Ganesh Prasad Vs. Rajeshwar Prasad

Decided On : Mar-14-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 61A of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Section 83, the TP Act, Order VI Rule 17, Plaintiff No.3, the Defendants 7, Section 83, section 83, Article 227 of the Constitution, Section 83, Section 83, the TP Act, Section 83, the TP Act, Article 227, the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment, Order 6 Rule 17, the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, Order 6 Rule 17, Order 6 Rule 17, Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code, Order VII Rule 11, Order 9 Rule 9, Order 2 Rule 2, the Civil Procedure Code, Rule 8, Section 60, the TP Act, Section 60

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, the Original Plaintiffs, the Original Defendant of Suit, the Plaintiffs, the Court of Civil Judge (, Eastern, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Order VI Rule, CPC, Chowk, the Small Cause Suit, the Court of Small Causes, the Small Cause Suit, Defendants, Court, Court, 4500/- Rupees, Defendants, Defendants, Court, Suit No.3, the Small Cause Suit, the Small Cause Suit, the Small Cause Case No.3, Plaintiff, the Small Cause Case No.3, Plaintiffs, the Court of the Civil Judge (J.D., Eastern, Suit, Suit, Suit, 5100/- Rupees, Court, Suit, Para-4, the Plaintiffs, Small Cause Suit, the Plaintiffs, the Plaintiffs Original, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Small Cause Suit, Suit, CPC, First Party, Defendants Second Party, cut.4, Para-4, Defendant No.1's, Rupees, Para-4, Case No.492/87 Rajaram, the Court of Munsif Eastern Ballia, Narayan, Para-5(a, Defendants Second Party, Gate of Tehsil School Ballia, Small Cause Suit, Court, Def, Defendants Second Party, Rupees, 5100/- Rupees, Court, Court, Harihar Prasad, Court, Harihar Prasad, Ka-Date of Mortgage Deed Date, Register No.1 Volume No.1364 Page, No.364, Mortgagor Prasad, Gulab, Laxman Prasad, Mortgagor 4a, ga-Rate, Jethsudi Mortgage Deed Purnawan, Cha-Property, Chowk Paragana, Def, Small Cause Case, Court, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Court, Court, Defendants, Court, Court, the Court/Advocate, City Ballia Chowk, Civil, the Court of the Additional District Judge, District Court, the High Court, The High Court, the District Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Small Causes Court, the Small Causes Court, Plaintiffs, the Civil Court, Order IX Rule, CPC, Suit, the Small Causes Court, Civil, Court, Revajeetu Builders and, Developers v. Narayanaswamy & Sons and Others, the Original Plaintiffs, the High Court, the High Court, the District Court, Order IX Rule, CPC, CPC, Order IX Rule, CPC, Plaintiff, Order VI Rule, Order VI Rule, North Eastern Railway Administration, Court, CPC, CPC, Court, Court, Court, A.K. Gupta, Sons Ltd., Damodar Valley Corporation, Court, A.K. Gupta & Sons Ltd., L.J.Leach, Co. Ltd., LT729, ILR, Cooke, J.W. Ellis and Co. Ltd., Ganesh Trading Co., Court, Life Insurance Corporation of, Sanjeev Builders Private Limited, Order VI Rule, CPC, Gandhi & Ors., the Small Causes Court, the Civil Court, the Small Cause Case No.3, Court, Court, Firm Sriniwas Ram, CPC, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, SCC316 this Court, Appellate Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Usha Balashaheb Swami, Court, Court, time.46, Ganesh Trading Co., Court, Court, Court, State of Madhya Pradesh v. Union of India, Emphasis, CPC, the Small Causes Court, Order IX Rule, CPC, Order IX Rule, CPC, Order IX Rule, CPC, Court, Court, Order IX Rule, CPC, CPC, Legislature, Order IX Rule, CPC, Civil Appeal, Order IX Rule, CPC, the Privy Council, Court, Azamabad Tea Company A.I.R., the High Court, No.11459, ILR, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, No.(5, Court, Involves, the Privy Council, Court, Azamabad Tea Co. Ltd., Order IX Rule, CPC, the Judicial Committee, Order IX Rule, CPC, Suit, the Court of Civil Judge (, Eastern, the Privy Council, Order IX Rule, CPC, Order IX Rule, CPC, ILR, Order IX, CPC, CPC, the Bombay High Court, ILR, the Privy Council, the Bombay High Court, Order XXII Rule, CPC, CPC, the Transfer of Property Act, the Privy Council, Musammat Hansraj Kunwar, Order IX Rule, CPC, Court, Suit, the Court of Civil Judge (, Eastern, Suit, Order IX Rule, CPC, PARDIWALA

PERSON: JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, District Ballia, Shree Gulab Chand, Nos, Defendant, Xxx xxx xxx, Ballia, Xxx, Xxx xxx xxx 4, Defendant Nos, Rajeev Kumar, Munna, Shyam Devi, Gulab Chand, Defendant No.1, Gulab Chand, Def, No.58, No.58, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Registration, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, Def, 3600/- Rupees, Def, Def, Def, Def, Prayer, disputed16, Ballia, Bhan Gupta, Sri Rajesh, Ka, Rajeev M. Roy, different.30, Gorakhpur, Bhagwan Das, Hongonda Patil v., Shidgonda Patil, Gajanan Jaikishan Joshi v., Prabhakar Mohanlal Kalwar, Parameswaran Pillai, Weldon, Neal, Charan Das v., Amir Khan, Jardine Skinner, Cropper v. Smith, Kisandas Rupchand, Rachappa Vithoba, Hongonda Patil v., Shidgonda Patil, Gill, LJCP98:28, Robinson, Unicos Property Corpn., Ganga Bai, Moji Ram, Vijay Gupta, Gagninder Kr, Gulab Chand, Bench, Kumar v., Mahabir Prasad, Siromanamma, Manohar Rele, Krishnabai Narayan Ghosalkar, Kumar, Revajeetu Builders, Bench, Others, Kiran Appaso Swami, Moji Ram, Bench, Kumar, Bhatt, Anr, O. IX r., Mohammad Khalil Khan, Ali Khan A.I.R., Brett, Jay Cook v., Henry S. Gill, LR8CP107as, Fry, Minnie Dietert, Mohammad Khalil Khan, Mahbub Ali Mian, Mohammad Khalil Khan, Sardar Balbir Singh, Atma Ram Srivastava, Mohammad Khalil Khan, Nos, Mohammad Khalil Khan, Others, Mohammed Khalil Khan, Mahbub Ali Mian, Madhavan Nair, Mohammad Khalil Khan, Sadba Powar, Ganu Mahadu Kavade, Ramachandra Kolaji Patil v. Hanmantha, Shankar Baksh v. Dya Shankar and Others, Vithal Rajaram Sutar, Ramchandra Pandu Jadhav, Order

NORP: J.1, Imposed

DATE: 2009, 1346 of 2015, 1908, 26, 27, 28, 1957, 2005, 30 years, 1963, 1963, the year 2005, 15.03.2007, 2007, 2007, 2007, 2006, 2007, 2007, dismissed.11, 2007, 1882, 2009, 2009, date 31/3/09, 2009, 2009, 2009, No.3/Year 2007, today, date 12.05.57, 30 years, 6 years, No.3/year 2007, 20-10- 2010, 2009, age about 35 years 3, age about 33 years, the year 1953, monthly, the year 2005, 31-03-, the year 1953, monthly, Para-8, date 10.09.2008, 700/- + 5100/-, whichever year, monthly, 26, 27, 28, para-10, para-11, plaint".14, Para 12, monthly, 5800 +amount 3600, 12.02.57, Para 9, 12.02.57, 12.02.57, 26, 27, 28, 3 years, the year 2015, the year 2015, the year 2009, 20.5.2013, 5000/-, three weeks, today, 2009, 1325, 2009, 2008, 1990, 2009, 1976, the years 1999, 2002, 2000, 1966, 1887, 1884, 1909, 16, 1873, 1962, 1962, 1974, 1978, 17 36, 2022, 70, 18, 2022, Del 1897)37, 2007, the year 1953, monthly, the year 2005 i.e., the year, the year 1957, (1996, 2014, 2007, 1978, 50, 2011, 49, 2350, 2453, 1965, 8th September, 1967, 1949, 1965, 1941, 1941, 1873, 1904, 58, October 1934, 2009, 1928, 1920, 1887, 1933-34, 61, 2009, 2965, 2009, a period of, six months, today, 2023

GPE: J.D., Block, Pargana, District Ballia, District Ballia, Paragana, District, Joplinganj, City Ballia, Paragana, District Ballia, Para-1, Gulab Chand, Plaintiffs, Harihar, Harihar, Harihar, Para-7, Para-9, Landlord, Para-9, Gulab Chand, Mortgagee, Mortgagee, City Ballia, District Ballia, Paragana, Ballia, possession.24, Pirgonda, P.A., B.K., AIR1967SC96wherein, Pirgonda, Dornan, para22, C.P.C., Mahbub, Suraj, Suraj, District Ballia, Shridhar, Bhaiya, District Ballia, NEW DELHI

LOC: the Additional District, Landlordship, the Additional District, the Appellant herein

CARDINAL: 25.02.2015, 17, 1, 29, 1/3rd, 12.02.1957.5, four, 2, 5, 2 B. Decree, 500/-, 12.02.1957, 20.10.2010, 312, 700/-, 58,00/-, 4, 12-02-57, 12-02-57, 6, Para-6, 4, 2, 12-02-87, 1, 2, 5.2, 5 2, 12-02, 23/-, 2005.6, 4(a, two, 25, 67, one, 01.04.06, 9(b, 9(c, 9(d, 12-02, 700/-, 5800/-, 12-02-57, only 1/3, 700/-, 700/-, mortgagor, 1/3, 12, 309, 311, 13-02, 8, 700/-, Seven hundred, 1/3, one third, one, 29, 1/3, 1/3, 700/-, 1/3, 1/3, 2/3, only 1/3, 9, 1/3, three, 1/3, 5800, 1/3, 03-09-08, 1/3, 700/-, 5100/-, 1/3, twelve, 12, 700/-, 5100/-, 10, One, 29, 1/3, 2/3, 20.05.2013, 25.02.2015, 3,000/-, 11, 20.5.2013, 22.2.2015, 10.4.2015, 25.2.2015, 12, 5000/-, 9, 10, 9, 9, 9, 17, 14, 17, one, 8, 517, 16, 17, two, 1, 14, 9, 9, 15, 17, 4, 19, 110, 26, 891, 51, 33, 644, 11, 8, 1, 2, 399, 2, 93, 4, one, 17, 19, two-fold, 12.02.1957, 700/-, 23, three, 20, two, 2, 11, 21, two, 2, 22, three, 12, 8, 8, 9, 8, 9, 9, 9, 9, 8, 2, 9, 8, 8, 9, 9, 9, two, two, 1942.54, 25, 31, 282, 86, 61, 61, 26, 61, 3 and 4, 3, two, 4, two, 59, 9, 29, 28, two, 75, 1, two, 9, two, 9, two, 9, 52, 9, 44, 226, 9, only two, 9, 9, 30

WORK_OF_ART: the Appellant Defendant, A. By the Court, Para 5(a)-, Shivam Hospital, Late Harihar Prasad, Sandhi, Para 13, the Appellant Defendant, 2 All ER24(CA, Vijay Kumar, the Appellant Defendant, the Appellant Defendant, Firm Sriniwas Ram, The Appellant Defendant, the Appellant Defendant

FAC: City Ballia, the Appellant Defendant, the Appellant Defendant, the Appellant Defendant, Deep Narain

PRODUCT: Para 1, Para 9(a, Para 9(a, Def, Sitaram, Block No.2-5, LJ QB621, LJ Ch, Appellant, IA121, Order IX Rule, a Full Bench

ORDINAL: second, second, fourth, fifth, Second, second, first, second, first, secondly, first, first, First, secondly, 1st, first, Secondly, first, second, first, second, second, second, secondly

MONEY: 1/- Rupees per hundred

EVENT: Block No.2-5 A. No.25, Halliday Road, Halliday Road