The Deputy Commissioner Of Gift Tax Vs. M/s Bpl Limited

Decided On : Oct-13-2022

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Gift Tax Act, Section 43, the G.T. Act, Section 64, the G.T. Act, the G.T. Act, Section 6, Section 6, the G.T. Act, the G.T. Act, the G.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, Rule 11, the W.T. Act, Rule 11, the W.T. Act, Rule 11, the W.T. Act, Rule 11, the W.T. Act, Rule 11, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, Rule 11, Section 6, the G.T. Act, the G.T. Act, the W.T. Act, Rule 21, the W.T. Act, Rule 21, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, Section 3, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, Rule 21, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the G.T. Act, the W.T. Act, Rule 21, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the W.T. Act, the G.T. Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, J.The, M/s., M/s., M/s. BPL Limited, M/s. Celestial Finance Limited, M/s., Civil Appeal No.3265, the Central Government, the Reserve Bank of India, Court, S.N. Wadiyar (Dead, Legal Representative v. Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Civil Appeal No.3265, business.6, the Securities and Exchange Board of India, Civil Appeal No.3265, Suffice, Court, Wealth Tax, Court, Court, Wealth Tax, the House of Lords in Commissioners of Inland, the House of Lords, the Articles of Association, the Articles of Association, the House of Lords, Lynall, the High Court of Australia, Wealth-Tax, Wealth Tax, Income Tax, W.T., Civil Appeal No.3265, W.T., Civil Appeal No.3265

NORP: CENTRAL CIRCLE-II

CARDINAL: 29,46,500, 1, 18, 1, 1, 2, 34, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 18, 1, 2, 11, 5, 15, 6, 3, 18, 9, 1, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4, 9, 11, 5, 18, 2, 9, 11, 9, 6, 185, 9, 7, 18, 11, 11, 1, 2, 2, 8, 18, 9, 18, 1, 21, 10, 18, three, 7, 11, 18, 4, 12, 13, 18, 13, five, four, four, 11, 12, 93, 14, 18, five, two, 13, 14, 15, 18, 21, 16, 18, 21, one, 2(9, 17, 18, 9, 11, 18, 18

DATE: 2nd March 1993, 17th November 1990, 10th July 1991, November 1993, 25th May 19941, 19582, 1)(a, 19576, 2015, 1994, 18, shares.11, 1969, 1972, 18, 1972, 1944, 1974, 12th April 2019, 2012, Mad 2562, 2008, 2022

ORDINAL: 16th, fifth, fifth

PERSON: xx xx xx 4 6, Schedule III, Schedule, Meerut, xx xx Xx 11, xx xx xx, Schedule III, Schedule, Ahmed G.H. Ariff, Bench, Schedule III, Purshottam N. Amarsay, Ahmed G.H. Ariff, Ahmed G.H. Ariff, Purshottam N. Amarsay, R. Rathinasabapathy Chettiar, Abraham, Chennai, Shri Thirupathy, Kumar Khemka13, Chennai v. Sadhana, Schedule III, Ahmed G.H. Ariff, Purshottam N. Amarsay, Schedule III, Schedule III, Schedule III, J.(SANJIV KHANNA, J.(J.K. MAHESHWARI

FAC: Schedule II

WORK_OF_ART: Schedule II, Schedule II, W.T. Act, Schedule II

GPE: Karnataka, Crossman, Crossman, Crossman, Abrahams, NEW DELHI

MONEY: eighty per cent, 2 SCC471 Civil Appeal No.3265

PRODUCT: Notes, Rule 9 of Part C of Schedule III of, Rule 9 of Part C of Schedule III of