Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramesh Chandra Sharma Vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh

Decided On : Feb-20-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Land Acquisition Act, Section 3, Land Acquisition Act, Section 6(1, Section 17, Section 17, Section 23, Section 6/17, the Agreement Regulation, P-5 S. No.1 - For, the Land Acquisition Act, Article 14, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 23, the Land Acquisition Act,1894, Article 14, the Land Acquisition Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 18, Section 18, section 12, Article 14, Constitution, Constitutional, Article 14, Aphorism 8, Aphorism 39, Article 14 of the Constitution?.31, Constitution, List-II, Section 26 of Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, Constitution, Article 298 of Constitution., Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14, article 14, a Constitution Bench, Section 377, Article 14, Article 14, Section 377 IPC, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Section 377 IPC, Section 377 IPC, Section 377, the Full Bench, Article 14, the Land Acquisition Act, Article 14, Article 19(1, Article 21 of our Constitution, Article 14 of the Convention, Article 14 of our Constitution, Constitution, Article 19(1, Article 14, Article 3(1, the Human Rights Act, Article 13 of the 1998 Act, Article 14, Section 23 of the Act, section 4, section 6, Section 23, Section 23 of the Act, Section 23 of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, the Land Acquisition Act, The Land Acquisition Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, The Land Acquisition Act, Section 23, Section 23, Article 14, the Full Bench

ORG: THE SUPREME Court OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8819, S.L.P (C) No.11447/2018, Chandra Sharma & Ors, Uttar Pradesh & Ors, S.L.P (C) No.21323/2018, Uttar Pradesh & Ors, S.L.P (C) No.2256/2019, Uttar Pradesh & Ors, RESPONDENT(S, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Smt, U.P. & Ors.1, NOIDA, the Board of Directors of NOIDA, the State Government, High Court, the Greater Noida Authority, Court, Smt, the Supreme Court, Nagpur Improvement Trust, Ors.2, the U.P. Land Acquisition, the Division Bench, Smt, Pushtaini, Authority, Liberalization, New Okhla Industrial Development Authority, NOIDA, the Uttar Pradesh Government, Gautam Budh Nagar, the Uttar Pradesh Government, the U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, Greater Noida, Gautam Budh, G. Noida, the High Court, the High Court, Gajraj Vs, The High Court, Abadi, L.Rs & Ors, Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority Vs, Devendra Kumar & Ors.5, Gajraj (Supra, Court, U.P. & Ors.6 3 (2011, Sections 4, Gajraj (Supra, the Respondent-Greater Noida, 26th Board, Greater Noida, the Land Acquisition Rules, Greater Noida, Committee, Committee, the Ancestral Agriculturists, Committee, Committee, Village Ghodi Bachheda, Villages, Order No.4/4/1/2008 -C.X., the Government of Uttar Pradesh Following Committee, Village Ghodi Bachheda, Villages, Order No.4/4/1/2008 C.X., Rural Engineering Service, Agricultural Foreign Trade and Agriculture Export, Greater Noida - Member 3, District Magistrate, Gautam Buddh Nagar - Member, Committee, Committee Meeting, the Committee of Villages, the Greater Noida Authority Board, Authority, Financial Years, District Magistrate, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, Meerut Division, Greater Noida Authority Board, Committee, Meerut Division, Authority, LA / 2008, Order, Greater Noida, Agriculturists, Committee of District Magistrate, Greater Noida, the Financial Years 2006-2007, the Village Ghodi Bachheda, Villages, the Recommendation of the Committee, the Authority Board, Vide Order No.4/4/1/2008 -C.X., the Government of Uttar Pradesh, Committee, the Village Ghodi Bachheda, Committee, Uttar Pradesh Sadan, Committee, Pankaj Agarwal, the Greater Noida Authority, Greater Noida, Committee, Committee, Prem Mukhiya, Ajith Mukhiya, Nemvir, Pradhan, Villages, Committee, Village Ghodi Bachheda, Villages, Committee, Agriculturists, Villages, the Greater Noida Development Authority, GDA, Greater Noida, Ashok Pradhan, Meerut Division, Committee, District Magistrate, Order, Greater Noida, Committee, Village Gonda Bachheda, the Greater Noida Authority, the Additional Collector (L A, Divisional, the Ancestral Agriculturists, Villages, the Greater Noida, Bachada, Villages, Authority, Shani 299.5660 30.10.2006 6, Committee, Divisional, Greater Noida, Parliament Shri Ashok Pradhan, the Ghaziabad Development Authority, Housing Development Board, the Competent Level of Authority, Committee, District Magistrate, Agriculturists, Committee, Committee, District Magistrate, Committee, Greater Noida, Village Ghodi Bachheda, Villages, Uttar Pradesh Land Acquisition, Villages, Committee, District Magistrate, Committee, Authority, Committee, Committee, the Greater Noida Authority Board, Sd/-, Pankaj Agarwal, Rural Engineering Service Agriculture Foreign Trade and Agriculture Export, the Greater Noida Authority, 74th Board, Authority, the Authority Board, Village Ghodi Bachheda, Greater Noida The Agriculturists, the Greater Noida, Authority, Shani 299.5660 30.10.2006 6, Committee of District Magistrate, Greater Noida, Order, Greater Noida, Village Ghodi Bachheda, Villages, Board, Committee, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, Village Ghodi Bachheda, Rural Engineering Service, Agriculture Foreign Trade and Agriculture, Greater Noida, District Magistrate, the Greater Noida, Village Ghodi Bachheda, the Greater Noida Authority Board, Committee, Rupees Five, Villages, Additional District Magistrate (L.A., No.833/Eight- A.D.O., the Additional Collector (L.A., Villages, Committee, Committee, Authority, the State Government, yard & 02.11.2011, the Pushtaini Land Owners as Additional Compensation, Counsel for the Appellants Contended that:- I. Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, Court, the Nagpur Improvement Trust Case (Supra, Pushtaini, the Respondents Contended, Affidavit, Appellants, Court, Pushtaini, Pushtaini, the High Court, Pushtaini Landowners, the Full-Bench, the High Court, Pushtaini, Court, Nagpur Improvement Trust, Learned Senior Counsel, the Greater Noida, Shri Ravindra, the State of U.P./A.A.G., G. Noida, Court, Land Acquisition, Greater Noida, the High Court, Court, the Writ Petition, the High Court, The Respondent Authority, Court, Authority, Pushtaini, Gair-pushtaini Landowners, Court, Court, Pushtaini Landowners, The High Court, the Division Bench, Smt, Union of India, State Governments, Sections 23, Smt, State, the Bengal Special Courts Act, Court, that:- 7 (1952, Old Dearborn Distributing Co., Seagram, L Ed 109, 4th Edn, Southern Railway Co., Greene, L Ed 536, Lake Iron Co., Rustom Cavasjee Cooper (Banks Nationalisation, Central Bank of India, the Union of India, The Banking Companies (Acquisition, Transfer of Undertakings) Ordinance, Court, Court, State, Article, Court, Legislature, Court, Navtej Singh Johar & Ors, Union of India Thr, Ministry of Law, IPC, State, the High Court, Gair-pushtaini Landowners, the High Court, the GNOIDA Authority, Pushtaini, Pushtaini, Greater Noida, Court, Proportionality, Associated Provincial Picture Houses Limited, the King’s Bench Division, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Parliament, Om Kumar & Ors, Union Of India11, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Authority, Court, classification.46, the Indian Court, Om Kumar (Supra, Court, Proportionality, Court, the Indian Courts, The European Court of Justice, the European Court of Human Rights, the Indian Supreme Court, Court, Court, the European Court, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and, Convention, Convention, The European Court, Indian Courts, English Courts, Court, State, Court, State, Court, J.in State, A.P. v. McDowell & Co., SCC709, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Air India, L&S, State, A.P. v. McDowell and Co., the Canadian Supreme Court, Brunswick School Dishut, English Courts, the European Court, the Courts of the validity, the English Court, Parliament, the English Court, Q.C. &, the Indian Courts, the K. S. Puttaswamy & Anr, Union of India & Ors.12, the Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha & Anr, K.S.Puttaswamy(Supra, Court, State, State, Bench, Gujrat Mazdoor Sabha (Supra, the Central Government, Court, Court, the Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha (Supra, Puttaswamy, Mazdoor Sabha, Court, K S Puttaswamy, Union of India, State, State, Authority, Court, the Full-Bench, the High Court, Pushtaini, Court, Nagpur Improvement Trust, Nagpur Improvement Trust, Court, the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, Court, State, Court, Pushtaini, Nagpur Trust, Court, Court, Court, Greater Noida, Court, the High Court, the Writ Petition, the High 54 Court

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, Anoop Singh, APPELLANT(S, Jageshwar Singh @ Jage, APPELLANT(S, Madhuri Srivasatava Vs, Madhuri, Madhuri Srivastava, Vithal Rao, Madhuri Srivastava, Gair Pushtaini, Pushtaini, Pushtaini, Gurgaon, Haryana, Respondent- G. Noida, Radheyshyam, Savitri Devi Vs, square metre, Jaibir Singh, Coordinator Examined, Background-, Agriculturists, Agriculturists, Vide Order, Meerut, square metre, Meerut, Order, Memos, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Agriculturists, Shri Shravan, Kumar Sharma, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Agriculturists, Yogendra Singh Rawal, Subedar Ramchandra, Mahi Singh Bhati, Lokesh Bhati, Maha Singh Bhati, Pratap Singh Bhati, Pratap Singh Sarpanch, Singh, Ajit Singh Nagar, Kamal Bhati, Ram Bharti, Bhule Singh, Braham Singh, Atmender, Maharaj Singh, Mehndi Hassan, Vikram Singh, Satbir Pradhan, Naresh Upadhyay, Rampal Havaldar, Memos, Memos, Lok Sabha, Sri Nawab, Meerut, Agriculturists, Meerut, Agriculturists, Village Gonda, Surajpur, Ajaybpur 37308 01.06.2006, Gondi Basera, Dadha, Agriculturists, Meerut, Order, Singh Nagar, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Agriculturists, square metre, Agriculturists, Shravan Kumar Sharma, Gautam Buddha Nagar Sd/-, Jaiveer Singh, Uttar Pradesh16, Agriculturists, Surajpur, Ajaybpur 37308 01.06.2006, Gondi Basera, Dadha, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Sri Thakur, Gautam Buddha Nagar -Member Coordinator, Rs.310 square metre, No.527/8 -VK BHL, Agriculturists, Pushtaini Gair-pushtaini Compensation Landowners Landowners, pushtaini, yard yard, Pushtaini, Gair-pushtaini, Appellants, Vithal Rao, Shri, Ravindra Kumar, Pushtaini, Francis Bacon, Coquillette, Francis Bacon, Appellants, Madhuri Srivastava, quam privata, Govind Ki, Pushtaini, Gair-pushtaini, Madhuri Srivastava, Pushtaini, Anwar Ali, Lal Chowdhury v. Union, Skinner, Dalmia, Krishna Dalmia, S.R. Tendolkar, Pushtaini, them.40, Wednesbury Corporation10, Wednesbury, Wednesbury, Greene, Wednesbury, GNOIDA, GNOIDA, Pushtaini, Gair-pushtaini, Wednesbury, Handyside, Articles 2, SCR759 Mahajan, Patanjali Sastri, Madras, V.G. Row, Cri LJ966, Jeevan Reddy, Cunliffe, Oakes, Dickson, Ross, David Pannick QC, Bench, Chandrachud J, Vithal Rao, Gair-pushtaini

CARDINAL: 1, 1.1, 02.03.2009, 10.05.2016, 07.07.2017, 6, No.2, 2, 1, 4, 9, 28.01.1991, 38000, 124, 03.10.2005, 580.1734, 4, 5, 12, 7, 6, 6, 28.10.1997, two, 322, 714, 8, 1, 1, 1, 2, 8, 1, 28.10.1997, 3, 31.12.2007, 9, 7.03.2008/, 10.03.2008, 29.04.2008, 1055/, 06.06.08, 175, 11.08.2008, 1, 15.09.2008, 1, 2, 1, 102, 22.09.2008, 11.10.2008, 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19, 23, 5.01.2007, 2006- 2007.3, 10.06.2008, 175- 200, 5.01.2006, 580.1730, 2, 3, 4, 580.1730, 111.8868, 31.12.2007, 5.01.2007, 13, 31.07.2008, 21.07.2008, 21.07.2008, 14, Rs.175-200, 8, 8, 265, 2, 3, 4, 580.1730, 10.06.2008, 16, 1, 2, 3, 25.10.2008, fifty two, twenty one, 1434.3207, Five, Twenty seven, fifty six, 21.10.2008, 1392.9586, four, twenty one, eighty, 280, 2, 301.27, 259.27, 21.10.2011, 957.36, 461.16, 496.20, 19, two, 20, two, 21, 22, three, 22, 1, 23, 1, 2, 2, 244, 248, 26, 246, 27, two, 28, 81, 299, one, 86, 316, 540, 54, 216, 412, 30, one, 62, 247, only 14, two, 1, 8, 1, two, 9, 10, one, 3439.While, four, 10, 1 KB22336, 2, 11, 2, three, 38, 27.The, 29.The, 1, 5, 677, 6, AIR1951SC118:1950, 6, 1, 3, 4, 599, 372, 3, 58, 827,839, 799, 821, 200, three, 1, 521, 42, 3.16, 4.13.12).48, five, nine, 12, 10, 10, four, 44, seven, 45, two, 46, 23, 1, 1, 47, test.57, 1, 49, two, one, 50, one, 51, 61, One, only 52

GPE: MURARI, Smt, Urdu, India, Delhi, Delhi, India, Memos, Memos, New Delhi, Singh Rawal, Garba, Tronica City, Village, Memos, Memos, Tronica City, District Magistrate, Memos, Village, India, Oklahoma, US, Wakefield, L Ed, India, India, UK, India, Prussia, Germany, France, Luxembourg, Strasbourg, UK, pp, India, India, India, India, Chintamanrao v. State of M.P., India, Australia, Canada, Strasbourg, U.S.A., India, Herne Hill, Wednesbury, India, MURARI, NEW DELHI

NORP: J.1, Persian, Indian, Indian, Hon'ble, Agriculturist, Agriculturist, Agriculturists, Agriculturist, Agriculturists, Hon'ble, Agriculturist, Agriculturists, Agriculturist, Arab, Pushtaini, Gairpushtaini, Indian, Indian, American, Indian, Indian, European, R., Gujarat

DATE: 30.03.2018, 2009, 07.01.1998, 2016, 1894, 1997, 30.03.2018, 1973, the early 1970s, 1976, under 5, 2011, 2011, 2015, 28.01.1991, 15.07.2006, 1997, 25.10.2008, each financial year, 1994, the year of 1997-98, each financial year, 5.05.2008/ 1069, 9.05.2008, 1113, 1115, 10.05.2008, 21.07.2008, 4, 8, 11, 13, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 11 26, 27, the year of 2006- 2007, 10 days, the last week, February 2007, the financial year, 1894, 14.05.2006, 28.06.2006, Years 2006-2007, 01.04.2006, 215.6010 27.10.2006 7, 122.2699 27.10.2006 8, 31.01.2007, the last week of February, the month of February 2007, the financial year 2006 2007, 29.09.2001, 1997, the financial year 2006-2007, 03.11.2008, Meeting/ 2008, 2006 2007, the financial year 2006, 215.6010 27.10.2006 7, 122.2699 27.10.2006 8, 111.8868 31.01.2007, the financial year 2006, 2007, 21.07.2008, 11.08.2008, 25.10.2008, 2006-2007, 1.04.2006, the financial year 2006-2007, 23.06.2008, 15.01.2009, July-Sept. 2006, only three years later, 1973, six weeks, six weeks, six months, 24 26, 2529, the 17th century, 1956, 1894, 1894, 1950, 1936, 1139, 1655, 1942, 1942, 1910, 1910, Sunday, 1154, 1918, 31 35, 1969, 1970, 1959, 2018, existence37, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1947, 2001, the nineteenth century, 1950, 1950, 39, Articles 8 to 11, 1976, 1992, 1950, 1950, Articles 19(2, 1950, Articles 19(2, 1952, 1996, the last fifty years, thousands.32, 1981, 1996, 4133, 1994, 810, 1986, 1996, 1997, 45, 1998, 1999, August, 2000, the years, 2017, 2020, covid-19, 4856, 1973, 1936, 5365, 20TH FEBRUARY, 2023 55

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, Judgment, 6 SCC OnLine, No.1, Sections 17(1, Rs.2,500/- square meter, The Full Bench, the Full Bench, Villagers, Villagers, Villagers, Villagers, Assurance, Para No.4, Villagers, Villagers, No.1, Articles 245, statute36, SCC45943

WORK_OF_ART: Pushtaini, Pushtaini, The Villagers of the above Villages, the Conference Room of the Greater Noida Authority, GNOIDA, EHR737

PERCENT: 15%, 10%, 64.70%, 10%, 95.54%, 15%

ORDINAL: first, 26th, 72nd, first, 74th, 74th, 74th, 74th, 72nd, first, first, first, Seventh, Seventh, first, first, secondly, first, first, first, 4th, First, Secondly, first, Thirdly, fifth, first, third, fourth, first, secondly, thirdly, fifth, third, fourth, fifth

FAC: Background, 26th Meeting, Constitutional

MONEY: 1894 Act, 26 DLR

QUANTITY: 12 metre, 35 WEDNESBURY

TIME: 03.11.2008., Minutes, 3.11.2008., Minutes, Rs.175- 200, 24 of the Act

EVENT: the Financial Year, the Financial Year, List-II, the Wednesbury Principle

LOC: L Ed

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //