Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M.p. Power Management Company Limited Vs. M/s Sky Power Southeast Solar India Private Ltd.

Decided On : Nov-16-2022

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 2.1 of the PPA, Article 2.1 Seller, Article 2.5.1 of the PPA, Regulation 32, Section 162 of the Act, Article 2.5.1(d, Article 226, Article 12, Article 2.6 of the PPA, Article 14, Constitution, Article, Article, Article 12, Article 9.1 of the PPA, Article 9.1, Article 226, Article 14, Article 9.1 of the PPA, Article 298 of the Constitution, Article 299, Article 298, Article 12 of the Constitution of India, Article 162 of the Constitution, Article 73 and Article 162 of the Constitution of India, Article 298, Article 12 of the Constitution, Article 162 of the Constitution, Article 298, article 298, Article 226, the Contract Act, the Contract Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Sections 43 and 43(A, the Electricity Supply Act, Sections 43, the Electricity Supply Act, Section 43-A(2, Section 6A, Section 6A.22, Section 63, Section 63, the Electricity Act, Section 62, Article 1, the "Guidelines for Tariff Based Competitive Bidding Process for Grid Connected Power Projects Based on Renewable Energy Sources, Section - 63, the Electricity Act, Section 63, the Electricity Act, Section 62, Section 62, Section 63, Section 63, Section 62, Section 63, Section 63, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Article 12 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution and, Article 226 of the Constitution, SCC73743 28, Constitution, Respondent 1, Article 14, Article 14, the Rule of Law, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Companies Act, Article 226 or, Article 32 of the Constitution., Article 12 of the Constitution, Article 298 of the Constitution in entering or, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 12, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution in entering or, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 298 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 32 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Article 226, the Contract Act, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the constitution of, Article 12, Article 226, the Companies Act, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14, Section 42, the Income Tax Act, Section 23 (2015, Section 42, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, SLP, M.P. POWER MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED, M/S. SKY POWER SOUTHEAST SOLAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & OTHERS, the Judgment of the High Court, Review Petition No.682 of, the High Court, the Writ Petition, the Power Purchase Agreement 1, the Government of Madhya Pradesh, the Special Leave Petition, the State of Madhya Pradesh, MW, M/s Sky Power Southeast Asia Holding Limited, MW, M/s Sky Power Southeast Solar India Private Limited, MW, M/s Sky Power Solar India Private Limited and M/s Sky Power Southeast Asia, MW, inter alia, inter alia, Effective, MPPMCL, Consents, MPPMCL, EPC, Sky Power, Construction Financing, Mis L&T Finance, Power Management Company Limited Bittan Market, Power Management Company, Conditions, SkyPower, Sky Power Letter SKP2/MP/SOLAR MPPMCL/2015-, MPPMCL, Skypower Dear Sir, MIS SKYPOWER SOUTHEAST SOLAR INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Sd/- Shivani Jhariya (Authorized Signatory, the Chief Electrical Inspector General, CEIG, the Central Electricity Authority, CEIG, the High Court, Judgment, Court, Renew Clean Energy Private Limited vs, M.P. Power Management Company Limited, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, M.P. Power Management Company Limited, Renew Clean Energy Private Limited, the Power Purchase Agreement, the Supreme Court, Renew Clean Energy Private Limited, Writ Petition No.420 of, the High Court, Additional Solicitor General, Madhya Pradesh State Load Despatch Centre).10, Additional Solicitor General, Court, Kerala State Electricity Board, the High Court, State, State, State, Force Majeure, the High Court, the High Court, CEIG, CEIG, MW, CEIG, the High Court, State, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Renew Energy, Renew Energy, Court, State of Bihar, State, Court, Court, ABL International Ltd., Export Credit Guarantee Corpn, India Ltd.3, State, State, Renewable Energy, Court, Renew Energy, Court, CEIG, the High Court, CEIG, Court, Judgment of this Court, City and, Industrial Development Corporated of, Maharashtra Ltd., the High Court, State, Additional Solicitor General, the High Court, Court, Renew Energy, Renew Energy, Court, the High Court, Renew Energy, State, the High Court, Renew Energy, State, Board, Court, the High Court, the Executive Power of the Union, State, inter alia, State, State, Government Company, Government Company, State, State, State, State, State, Parliament, State, State, State, the State Legislature, Parliament, Union Government, the State Governments, State, State, State, Parliament, the Statutory Contract, Additional Solicitor General, the Judgment of this Court, The appellant- Board, The High Court, the Writ Petition, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, India Thermal Power Ltd., State of M.P. and others5, the State of Madhya Pradesh, State, Electricity Board, State, the Central Government, The Electricity Board, MoU, the High Court, Court, the Electricity Board, GBL, Emphasis, India Thermal Power Ltd., Section 6A, U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, Authority, Court, NBCC, India Thermal Power Ltd., Commission, Guidelines, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Commission, Commission, the Central Government, the Central Government, India Thermal Power Limited, State, State, Radhakrishna Agarwal, the State Government, Court, Erusian Equipment and, Chemicals Limited, Court, Government, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Court, Court, Additional Solicitor General, Radhakrishna Agarwal, International Airport Authority of India11, Court, L&S, L&S, State, State, State, Eastern Book Co., State, Bareilly Development Authority, the appellant- Authority, the U.P. Planning and Development Act, Court, State, Radhakrishna Agarwal, Delhi Development Authority, DFO, Biswanath Tea Company Ltd., Mahabir Auto Stores, Indian Oil Corporation, Court, State, State, Reliance, Court, IOC, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, L&S, L&S, R.D. Shetty v., Dwarkadas Marfatia, Sons v. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, State, State, State, State, State, State, Emphasis, Court, State of U.P14, U.P., State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, Emphasis, Court, State of U.P, Court, Court, Court, the Sale of Goods Act, Government, the High Court, the High Court, A.P., the High Court, Court, Court, Court, this Court of the type, Radhakrishna Agarwal, Court, Government, Court, Dwarkadas Marfatia & Sons v. Board of Trustees, Mahabir Auto Stores, U.P., L&S, Emphasis, Binny Ltd., Court, The High Court, Government, Emphasis, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, ABL, State, Court, Court, State, State, Court, Registrar of Trade Marks, the High Court, Court, State, Court, Emphasis, Court, Court, State, U.P. v. Bridge & Roof Co., Court, Court, Noble Resources Ltd., State of Orissa20, ABL, Court, State, ABL, Court, Court, ABL International Ltd., L&S, Jalgaon Municipal Council, the High Court, U.P., L&S, State, State, Black's Law Dictionary, Corpus Juris Secundum, Joshi Technologies International Inc. v. Union of India, Additional Solicitor General, the Government of India, inter alia, inter alia, ABL, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, State, State, Court, the High Court, State, State, the High Court, State, Court, the High Court, State, State, State, Court, ABL, ABL International, State, Court, the High Court, Commission, Emphasis, State, U.P., Court, ABL, Joshi Technology, State, State, Court, Court, Court, State, State, Court, State, Court, State, Court, Bareilly Development Authority, Radhakrishna Agarwal, ABL, State, R.D. Shetty, Tata Cellular, Union of India26, State, State, State, State, Court, State

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, Order, Order, PPA.4, Seller, Sd/- D.G.M., MPMCL, Sky Poer Letter, Sd/- D.G.M., Kaurav, Mohinder Singh Gill, K.M. Natraj, A.M. Singhvi, Naman Nagrath, Shri V. Giri, Shri K.M. Natraj, Kurien E. Kalathil, Seller, A.M. Singhvi, Singhvi, Renew Energy, SCC45718, lorry receipts, Singhvi, Singhvi, Shri V. Giri, Shri K.M. Natraj, Reasons, Kurien E. Kalathil, Cooper, others6, Articles, Satramdas Lalvani, N.M.Shah, Custodian-cum-Managing Officer, Har Shankar and, Ors.10, SCC78110, Ramana Dayaram Shetty, Frankfurter, Viteralli, Saton, Law Ed, Bhagatram, Mathew, J., Frankfurter, Frankfurter, 4th Edn, Dicey, Hayek, Harry Jones, Mathew, J., Upendra Baxi, Ed, SCC11647, Bhai Parmar, SCR66231, Radha Krishna Agarwal, E.P. Royappa v. State, Tamil Nadu, SCC, Maneka Gandhi, Ajay Hasia v., Khalid Mujib Sehravardi, Salve, Dr Jekyll, Mr Hyde, Verigamto Naveen v. Govt, the Order of the Full Bench, AIR1995A.P.1, SCC752, Shrilekha Vidyarthi, V. Sadasivan, Others17, SCC65759, G. Bassi, Whirlpool Corpn, SCC23663, Binny Ltd., V. Sadasivan, G.B. Mahajan, Desai, Para 11, Mahadev Appa Roa, Wednesbury, others23, M.K. Jose24, Sudhir, Kumar Singh, Others25, Abbaskhan v. State of, A.M. Singhvi, Jekyll, Hyde, Kumar Singh

NORP: J.1, DISCOMS, Statute, SCR619, others13, Kumari, Indian, Kumari, Mandamus, Statute, SCC43374

CARDINAL: 27.02.2020, 28.12.2020, 300, three, 50, one, 50, 2, two, two, 50, 15.04.2016, 18.09.2015, 3, 12.01.2017, 34.12, 4, 2.1.1.(b, 5 6, 2, 16/06, 29, 6, 20.06.2018, 2, 20.04.2016, 18.08.2017, 8, 1, 9, 15.04.2021, 10, two, 13, two, 9, 50MW, 10, 5, 61, 258, 14, four, 15, 182, 17, 18.09.2015, 2, 3, 350, One, 3, 3, 20, two, two, 22, 350, 23, 24, 25, 26, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 07.07.2018, 27, 20.06.2018, 6, 8), 9, 28, 10, one, 298, 30, 31, 10, 33, 5, 3, 11, between 35, 20, 36, 5.5, 6, 1, 38, 39, 3, 1, 9, 4, 1, 10, 1, an executive 11, 3, 359, 3, 27, 3, 1, 462, 101, 3, 45, 540-41, 28, 46, 2, 22, 3, 3, 2, 2, 3, 3, 12, 3, 3, 462, 49, 4, 165, 1, 1, 258, 3, 50, 51, two, 22, 53, 54, 36, 55, 6, 16, 8, 21, 3, three, 3, 3, 742, 58, 30, 17, 6, 4, 27, 28, 28, 62, 6, 10, 15, 29, 29, 3, 64, 6, 881, 3, 41, 65, 1, 742, 19, 7, 7, 1, 23, 67, 68, 7, 69, 1, 69.2, 69.3, 69.4, 70, 1., 70.2, 70.3, 70.4, 71, 70.5, 70.7, 70.8, 7270.9, 70.10, 70.11, 73, 13, 20, 20, 24, 9, 3, 23, 847 75, 7, 76, 78, 26, 6

DATE: 2019, 2020, 18.09.2015, 210 days, nine months, 210 days, an additional nine months, 210 days, 22.02.2017, only 12 months, 10.03.2017, 10.03.2017, 10 March 2017, 12 Jan 2017 3, September 18, 2015, 10 March 2017, 12 Jan 2017, nearly five months, the next date, 2010, 20.08.2017, 11.08.2017, 15.01.2017, 2017, 54 days, 2 I0days, 210 days, 210 days, 16 days, 1978, 11.08.2017, 18th September, 2015, 07.07.2018, 2019, 27.02.2020, September, 2020, 9 months, 56 days, 12 12 months, 12 months, a period of, two years, 18.09.2015, 19.04.2018, 21.04.2018, 25 years, 25 years, 1611, 16 days, 56 days, 24 months, 24 months, 1977, 2004, 210 days, 24 months, 25 years, the year 2015, 24 months, 19.04.2018, a few days, September, 2017, 11.08.2017, September 2017, 19.04.2018, 24 months, 53 days, 16 days, one 29, 1956, 2000, 2000, 1948, 1976, 2022, 24, 2003, December, 2012, 2003, 1977, 1975, 1972, 1975, at least 5 years', 1979, 1012, 1975, 1975, 1975, 1975, 1975, 1975, Today, 1978, 1973, 1989, 1977, 1977, 1980, 1980, 1981, 1981, nearly eighteen years, 13 (1990, 1977, 1977, 1974, 1978, 1981, 1979, 1989, 14 (1991, 33, 36, 15 (1996, 1977, 1989, 1990, 1991, 2005, 38, 18 (2003, 1998, 42, 19 (1996, 2006, 2004, 2005, 1991, February 2004, 1991, 2007, 2010, Arbitrary, 1961, SCC72869 42, 70, 2015, 2004, 52, a year, 25 2020 SCC Online, 1974, 2 SCC121at, 77, 1994

WORK_OF_ART: Judgment in the Writ Petition, SKY POWER, SKY POWER GLOBAL March 14, 2017, MPPMCL, Sky Power, 6 SCC29311, Radhakrishna Agrawal, 63 (Determination of tariff, Administrative Law, The Law of the Constitution, Road to Serfdom, Constitution of Liberty, The Rule of Law and the Welfare State, The Welfare State, Rule of Law and Natural Justice, Democracy, Equality and Freedom, Bridge and Roof Company, K. Prasad, a Writ Petition, a Writ Petition

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, Firstly, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second, first, fifth, firstly, first, first, first, first, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, firstly, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, Firstly, Secondly, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, fifth, fifth, first, first, first, first, Secondly, first, first, first, first, first, Second, Firstly, first, first

PRODUCT: FACTS3, Judgment, matrix.18, Bench, Articles, SCC67866

GPE: MP.1, Jabalpur, India, others2, Kerala, others4, Bihar, Ors.7, Lekhraj, Bombay, India, A.S., Sukhdev, England, Lucknow, Shrilekha Vidyarthi, India, others16, India, India, State, Kerala, Shrilekha Vidyarthi, law.2, Kerala, M.K. Jose, Nawabkhan, Gujarat, Sudhir

QUANTITY: 85 Acres, 87.S Acres, 1 SCC212:1991. SCC

FAC: Mr Raval, others12, Radha Krishna Agarwal, International Airport Authority of India, controlled.40, Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi

MONEY: SCC29332

LOC: East Coast Railway

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //