Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission.

Decided On : Oct-18-2022

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 2(17, the Electricity Act, Section 125 of the 2003 Act, Section 125 of the 2003 Act, Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Electricity Act, Section 37, The Supply Act, the Commissions Act, the Supply Act, the Commissions Act, the Electricity Act, Section 61, Section 12 of 2003 Act, Section 3 of the 2003 Act, Section 3, Section 14 of the 2003 Act, Section 15 of the Act, Section 43 of the 2003 Act, Section 61 of the 2003 Act, the Electricity (Supply) Act, The Electricity Act, section 62, Section 62, Section 61, Section 86, Section 176 thereof.25, Section 125 of the 2003 Act, Section 125, section 100, Section 125, Section 100, Section 100, a Constitution Bench, Section 64, Section 82 of the 2003 Act, Section 84 of the Act, Section 82, Section 86, Section 62, Section 26 62, Section 181 of the 2003 Act, Section 61, Section 61, Section 62, Section 111 of the 2003 Act, Section 125, Section 64, Section 82, Section 86, the Constitution Bench, Section 62, Section 111 of the 2003 Act, Section 61, der Section 62, Section 61, Section 62, Section 64(6, Section 64, Section 64, Section 47(4, Section 126 of the, Section 126 of the, Section 126, the Supply Code Regulations, Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 126 Bill

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, RAJDHANI POWER LTD, RESPONDENT(S, YAMUNA POWER LTD, RESPONDENT(S, BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., C.A. No.4324 of 2015, BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., C.A. 1 No.4323 of, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Appeal, The Tariff Appeals, APTEL, the Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission, Aggregate Revenue Requirement, DERC, C.A. Nos.8660­61 of, Discom, Appellants, Central, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, Appellants, the Central Generating Stations, the State Generating Companies, State, Appellants, ARR, DERC, DERC, DERC, Appellants, APTEL, Aggregate Technical, AT&C, Impugned Order, Fundamental Rules, FR/SR, Consumer Security Deposit, Delhi Power Corporation Limited, DPCL, Impugned Order, Fringe Benefit Tax, Impugned Order, AT&C Loss, BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., BSES Yamuna Power Ltd., C.A. No.4324 of 2015, The Tariff Appeals, Appellants, Tariff Orders, DERC, Determination of ARR, Tariff for FY201112, Civil Appeals, DERC, inter alia, APTEL’s Impugned Order, DERC, APTEL, DERC, the State Government, the State Electricity Boards, Supply, Transmission and Use of Energy, State, Central, Central Electricity Board, CEB, CEB, the Electricity (Supply) Act, the Central Electricity Authority, the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, a Central 7 Electricity Regulatory Commission, CERC, State Electricity Regulatory Commission, SERC, Central and State, the National Capital Territory, the Delhi Electricity Reforms Act, Delhi Vidyut Board, Distribution Undertakings and Business, Distribution and Retail Supply License, DERC, the Delhi Transco Ltd., DTL, Parliament, CEA, Electricity Regulatory Commissions, Appellate Tribunal, Appellants, DERC, the State Electricity Regulatory Commission, DERC, Civil Appeals, National Electricity Policy, the National Electricity Policy, the State Governments and the Authority, National electricity Policy, The Central Government, the State Governments, Authority, the National Electricity Policy, 4)The Authority, the National Electricity Policy, Authority, the National Electricity Plan, the National Electricity, Discoms, Tariff regulations.­ The Appropriate Commission, the Central Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the National Electricity Policy, the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, The Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Commission, the Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Government, Authority, the State Commission, ARR, Appellants, DERC, the State Commissions, DERC, the Central Government, DERC, Court, APTEL, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Court, CPC, CPC, APTEL, Court, CPC, Black’s Law Dictionary, Court, AIR p., Court, the Privy Council, the Federal Court, law.33, APTEL, APTEL, AT&C, FR/SR Structure.4, Consumer Security Deposit, Fringe Benefit Tax.6, AT&C Losses, APTEL, DERC, DERC, DERC, DERC, DERC, Discoms, ARR, Sections 3, 61(b, DERC, Sections 3, 61(b, DERC, Sections 3, 61(b, GONCTD, DVB, the Employees’ Unions, Sections 3, 61(b, Sections 3, 61(b, DERC, Sections 3, 61(b, Tariff, State Electricity Regulatory Commission, State Commission, DERC, the State Commission, State, Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, DERC, Determination of Wheeling Tariff, DERC, the Control Period, DERC, ARR, Control Period, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, ARR, DERC, re­think de novo, DERC, DERC, ARR, DERC, Discoms, DERC, DERC, the MYT Regulations, DERC, ARR, F.Y. 2007­08, Tariff Order, F.Y. 2008­09, F.Y. 2009­10, Court, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v., Tarini Infrastructure Limited & Others2, the State Electricity Regulatory Commissions, a High Court, the State Commission, State, Sections 62, DERC, Court, PTC India Limited v., Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, CERC, Commission, DERC, MYT Regulations, inter alia, DERC, ARR, DERC, ARR, DERC, ARR, Discoms, the Appel­ late Authority, DERC, APTEL, ARR, APTEL, ELR, APTEL, Commission, the Tariff Petition of the, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, APTEL, APTEL, DERC, rethink de novo, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Court, DERC, DERC, MYT, DERC, DVB, Collection Efficiency, AT&C, Commission, the Daily Collection Sheet, DVB, Statutory Auditors, the Statutory Auditors, the Daily Collection Sheet, UI, the Day­wise Collection Statement, RCM/08­09/245, GoNCTD, LPSC, BRPL, AT&C, AT&C, 64.5 Government Bodies, DPCL Total Other Collections, AT&C Loss, DERC, Collection Efficiency, DERC, MYT, F.Y. 2008­09, DERC, DERC, ARR, DERC, MYT Regulations, DERC, DERC, Central Pay Commission Report, the Control Period, the Control Period:, the Control Period, HRA, DERC, MYT Tariff Order, Central Pay Commission Report, FR&SR, BRPL, BRPL, Commission, Commission, The 42 Commission, Commission, 6th Pay Commission, 6th Pay Commission, Commission, 6th Pay Commission, Commission, DERC, Tariff Order, FR/SR, DERC, FR&SR, DERC, Central Pay Commission Report, DERC, the MYT Order, Commission, Commission, Commission, Wheeling and Retail Supply, DERC, DERC, DERC, DERC, re­think de novo, DERC, APTEL, MYT, Tariff Order(s, Consumers Security Deposit, Delhi Power Company Limited, DERC, Consumers Security Deposit, APTEL, DERC, Consumers Security Deposit, DPCL, the Holding Company, the Government of NCT, Discoms, Consumers Security Deposit, DERC, DPCL, DPCL, W.P., DPCL, ARR, Discoms, DPCL, DERC, Consumers Security Deposit, DPCL, ARR, DPCL, Consumers Security Deposit, DPCL, Consumers Security Deposit, DPCL, DERC, Consumers Security Deposit, DPCL, DERC, APTEL, APTEL, Emphasis, The Vigilance/Enforcement Department, DERC, DERC, DERC, Appellant, Rupee, DERC, ABR, the Assessment of Energy, DERC, DERC, DERC, APTEL, Commission, DERC, DERC, DERC, DERC, APTEL, J.(KRISHNA MURARI

DATE: 4324, 4323, FY2011 12, 2015, 2003, 35, 14, 34, 14, 2015, 1908, process.11, 1910, 1910, 10.09.1948, 1948, 1948, 1948, 02.07.1998, 1998, 1998, 1998, 2000, 2000, the year 2003, 1948, 1998, 2003, 1018, annual, five years, one month, 1948, 1998, one year, one year, any financial year, 2003, seven days, sixty days, 5 of 1908, 1318, 1 1962, 2134, 2, the financial year, 2236, 62, 64, 62, 64, 62, 64, 62, 64, 24 62, 64, 62, 64, 2, 2538, 2003, 2007, 2007, 2744, the financial year, the years, 26.08.2011, 2016, 2010, 2007, the year end, 2007, 193 33, the end of the year, the beginning of the year, 35 year, 3, 2, 5, daily, the year, daily, 16th February, 2009, the first year, FY0708 27.51%58, the year, 2007, 28.05.2009, 23.02.2008, last 12 months, The year, year, Annual, each year, 23.02.2008, January 1, 2006, 3 months, each year, 167.5184.0, 4 5, 123.0146.1 2, the base year, 26.08.2011, 26.08.2011, 4464, 23.02.2008, the end of each year, 23.04.2007, twelve 50 months, 5177, 5380, October 18, 2022

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, APPELLANT(S, JUDGMENT S. ABDUL NAZEER, Appellants, Schedule, Chunilal V. Mehta, Ltd.1, Arvind P. Dattar, Dhruv Mehta, Nikhil Nayyar, Findings, Findings, Transfer Scheme, Findings, Chairperson, Arvind Datar, Dhruv Mehta, Nikhil Nayyar, Nayyar, Chairperson, Licensee, Order, Nos, Rs.2810.3 Crs, Rs.2810.3 Crs, BYPL, Particulars Amount Add, Tariff Order, Transfer, Rs Cr, Revised Employee, Lok Adalats, Rs 1,000/­., Formula, J.(S. ABDUL NAZEER

NORP: J.1, D., re­, re­, LPSC, LPSC, LPSC, inad­

CARDINAL: two, 28.11.2014, 62, 26.08.2012, 23, 15, 23, 29, 4, 2015.7, six, 59, 6, 08.03.2001, 815, three, 9, One, 1, 2, 3, 11, 1, 43, 1, 12, 2, 3, 61, 13, 62, 64, 62, 1, two, 2, 14, 3, 4, 5, 6, 64, 1, 15, 2, 3, one hundred and twenty days, 1, 4, 5, two, 16, 6, 100, 125, 17, 18, 6, 3, 20, 35, six, 3, 5, one, six, 86(3, 86(3, 23, 86(3, 86(3, 86(3, 86(3, One, four, 3, 64, 3, 6, 28, one, 29, 23.02.2008, 64, 50, 3, one, 32, DERC5, 17, 5, 60, 34, 6, 31.03.2010, 1, 2, 5, 3, 3.10, 363.11, 3.12.The, 3.13, 37, 3.14, 3.24, 6, 6, 60.4, 48.4, 47.8, 2889.99, 39, No.3, 137.60, 40, 4.100, 41, 4.108, 4.109, 4.112, 4.113, 72, 46.41, 46.45, 45.5051.68, Non­DVB, 1.898.60, 137.60, 23.02.2008, 5.00, 20:80, 45, 1, 2, 3, 5, 23.02.2008, four, No.4, DPCL.69, DPCL.70, 47, 48, 49, 1, 5, 6, 5, 75, 100, 100, 100, 5, 1,000, 100×[Rs 5×2, 200, 800/­, 80, 100, 100, 200, 20, 52, 100, 100, 54

GPE: New Delhi, Impugned, Impugned, C.A., India, India, energy.12, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, States, Discoms, Discoms, SLDC, NDPL, Issue, Employee, issues.68, Delhi, Lok Adalat, issue.81, New Delhi

PERCENT: 90% to 95%, sixty days.27, 4 SCC60331, 104.89%, 30.89%, 23.2%, 11.1%, 11.3%, 11.5%, 9%, 6%, 6%, 6%, 26%, 10%, 10%, approximately 60%, 7 to 8%

TIME: 26.08.2012, 25.04.1998 as an Act

WORK_OF_ART: SEB, The Century Spg. & Mfg, Findings on Issue No.5, 4.99 The Petitioner, Commission’s Analysis 4.242 The Commission

ORDINAL: 10th, second, Secondly, Sixth, 6th, 6th, Sixth, first

PRODUCT: GERC4, Col­, allowed.60, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

EVENT: 4 2015 SCC Online APTEL50[Para, the Sixth, Table 67

FAC: the Control Period, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat

LOC: the Control Period, the Control Period, the Control Period

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //