Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

K.c. Cinema (corret Name K.c. Theatre) Vs. The State Of Jammu And Kashmir

Decided On : Jan-03-2023

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Article 21 of the Constitution.6, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution.18, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution 19, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 19(6).20, the Cinematograph Act 1952, Article 19(1)(g, Article 226:2, Article 226, Article 32, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Rule 87, Rule 87, Rule 87, Rule 87(i) & (ii, Rule 87

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL, Kashmir & Ors ....Respondent(s, the High Court of Jammu, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, Multiplex/Cinema Hall, The High Court, the State Government, The High Court, c. Infants, The High Court, the High Court, the State Government, Civil Appeal No.78, the High Court, B. Cases, Olley v. Marlborough Court Ltd, Shoe Lane Parking Ltd, Parker, the High Court, a Public Interest Litigation, the High Court’s, the High Court, Respondents No.3, Cinema Halls, Court, Court, Respondents 3, Court, the High Court’s, Respondents 3 and, Parker, Court, the High Court, Court, The High Court, the State Government, Court, Mafatlal Industries Ltd., the High Court, T.N. Legislative Assembly, the High Courts, Court, the High Court, The High Court, restaurant.25, The High Court, Theatre, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Brojo Nath Ganguly, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Central Inland Water Transport Corpn, the High Court, the High Court, D. Parting, State, the High Court, The High Court, The Government of J&K, Licensing Authority, State, State, the Jammu & Kashmir Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, the High Court, the Bombay High Court, CJI

DATE: No 77 of 2023, No 78 of 2023, No 79 of 2023, No 29 of 2019, 78, 2023 1, 18 July 2018, 2023, 1877, 1949, 1964, 1970, 10l, 1983, 1989, 1989, 2016, 1997, 1986, 2021, 2022, 1986, 18 July 2018, 1939, 2019, 2019 40, 2023, 2019, 2019, January 03, 2023 20

PERSON: Appellant(s, Versus State, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, A. Background 2, Niranjan Reddy, Sumeer Sodhi, Bimal Roy Jad, a. Parker, KB523 c. McCutcheon, David Macbrayne Ltd, Thornton, Olley, McCutcheon, Olley, McCutcheon, Thornton, Jeevan Reddy, J.who, Alagaapuram R. Mohanraj v., it.22, Brojo Nath Ganguly5, Abhishek Khanna, Jacob Punnen, TC, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.[Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha

GPE: Jammu, Jammu, Jammu, Thornton, Jammu, New Delhi

CARDINAL: 3 B. Cases, 11, 19, 79, two, 3, 6, 6, 1, 4 d. Viewers, 5 c., No.3, 4, 6, 9, 2, 1, 2.10, 7, One, 813, 9, four, one, one, four, 6, 3, 4, 10, 4, 11, nine, 6, 5, 108, 13, 3, 4, 14, 15, one, 89, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, one, 17, 18, 36, 87, 1975.38, 29

NORP: D., d.

LOC: Kashmir, Kashmir, Jammu

TIME: about three long hours

EVENT: The 1975 Rules, The 1975 Rules, The 1975 Rules, the 1975 Rules, the 1975 Rules, the 1975 Rules, the 1975 Rules

ORDINAL: first, second, second

WORK_OF_ART: The Transferred Cases

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //