S. Athilakshmi Vs. The State Rep. By The Drugs Inspector

Decided On : Mar-15-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 18(c, Section 27(b)(ii, Section 482, Section 18 of, Section 18, Section 18(c, Section 27(b)(ii, section 18, Section 18(c, Section 33, Section 38 of the Act, Chapter IV of the Act, Section 18 and Section 27, Chapter IV of the Act, Chapter medical, Chapter IV of the Act, Section 18 and 27, Section 27, Section 482 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Chapter 4 of the Act, Section 18­A, Section 197, Section 2, Section 27(a)(i)(ii, Section 18(c, Section 27

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 1, 2, 4, 20, 1, 4, 5, 4, 6, 7, 4, 8, 1, 10gms, 9, 4, 3 10, 20gms, 11, 15gms, 3, 82/15gms 12, 4, 15gms, 1, 14, 30gms, 2, 1, 16, 20gms, 1, 17, 30gms, 1, 18, 2, 409, 10, 9/03/2016, 10, 10, 3 426, 4 424, 9/03/2016, 1 No.1, 10, 10, 5 428, 1, 10, 4, 22.09.2016, 23.01.2018, 21.06.2022, 5, three, less than one, 6 7, 123, 123, 123, 1.xxxxxxxxxxxx, 8 2, 3, 4, 1, 9, 10, 11, 123, 12, 10, 123, 18, 13, 16.03.2016, 22.09.2016, 23.01.2018, One, 1 2022, 25, 15, 19, 15, 7, 1, 4, 17

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, CRL, No.9978 OF2022 S. ATHILAKSHMI, Respondent(s, Court, the Head of Dermatology Department, the Government Omandurar Medical College, Chennai, Royapettah Medical College, Villivakkam, Chennai, the Drugs Inspector, Villivakkam Range, ml.3, Mycotin Cream 15, Mopry 2%, Momtop­S, ESM Cream, Momesone Cream, Sudif Cream, Kenozole Cream, the Drug Qty, Mycotin Cream 1 No.24/02/2016 Nufoce Power 1 No, Cultivera Location 1 No.11/03/2016, Drugs 4 Control, the Court of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, Appellant, the High Court, Special Leave Petition, Court, the State Government, the Official Gazette, Central Government, Board, Court, Appellant, the High Court, DVL, the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, the Central Government, Parliament, Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, Schedule K, Schedule (K, Schedule (K, Drugs Extent, Conditions of Exemptions, xxxxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 5, label.].4, Head of Department, Dermatology, Government Medical College, Schedule ‘K, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Schedule ‘K, Schedule ‘K, the Show Cause Notice, the Drugs Testing Laboratory, Court, the Investigating Authorities, Court, Divisional Accountant, the Medium Irrigation Project Division, Court, Court, Court, the Madras High Court, Criminal Case No.7135 of, X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Murari

PERSON: Appellant(s, Civil Surgeon, Denidol Lotion 1 No.198.50, Salico Lotion, Tebir Gel 10 gms 9 Nos, CAP Gel, Bill No.& Date Name, Tamil Nadu, Gazette, Drugs Control, Tamil Nadu, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule K, Schedule C, Schedule G, Appellant, Tamil Nadu, Hasmukhlal D. Vohra, Anr, Mohd, Shabir v. State, Chennai

GPE: No.87, Act.5, Ld, M.D., India, P.C., Mansukhlal, Gujarat, Dhulia, New Delhi

DATE: 16.03.2016, 10gms, 10gms, 99/10gms 13, 130/30gms 15, 1940, 1973, less than three years, five years, less than three years, 23.01.2018, 1945, 1940, less than two years, up to 5 years, 3 years, the day, 1945, more than four years, 14, 1973, 1997, 1979, 27, 16, 2018, March 15, 2023

ORDINAL: 30ml, 60ml

FAC: Zylo AC, the Show Cause Notice

PERCENT: 2.5%

PRODUCT: CAP Gel 1 No, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent

NORP: Tablets 2, Rules, Indian

WORK_OF_ART: Drugs and Cosmetics Act 1940

LOC: Single