Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Neeraj Dutta Vs. State(govt.of N.c.t.of Delhi)
Decided On : Mar-17-2023
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 7, Section 13(2, Section 12, Section 13, Section 7, Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d, Section 13(2, Prevention of Corruption Act, the Constitution Bench, the PC Act, the Constitution Bench, section 2, Section 7, Constitution, Constitution, Section 7 of the Act, Section 13(1)(d)(i, Section 7 or Section 13(1)(d, Section 7 of the Act, Section 13(1)(d, Section 7 of the Act, Section 20, Section 20, Section 13(1)(d, Section 20 of the Act, Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d, Section 13(2, Section 20, the Constitution Bench, Section 20, Section 7, the Constitution Bench, Section 20, Section 20 of the Act, Section 7, Section 20 of the Act, Section 20, Section 20, Section 7, Section 20, Section 7, Section 7, Section 20, Section 7, Section 13(2, Section 20 of the Act, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7, Section 20, Section 13(2, the PC Act, Section 13, Section 13(1)(d, Section 13(1)(d, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, Section 13(2, the PC Act, the Constitution Bench, The Constitution Bench, The Constitution Bench, Section 7, Section 313, Section 7, Section 13(1)(d
DATE: 2009, 1988, 2009, three years, two years, 6th May 1996, 17th April 2000, 6th May 1996, a few months, 2009, 17th April 2000, 1 2014, 2015, 2001, 2009, 1988, 15th December 20224, 26th July 2018, 2009, less than three years, seven years, 2009, 2009, 74, 2009, 2009, 2009, 76, 2009 of 2018, 5 2021, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2014, 2014, 1988, 26th July 2018, 2009, 26th July 2018, 2009, 2009, 2009, 17th April 2000, 2009 16, 2009, 1973, 17th April 2000, that day, 2009, 17th April, 2009 2000, 6th May 1996, a few months, 25th April 2000, 8 days, 24th April 2000, 17th April 2000, 2009 19, March 17, 2023
ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, The 1 Criminal Appeal No.1669, Rs.5,000/. Sentences, the High Court, PW7, Vikas Puri, the Anti Corruption Bureau, the 2 Criminal Appeal No.1669, The Special Court, Special Court, the High Court, Court, State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.2, Sections 7 and 13(2, Sections 7 and, Additional Solicitor General, LEGAL POSITION8 Before, Sections 7, Sections 7, the Central Government, State Government or, Parliament, State, Government, Sections 7 and, Court, Criminal Appeal No.1669, Court, Criminal Appeal No.1669, B. Jayaraj1, B. Jayaraj1, B. Jayaraj1, Court, Court, Court, Court, CBI, CBI, A.P., Court, Sections 7, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Sections 7 and, Court, Criminal Appeal No.1669, Court, Irrigation Department, Traffic Inspector, PW7, ACP, GC, GC, Yogesh Kumar, Criminal Appeal No.1669, Neeraj Dutta, M/s. Sagar Motors, M/s. Sagar Motors, PW7, the Anti Corruption Bureau, the Special Court, PW7, the Special Court
GPE: N.C.T., Delhi, Delhi, New Delhi, Rs.10,000/., Andhra, PW5, C.M., PW5, PW5, PW5, PW5, PW5, PW5, Cr, P.C., PW5, PW5, PW5, PW5, PW5, New Delhi
PERSON: JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1, Yogesh Kumar, Ravijit Singh, S. K. Awasthi, B. Jayaraj v. State, P. Satyanarayana Murthy v. District, M. Narsinga Rao v. State, SUBMISSIONS6 Shri S. Nagamuthu, Aishwarya Bhati, P. Satyanarayana, N. Vijayakumar v. State, Tamil Nadu5, P. Satyanarayana, B. Jayaraj, S.K. Awasthi, S.K. Awasthi, O.D. Yadav, Niranjan Singh, Neeraj Dutta, meter, S. Oka
CARDINAL: 2, two, three, 13, 10, 1, 74, 13, 13, 7, 6, 7, 13.Criminal, 1, 8, 74, 13(1)(d)(i, 9, 10, 11, 76, 11, 12, two, three, three, 9, 9, 9, 3, two, two, three, 26, 26, 3, 2, 13 SCC55, 5, 543, 13(1)(d)(i, 15, 1, 16, 17, only one, 18, 19, 20, three, four, five, 21, one, 22, 19, 23, 24
TIME: 7:30 a.m., 8:00 a.m., between 3:00 and 4:00 p.m., 3:50 p.m., about 4:40 p.m., 2009 5:30/6:00 p.m., 5:20 p.m., the morning of 17th April 2000, around 5:20 p.m., about 3:50 p.m., 5:30/6:00 p.m., about 5:20 p.m.
PRODUCT: the Act 16 of 2018
WORK_OF_ART: Legal remuneration" The
ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, second
EVENT: this Constitution Bench
NORP: N.
FAC: Jai Vihar