M/s Texco Marketing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Tata Aig Generla Insurance Company Ltd

Decided On : Nov-09-2022

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 11, The Indian Contract Act, section 17, the Indian Contract Act, the Contract Act, Section 10 of the Contract Act, Sections 17, the Contract Act, Section 19, the Contract Act, Section 19, the Contract Act, Section 19, the Contract Act, section 13, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 3 of the, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 14 of the, Section 2, Section 47, Section 49, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 14, Section 14 of the, Section 2(1)(r, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 21(A, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Contract Act, Section 14(d, the Consumer Protection Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, SLP, Appellant Versus TATA, AIG General Insurance Company Ltd. & Ors, Standard Fire & Special Perils, Disputes Redressal Commission, the State Commission, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the National Commission’, the State Commission, the National Commission, the National Commission, the State Commission, Smt, the National Commission, the State Commission, Black’s Law Dictionary, Standard-Form Contracts, Court, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., B.V. Nagaraju v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Court, Court, Court, B.V. Nagaraju, the Insurance Company, Skandia Insurance Co. Ltd., Court, Court, Margetson & Co., AC, the House of Lords, Armement Maritime S.A. v., N.V. Rotterdamsche Kolen Centrale, Notice, Finney Lock Seeds Ltd., Court, United Insurance, MacGillivray, Court, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Modern Insulators Ltd., Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Bharat Watch Company v. National Insurance Co. Ltd., Court, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., insured.8, SCDRC, Court, NCDRC, Court, the District Forum, District Forum, SCDRC, SCDRC, Court, NCDRC, the District Forum, NCDRC, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Protection of Policy Holder’s Interests, Regulation 2002, IRDA Regulation, Blue Pencil, Court, Court, American Courts, Court, Beed District Central Coop, Bank Ltd., State of, 4th Edn, Advanced Law Lexicon, 3rd Edn, Inc., Basler, Phrase, Court, Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd., Jain Studios Ltd., context:-, the District Forum, District Forum, the Consumer Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Court, Court, which--, the State Commission, the National Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the National Commission, Sections 47, State Commission, Central Government, District Commission, State, State, the State Commission, the State Commission, Jurisdiction of National Commission, National Commission, Central Government, State Commission, the Central Authority, National, the National Commission, the National Commission, the State Commission, the National Commission, the State Commission, the National Commission, the State Commission, the National Commission, the State Commission, the National Commission, Court, Commission, IREO Grace Realtech, the National Commission, The National Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the National Commission, the National Commission, Clauses, the IRDA Regulation, un, the National Commission, the State Commission, the National Commission, the IRDA Regulation

DATE: 2019, 2022, SCC25 13.On, 1996, 1996, 1987, 1893, 1967, 1966, 1983, 2022, 31, 1766, 35, 1996, 2000, 2019, 2004, nearly ten years, 16.10.2002, 2002, thirty days, 2006, 2005, 1999, 1920, 1920, 1996, 2006, 1872, 16, 1872, 1986, 1986, 2005, 2019, 46, 46, 2019, 49, 49, 35, 36, 37, 38, 58, 35, 36, 37, 38, 1986, 2021, 1986, 1986, 1908, 1872, 1986, 2002, 2016, 2002, November 09, 2022 30

PERSON: JUDGMENT M. M. SUNDRESH, A.K. Ganguli, Shantha Devi R., N. Murugesan v. Union of India, Bench, Skandia, Kokilaben Chandravadan, Carter, Good Faith, George Mitchell, Law Reports Q.B., Nanda, Law, Ed, Mansfield, Carter, Boehm, xxx xxx, George Mitchell, Harchand Rai Chandan Lal, Vol, P. Ramanatha Aiyar's, Vol, Attwood v. Lamont, Merriam Webster, q.v., Attwood v. Lamont, xxx xxx, xxx xxx xxx, namely:--, namely:--, jurisdiction--, Abhishek Khanna, J.(SURYA KANT, J.(M.M. SUNDRESH

CARDINAL: 28.07.2012, 28.07.2012, 27.07.2013, 1, No.1, 2, 3, 8, one, one, one, 10.The, 4, 12.An, 5, 2, 2022, 4, 19, 4, two, six, 6, nine, 4, 650-51, 7, 6, 6, two, three, 2, 665-66, 14, two, 251, 357, one, one, 1 AC361, 815.An, three, 9, 4, 33, 3, 10, 6, 11, 6, 19.A, 2, 8), 6, 12, 8, 13, 22.In, 14, 8, 10, 9, 297, 430, 430, 1, 553-54, 12, 230, 552, 556, 3, 15, 3, 6, 2, one, 1, 2, one, 3, 4, 5, 18.“Misrepresentation, 1, 2, 3, 17, 2(i, 18, two, 18, 19, 2, 1, 1, 14, one, 28.The, one, 26, 21, 2, one, 22, 47, 23, 31.Though, two, 49, 47, 1, one, ten, ten, 1, 39, 24, 2, 1, 1, ten, ten, 59, 1, 39, 2, 1, 47, 58, 2533.Under, 2, 59, 34.In, 35.We, 3, 33, one, one, No.1, 38.Under, 14(f, 28, 39.Non, 3, 4, 3, 4

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, THE BAR5 Shri, ……, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1

ORDINAL: third, first, second, second

NORP: Rs.7.5, English, American

WORK_OF_ART: Adhesion Contract, Breach of Contract

GPE: Shivram, Glynn, Halsbury, L.C., E.R., Halsbury, pp, E.P.I., Cleveland, India, F.A., New Delhi

LANGUAGE: English

QUANTITY: 3. Act

LOC: the District Forum.—(1, Builder

MONEY: 2019 Act