution that IBBI Regulations, section 240, section 240, section 240, section 12A, section 12A, Rule 11, section 7, Rule 11, Section 12A, Section 62, Rule 11, Rule 11, section 9

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, SLP, Corporate, Manpasand Beverages Ltd., the National Company Law 1, No.503, the Corporate Insolvency, Operational, Huhtamaki PPL Ltd., NCLT, IB, No.503, NCLT, NCLT, Rs.45.72, IRP, IBC, the National Company Law Appellate, NCLAT, NCLAT, Adjudicating Authority, Court, Application, the Respondent No.2 M/s.Manpasand Beverages Ltd., NCLAT, the Suspended Board of the Corporate Debtor, Application, the Impugned Order and Appeal, Operational Creditor, the Operational Creditor, Application, Page 348, IRP, the Adjudicating Authority, IBC, IRP, the Learned Counsel, Application, IBC, The Learned Counsel, IRP, PCS, Appeal, The Learned Counsel, Committee of Creditors, CoC, Appeal, IBC, the Adjudicating Authority, the Original Operational Creditor, CoC, Appeal, Appeal, IBC, the Adjudicating Authority decides Application, CoC, NCLT, NCLT, IRP, CoC, SLP, Court, IRP, The National Company Law Tribunal Rules, NCLT, Tribunal, Tribunal, CoC, The Adjudicating Authority, IBC, Adjudicating Authority, IRP, CoC, CoC, IRP, RP, the Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, The Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority, NCLT, IRP, NCLT, IRP, Directors, the NCLT Rules, CoC, NCLT, Court, NCLAT, Reliance, Court, Swiss Ribbons, V. Union of India11, Central Government, NCLT, NCLT, NCLT, CoC, Court, Beacon Trusteeship Ltd.& Ors.12 Reliance, Court, Dinesh Gupta & Anr, IRP, NCLT, IRP, NCLT, NCLT, Regulation 30A15of IBBI Regulations, NCLT, NCLT, NCLT, IRP, NCLT, NCLT, NCLAT, IRP, Shah Bros., Ribbons Private Limited & Anr, v. Union of India & Ors, Dena Bank, Shivakumar Reddy & Anr.14, MSTC Limited v. Adhunik Metalliks Ltd., Indian Overseas Bank, Resolution Professional for Amtek Auto Limited16, Ors.18, CTO Calcutta & Anr.19, Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd., NCLT, CoC, IRP, Court, NCLT, IRP, NCLT, Court, SLP, NCLT, IBC, NCLT, NCLT, IRP, CIRP, IRP, RP, IRP, NCLT, the Adjudicating Authority, Clause 7 of Regulation 30A of IBBI Regulations, Dena Bank, MSTC Limited, Indian Overseas Bank, CIRP, NCLT, IRP, RP, Court, NCLT, Titaghur Paper Mills, NCLT, NCLT, Directors, Court, Swiss Ribbons, CoC, Court, Swiss Ribbons, Committee of Creditors, Committee of Creditors, the Committee of Creditors, NCLT, Tribunal, NCLT Rules, Court, NCLT, NCLT, Court, Swiss Ribbons, Court, Bankruptcy Board of India21, Board, NCLT, NCLT, CoC, CoC, CoC, CoC, CoC, Regulations, IBC, NCLT, Swiss Ribbons, the Supreme Court, CoC, NCLT, NCLAT, CoC, Court, Court, CoC, CIRP, the Committee of Creditors, IBC, Court, NCLT, IBC, the Adjudicating Authority, NCLT, NCLAT, the Committee of Creditors, IBC, Court, NCLT, NCLT, NCLT, NCLAT, NCLT, NCLAT, the Adjudicating Authority, NCLT, Swiss Ribbons, NCLT, Court, CoC, IRP, NCLT, NCLT, IRP, NCLT, IRP, NCLT, NCLT, the Application No.196, IBC, NCLT

DATE: 2021, 13.04.2021, 2021, 2019, 20163, 2019, Two days, 4th March, 2021, 8th March, 2021, 10th March, 2021, 20188, 13.04.2021, 15.04.2021, today, 36A, 33, 31, three days, seven days, three days, three days, 2021, OC, 2016, 25th July, 2019, 2019, 1 March, 2021, 18 March 2021, 2021, 2021, 2019, 2017, 2020, 2019, 1983, two days, the next five days i.e., the 10th day, 2021, 24, 30 days, 2016, 7, 9, 14, 15, 17, 18, 21, 24, 25, 29, 30, 25.07.2019, today, 30 39, OC, 2021, 2023

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, Ahmedabad Bench, Lakhs, Vikram Nankani, Appellant, Salil Thakore, ben, Hitesh Buch, Appellant, Appellant, Schedule, Shyam Divan, Divan, Ashok G. Rajani, Kamal K.Singh, Counsel, Shri Divan, P. Mohanraj v., Dinkar T. Venkatsubramaniam, Manoj K. Daga v., Narayanamma, Govindappa, SCC33015, Moratorium, Swiss Ribbons, Manok K. Daga, Narayanamma, Ram Saran Das, Kamal K. Singh, Ashok G. Rajani, Kamal K. Singh, J.[B. R. GAVAI

CARDINAL: 2, 1, approximately 700, 2, 3, 5, 2 5, 03.03.2021, 6, 7, 8, 3 section 12A, 2021.7, 26.03.2021, 26.03.2021, 4, No.3, 368, 13.04.2021, 69, 19.04.2021, 03.03.2021, three, 11, 201610, 10, 7, 11, 7, 9, 10, 10, 8, 25.07.2019, 1, 9, 2, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 4, 6, 3, 5, 6, 2, 2, 10, 15, 11, As many as 35, 16, 12, 25.01.2019, 11, 4, 12, 25.08.2021, 2021.19, 16, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8), 9, 6, 10, 19, 2, 23, 18, three, 25, 26, 20, 27, 21, 22, 23, 7, 9, 10, 82, 82, 9, 25, 5, 196, 208, 30A, 25.07.2019, 21, 7, 9, 10, 27 constitution, two, 82, 03.08.2021, 18.08.2021, 29, 30, 29, 29, 32, 32, One, 26.03.2021, 82, 31, 33, 34

GPE: Ahmedabad, I.A., CP, IA, intervenors.32, 08.08.2021

EVENT: the Financial Year 2018-2019, view.36, Regulation 30A of IBBI Regulations

WORK_OF_ART: IBC” 4 In short, OC, Regulation 30A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, CoC, IBBI Regulations, Regulation 30A of IBBI Regulations, 30A. Withdrawal of application, State of Orissa20 13, Regulation 30A of IBC, Regulation 30A of IBBI Regulations, Regulation 30A of IBBI Regulations

PRODUCT: Appellant, Application, SC1275 14, others15, Saran Das v., Regulation 30A, Regulation 30A

PERCENT: 90 percent, ninety percent, 90 percent, 90 percent

MONEY: ninety per cent, 90 per cent

ORDINAL: third, third, Secondly, firstly, first, third, third

FAC: OC

NORP: Swiss

QUANTITY: 28 constitution