Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Directorate Of Enforcement Vs. M. Gopal Reddy

Decided On : Feb-24-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Section 4, Section 7 r/w Section 13(2, Section 17(1, Section 438 Cr, Section 45 of the Act, Section 45 of the Act, Section 438 Cr, Section 45 of the Act, Section 438 Cr, Section 45 of the Act, Section 45, Section 45 of the Act, Section 438, Section 50 of the Act, Section 3 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, Section 4, Section 45 of the Act, Section 45 of the Act, Section 4, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Section 45 of the Act, Section 438 Cr, Section 45 of the Act, Section 438 Cr, Section 45, Section 45 of the Act, Section 438 Cr, Section 45 of the Act, Section 438 Cr, Section 45, Section 438, Section 45 of the Act, Section 438 Cr

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, The Directorate of Enforcement, Respondent(s, 02.03.2021, the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad in Criminal Petition No.1148/2021, the High Court, Enforcement Directorate, ED, Government of India, the Directorate of Enforcement, FIR, EOW, FIR, Max Mantena Micro JV, Hyderabad, FIR, the Government of Madhya Pradesh e­ Procurement Portal, MPSEDC, M/s Antares Systems Limited, M/s, Tata Consultancy Services, TCS, MPSEDC, M/s Osmo IT Solutions and M/s Antares Systems Ltd, EOW, PWD, Tender no 49813, MPRDC, M/s Mantena Group of Companies, EOW, the Mantena Group, M/s Max Mantena Micro JV, FIR, Prevention of Corruption, ED, File No.ECIR/HYZO/36/2020, ED, M/s Mantena Constructions Ltd, Anteras Pvt Ltd, ED, Hyderabad, Additional, the Water Resources Department, the State of Madhya Pradesh, ED, M/s Mantena Construction, ED, the High Court, Court, Nikesh Tarachand Shah Vs, the High Court, ED, the High Court, ED, the Directorate of Enforcement (ED, ED, the High Court, ED, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Nikesh Tarachand Shah, Asst, Court, Nikesh Tarachand Shah, Court, the High Court, Court, Shri K.M. Nataraj, ED, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, IPC, ED, Srinivas Raju Mantena, ED, ED, the High Court, ED, ED, Mantena, Srinivas Raju Mantena, Hawala Channels, the High Court, Court, P. Chidambaram Vs, Directorate of Enforcement, CBI, Shri Vijay Agarwal, the High Court, FIR, Court, Court, FIR, IPC, the High Court, Court, Nikesh Tarachand Shah, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, ED, the Public Prosecutor, the Public Prosecutor, the Special Court, Special Court, the Central Government, State Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Nikesh Tarachand Shah, Court, Nikesh Tarachand Shah, Court, Court, Nikesh Tarachand Shah, Court, the High Court, Nikesh Tarachand Shah, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Srinivas Raju Mantena, the High Court, the High Court, IPC, FIR, the High Court, the High Court, non­co­operation, Hyderabad, Further, the Special Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court

PERSON: Appellant(s, Versus M. Gopal Reddy & Anr, JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, Bangalore, Nos, Nos, No.10030, Anr, Shri K. M. Nataraj, Enforcement Directorate, V.C. Mohan, V.C. Mohan, V.C. Mohan, Srinivas Raju Mantena, Mohan Reddy Vs, quash, V.C. Mohan, V.C. Mohan, V.C. Mohan, V.C. Mohan, P. Chidambaram

NORP: J.1, Tender

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1

CARDINAL: 15.12.2020, 1, 10.04.2019, 20, 2.1, 2, 2.2, 2.3, 2, 2.4, 3 420, 471, 2.5, 18, 4, 2.6, 2.7, 11, 5, 2.8, No.1, 3.1, 6, 3.2, 7, 3.3, 3.4, 8, 3.5, 3.6, 3.7, 7, 9, 4.1, No.1, 4.2, money­, 104.3, 4.4, No.1, 11, 4.7, 12, 45, 1, 2, less than one, 2, 13, 2, 1, 2, 14, one, 15, No.1, 6.1, 16, No.1, 6.2, 18, 19

DATE: 2002, 2002, the period of 5 years, 93, 94, 1020, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2018, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, last one year, 2019, 2013, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 1973, the age of sixteen years, 1973, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, 2002, the 1st, the 1st, about 60 years, 17, 2002, 15.12.2020, 2023

ORDINAL: first

GPE: India, Cr, IO, Y.S., Cr

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //