Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai Vs. Property Owners Association

Decided On : Nov-07-2022

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the MMC Act.4, The MMC Act, The MMC Act, the MMC Act, the Maharashtra Act No, the Maharashtra Act No, Section 61, The MMC Act, Section 154(1A, the MMC Act, section 83, Chapter XVIA, Chapter XVI­A, Chapter XII­, section 61, section 126E, Chapter XII­A, section 122A, Chapter XII­A, section 126B, section 61, Chapter XIV, section 195E, Chapter XII­A. 14, section 140A, section 139A, section 179, section 217, section 167, section 140A, section 154, section 169, section 170, section 154, section 154, section 154, the MMC Act, the MMC Act, Constitution, the BMC Act, Section 140, section 140, the BMC Act, Section 140, section 195E, section 195E, section 61, section 61, Section 140, the BMC Act, Chapter IXA, Article 243­X of the Constitution of India, Article 243­X of the Constitution, Section 4, the MMC Act, the BMC Act, Article 243­ZF, Article 243­W., section 4, the BMC Act, Article 243­X, section 154, the BMC Act, Article 243­X., Chapter VIII, section 140A, section 154, Article 243­X, section 162, Article 243­X, Constitution, Article 243­X, Section 154, the MMC Act, Section 128, The BMC Act, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, the BMC Act, the BMC Act, Section 154, the MMC Act, Section 154, the MMC Act, the MMC Act, Rule 21, Rule 21, the BMC Act, Section 154, the BMC Act, Rule 21, section 154, the BMC Act, section 154, section 154, section 154, the BMC Act, section 154, section 154, the BMC Act, the BMC Act, the BMC Act, section 154, the MMC Act, the MMC Act, Section 155, the MMC Act, Section 140A, the MMC Act, Section 140A(2

CARDINAL: 1, 29.7.2019, six, 1, 3, 10, 5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 1B, 8, 18.10.2010, 30.11.2010, 120., 123, 9 125, 1, 123A, 2, 10, 2, three, 11, 128, 1, 2, 2, 134,196, 460I, 3, 1, 2, 12, 139, 1, 2, 3, 139A., 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 13, less than eight, more than fifty, less than 0.1, more than 1, more than five, more than 0.2, 2, 140A., 1, 140, 128, two, three, less than half, two, three, 15, 1C, 154, 40, 46.45, 46.45, 1, 2, 4, 16, 5, 2A, 1, 2, 3, 163, 217, 2, 17, 154, 1, ten, 1A, 2, 4, more than 4, 1B, 1B, 1A, 1C, 1A, 3, 2010 Amendment, 1A, 1A, 4, more than 4, 1B, 19, 1D, 1A, 1A, 1C, 1C, 2, 2, 20, 2010.155, 1, 1A, 2, 3, 1A, 1B, 1B, 22, 3, 21.4, 2, 1, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 23, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 24, 4, 1, 2, 1.2, 2, 1, 1, 10, 14,15, 16, 2, one, 2, 10, 2, 3, 16, 1, 2, 11, 1, 25, 1, 2, 3, 1, 21, 2, 27, 3, 1, 2, 0.30, 1, 1.25, 2, 1.25, more than 1, 28, 1, more than 1, 1, 2, 1A, 1B, 1C, 1B, 1.Short, 2, 2.Definitions, 1A, 3, 30, 21.4, 2, 1, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, deleted11, 1, 1, 10, 14,15, 16, 2, one, 2, 10, 2, 32, 3, 16, 17, 1, 21, 2, 3, 19, 19, more than 1, 1, more than 1, 1, 34, 2, 13, 12, 13, 12, 1.00, 36400, X250, 13, 1.00, 1.001.00, 33200, about 29.01.2014, 36, 24.02.2014, 5, 22, 86, 155, 49, 38, 158, 1, four, four, four, 169, 170, 39, four, four, 1, 160, 1, 12, 1, four, 1, 162, 40, 26, 173, 41, 181, 1B, 227, 1, 1A, 42, 1A, 185, 1, four, 43, 189, five, 5­Star, 205, 44, three, 20, 1A, 1B, 1A, 1B, 2010.17, 211, 2, 3, three, 1, 1, 1A, three, 1, three, 1B, 1A, 1A, 20, 216, 20, more than 1.0, 1.0, more than 1.0, 20, 218, 20, 1A, 20, 20, 1B, 1A, 48, 20, 1A, 20, 1A, 1B, 20, 2015.19, 229, 20, 22, 3, 17, 21, 20, 1A, 610, 50, 22, 2, three, 5, more than 150, one, 52, 2, 27.01.2010, 6, 9, 4, 79 to 94, 254, 53, 10, 5, 22, 6, approximately 2.75, 27.5, 19, 2, 51 to 58, 19

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, SLP, GREATER MUMBAI & ORS, SLP, SLP, SLP, SLP, SLP, No.17009, the Division Bench, the High Court of Judicature, Contempt Petition (Civil, Court, Court, The Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, the State Government, Municipal Acts, The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, University of Mumbai, Corporation, The Statement of Objects, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, the Municipal Corporation of Brihan Mumbai, High Courts, the Supreme Court, Rent Control Legislation, the State of Maharashtra, the Rent Control Acts, the Municipal Corporation of Brihan Mumbai, the Rent Control Act, the Bombay Rent Restriction Act, the Bombay Rents, Hotel Rates, Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, the Bombay Rents, Hotel, Lodging House Rates Control Act, the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, the Rent Control Act, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, Court, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, Corporation, the 6 Corporation, the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Corporation, Capital Value Based System of Assessment, the Annual Rental System, Rental Value, Capital Value, the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Annual Rental Value to, Capital Value, Corporation, Determination of True Market Value of Property) Rules, carpet area, Corporation, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, the Capital Value, the Standing Committee, Capital Value Rules, the Capital Value Rules, Capital Value Rules, the Capital Values Rules of, the Capital Value System, Committee, the Standing Committee, the Capital Value Rules, the Capital Value Rules, the Fines Fund, Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, the Water and Sewage Fund, the Consolidated Water Supply and, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, Committee, the Board of Trustees, Bombay Improvement Trust Transfer Act, the Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply, Transport Undertaking, Chapters IX, the Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply, Transport Undertaking, the Board of Trustees, Bombay Improvement Trust Transfer Act, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the Corporation of the powers, Board of Trustees, Corporation, the State Government, Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply, Corporation, the Standing Committee’s, Corporation, the Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, Education, the Bombay Municipal Corporation, Corporation, Brihan Mumbai, Corporation, Corporation, the Maharashtra Municipal Corporations and Municipal Councils, Corporation, Corporation, the Capital Value, Determination of True Market Value of Property) Rules, the Standing Committee, Maharashtra Act No, Determination of True Market Value of Property) Rules, COVID­19, the Standing Committee, the Capital Value Rules, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, the Standing Committee, Capital Value Rules, III, III, RCC, RCC, Corporation, the Corporation + the built­up area, sub­rule(1, RCC, RCC, RCC, Corporation, Rate, FSI, FSI x AL, NTB, AF, FF, RCC, CA, FF, Capital Value Rules, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, the Standing Committee, Capital Value Rules, III, RCC, RCC, Carpet Area, sub­rule(1, RCC, RCC, Corporation, Rate, FSI, FSI x AL, NTB, AF, FF, RCC, CA, FF, Capital Value Rules, F.S.I., User Category Open Land (Resi, Building Age of Building, F.S.I., BV X UC X FSI X LA, Building Age of Building, F.S.I., BV X UC X FSI, Capital Value Rules, Capital Value Rules, the Capital Value System, High Court, the High Court, the Municipal Corporation, Writ Petition No.2492, the Property Owners’ Association, the High Court, the Capital Value Rules, Court, the State Legislature, the Central Legislature, the Standing Committee, The Municipal Corporation, Education Cess, Corporation, BMC, Betterment Charges, Authority, the Improvement Committee, Committee, BMC, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Legislature, the Standing Committee, Corporation, Capital Value System, Corporation, the Standing Committee, Corporation, the Standing Committee, the Standing Committee, Corporation, Corporation, the Standing Committee and Improvement Committee, the High Court, the Maharashtra Education Cess Act, the High Court, the Capital Value Rules, the Capital Value Rules, the Capital Value Rules, the High Court, The Capital Value Rules, the High Court, the Capital Value Rules, FSI, FSI, FSI, FSI, FSI, the Capital Value Rules, the High Court, The High Court, Capital Value Rules, FSI, TDR, FSI, FSI, TDR, FSI, TDR, Corporation, FSI, TDR, Polychem Limited, the Capital Value Rules, the High Court, The Capital Value Rules, Capital Value Rules, PIL46OF2014, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, the Capital Value Rules, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, the Mumbai Municipal Corporation, the Municipal Corporation, Corporation, the High Court, Court, Special Leave Petition (Civil, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Special Leave, Corporation, Corporation, the High Court, the Capital Value Rules, Corporation, Compilation of Corporation, Corporation, Respondents 2 to 4, State Legislature, Corporation, the State of Maharashtra, Shri D.N. Chaudhri, Maharashtra Law Commission, Respondents 2, Compilation of Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, MCGM, Respondents 2, the State Legislature, Corporation, Compilation of Corporation, Compilation of Corporation, MCGM, Respondents 2, Corporation

DATE: 2019, 2019, 2019, 2019, 2019, 2019, 21.10.2019, 2019, 18881, annual, annual, 2009, 2009, 1888, annual, annual, annual, 1944, 1944, 1947, 1947, 1999, 2000, the 31st day of March 2000, over 65 years, annual, the year 1940, 1999, the last more than 65, 1995, 1888, 2010, 2010, 20.03.2012, 2015, 20.01.2010, 2010, 20.03.2012, 2015, annually, each fifth day of, February, 1925 13, 123C, year, 460LL, 1925, 1933, the financial year 1974­75, the twentieth day of March, 460H, the year, the official years 2010­2011, 2011­ 2012, 2012­2013, three years, the 1st of April, three years, three years, 1973, five years, the year, the year, annual, preceding year, the year, five years, the year, the year, five years, the 1st April 2015, the 31st March 2015, the financial year 2019­20, August 2010, 2010, the preceding year, the year, the first day of April 2009, the thirty­first day of March 2010, each of the years 2010­2011, 2011­2012, each such year, each such year, three months, the subsequent years, the 1st April 2010, the year 2009­2010, the years, every five years, the year, annual, year, annual, 1995, 1958, every five years, 2009, 1995, 1958, five years, the year 2020­21 and the year 2021­22, the year 2021­22, the year 2019­20, the year 2022­23, the year 2020­21 and the year 2021­22, the year 2025­26, the official years 2010­2011, 2011­2012, 2012­2013, the 1st April 2010, 21, the year, 2010, 20.03.2012, 1888, namely:­ 1, 2010, 2616, 29 11, 2015, 1888, 2015, 1st April 2015, 31, 16."deleted"3., 1st April 2010, April 2015, April 2010.20, 2010, 2010, 2015, 24.02.2014, 2014, 21, 2010, 2015, 37, 1)(a, 1)(a, 1962, the years 2010­11, 2011­12, 2012­13, the respective years, three years, an earlier date, 2010, 2010, 2015, 2010, 4516, 2010, 1st April, 2010, Rule 21, 47 18, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 21, 2010, 2015, 21, 21, 22, 49, 2013, 1888, 21, the years 2010, 2015, 1888, 21 days, today, 51 20, 2019, 29.7.2019, 2010, 2015, 2009, 2009, January 2010, Para 13, 08.10.2010, 29.12.2010, Para 14, Para 39, Para 31, 2010, the year 2010­ 11, 48, 49, 2010, Para 32, 54 9

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, CJI1 Leave, Contempt Petition, Municipal, Bill, Formula, Ready Reckoner, Bill, Municipal Commissioner, D.M. Sukthankar, D.N. Choudhary, Roshan Namavati, xxx xxx xxx, xxx xxx xxx, xxx xxx xxx, ­a, meter, meter, 2012­2013, Ready Reckoner, value2, Ready Reckoner, Ready Reckoner, Ready Reckoner, xxx xxx xxx, Weightage, loft, air­ conditioning, loft, sub­rule, sub­rule, sub­rule, sub­rule, sub­rule, sub­rule, sub­rule, sub­rule, gurudwara, Ready Reckoner, Ready Reckoner, Ready Reckoner, Ready Reckoner, Ready Reckoner, Weightage, loft, air­ conditioning, loft, sub­rule, sub­rule, sub­rule, gurudwara, Ready Reckoner, Ready Reckoner, Ready Reckoner, pre­amended, List­II, Schedule, Betterment Charge, Part­IX­A.182, Ready Reckoner, K.K. Venugopal, V. Sreedharan, Shri D.M. Sukthankar, Roshan Namavati, counter affidavit

WORK_OF_ART: 24.4.2019, Municipal Acts or, Stamp Duty Ready Reckoner, Stamp Duty Ready Reckoner, the "Important Guidelines of Stamp Duty Valuation, the "Important Guidelines of Stamp Duty Valuation, Nature, Nature and Type, the Constitution of India, L.A. Bill No.LXXIV

GPE: Bombay, Mumbai, India, States, Mumbai, India, Mumbai, India, Mumbai City, the City of, Bombay, the City of, Bombay, the City of, the City of Bombay Municipal (Amendment, Brihan Mumbai, Brihan Mumbai, Brihan Mumbai, Brihan Mumbai, sub­rule(1),or, UC, UC, UC, UC, Notwithstanding, Brihan Mumbai, deleted13, UC, UC, UC, UC, Notwithstanding, Betterment, India, Stamp, re­, India, p.a., bills.10, Mar

TIME: 22.11.2019

LOC: Octroi, Chapter III, deleted19, Greater Mumbai

ORDINAL: first, first, 26th, first, first, first, Seventh, firstly, first, first, second

FAC: the Bombay Stamp, the Bombay Stamp, the Bombay Stamp Act, the Bombay Stamp, the Bombay Stamp Act

EVENT: Official Year, Parts II, Parts II, MMC Act

PRODUCT: 460KK, X100, X100 X100 X80C.V., Rule 21

QUANTITY: 500 sq. feet, 500 sq. feet, 35 CV

MONEY: forty per cent, 154A. Provisional

PERCENT: 75%, 40%, 10%, 70%, 50%, 70%, 50%, 25%, 25%, 50%, 20%, 70%, 50%, 70%, 50%, 50%, 6.25%

NORP: Rs.40, Rules, Petitions, re­

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //