National Institute Of Rural Development Vs. Shyam Sunder Prasad Sharma

Decided On : Feb-28-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Rule 6

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, Institute of Rural Development, Sunder Prasad Sharma & Ors, no.1, the Ministry of Rural Development, Government of India, the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme, no.1, the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme, the Executive Council, NIRD Rules, no.1, no.1, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, no.1, Tribunal, Telangana High Court, the Regularisation Rules, the Regularisation Rules, the Regularisation Rules, no.1, no.1, no.1, the Regularisation Rules, Tribunal, the High Court, no.1, the National Institute of Rural Development (Service, no.1, Tribunal, the High Court, GPF, no.1, the Regularisation Scheme, the Regularisation Rules, no.1, no.1, the Regularisation Rules, Union of India, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, Clause no.5, the Regularisation Rules, Committee, the Regularisation Rules, the High Court, Tribunal, the New Pension Scheme of the Government of India, GPF, GPF, Reliance, the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme, the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme, Pension, the General Provident Fund Scheme, the General Provident Fund Scheme, the Contributory Provident Fund Scheme, Registrar, the General Provident Fund Scheme, Pension, Institute, Provident Fund, Institute, Pension, cum-Family Pension Rules of, General Provident Fund Account, General Provident Fund Scheme, GPF, the Regularisation Rules, the Regularisation Rules, Regularisation Rules, no.1, no.1, the Recruitment Rules, The Recruitment Rules, General Executive Council, the Regularisation Rules, no.1, the Bye-laws.15, Tribunal, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, GPF, the Regularisation Rules, the Regularisation Rules, no.1, the Central Administrative Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal

PERSON: Appellant v. Shyam, JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1’s, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, Kishan Kaul, S. Oka

EVENT: this Civil Appeal

CARDINAL: more than 100, about 20, about 4,000, 1, 2, 2014.6, 3, 20, 5, 4, 52, 6, only 6, 20, two, 2, 6, 7, 5, 4, 6, 8, 6, 10, 52, 52, 48, 49.1, 2(2, 50.2, 12, 4, 113, 49.4, 2, 12, 50, 12, 13, 48, 52, 50, 52, 52, 13, 6, 14, 52, 4, 52, 4, 15 52, 16, 17

ORDINAL: third, 4th, 14th, first, 4th, third, 3rd, 4th, first, 4th, second

DATE: 14th August 2002, three years, five years, 22nd July 2002, 14th August 2002, three years, five years, 1st May 2007, 18th February 2009, 2011, May 2012, 10th September 2012, 1st January 2004, the years 2013, August 2012, 14th August 2002, the year 2007, the year 2012, the year 2002, May 2012, the year 2014, 14th August 2002, 22nd July 2002, 14th August 2002, 13th August 2007, 1st May 2007, May 2007, May 2007, 01.01.2004, 9 11, May 2012, the year 2002, Rule 6, 50, 48, 48, 49, three months of the date, three months, 49, 52, 18th February 2009, 52, the year 2002, May 2012, 52, a period of, two months, today, February 28, 2023

WORK_OF_ART: the Regularisation Rules

PRODUCT: no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.1

QUANTITY: 8 crores.8

PERCENT: 8%

GPE: p.a., New Delhi