U.n. Krishnamurthy (since Deceased) Thr. L.r.s Vs. A.m. Krishnamurthy

Decided On : Jul-12-2022

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Appeal Suit No.262, Section 16(c, Section 16 of the Specific Relief Act, Section 16, Section 16, Section 16(c, Section 16(c, Section 16(c, Section 16(c, Section 16(c, Section 16(c, Section 96, Section 100, Order 41 Rule 31, the Limitation Act, a Constitution Bench, Section 20 of the Act, section 16(c, Section 16(c

CARDINAL: 1, 3, one, 4, 1, 5, three, 21, 18, 20, 7, 821, 1.10.2018, 16, 9, 10, 40, 10, 1, 15, 9, 1, 10, 3 55, 372, 5, 5, 31, 5, 6, two, 3, 13, 4, 2, 4, 3, 4 SCC756, 15, 2, 619, 10, 4, 18, 13, 117, about 30/40, 37, 14, 12, one, ten thousand, ninety thousand, 19.41, 3, 10, 17, 12, 10, two, 1, 528, 1, 2, 3, 42, 28, 19, 60,000, 9, 20, 3, 31.03.2003, 21, 45, 22, 21, 11, 2022

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, LRS, the High Court of Judicature, Krishnagiri, the Trial Court, Original Suit No.30, the Respondent Plaintiff, U.R. Narasaiah, U.R. Narasaiah, Appellants, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, Appellants, The Trial Court, the Trial Court, the Trial Court, the Respondent Plaintiff, The Trial Court, the Trial Court, A6, Nos.4, the High Court, the Trial 6 Court, the Respondent Plaintiff, Court, Appellants, the Trial Court, the High Court, the Respondent Plaintiff, Court, the Trial Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, the Respondent Plaintiff, contract.20, Plaintiff, S.A. Muralidharan (PW3, the Respondent Plaintiff, Specific Performance, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Original Defendant/Appellants, Rs.15,00,000/-.22, the Respondent Plaintiff, inter alia, Court, Court, Court, Anr.2, Court, Ramaswamy, D.L.F. Housing and Construction (Pvt.) Ltd., Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, N.P. Thirugnanam, Ors.4, Court, Plaintiff, N.P. Thirugnanam, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Specific Performance, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Appellate Court, Plaintiff, Court, the Privy Council, Court, AIR1928PC20812, Santosh, Hazari, Sri Raja Lakshmi Dyeing Works, Rangaswamy, Sri Raja Lakshmi Dyeing Works v., CPC, Court, Court, High Court, Plaintiff, Court, Campbell, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Court, P.R. Deb and Associates v., Court, Sections 10 and 20, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Specific Performance, Courts, Specific Performance, Court, PW2 & PW3, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff’s, the Respondent Plaintiff’s, Reliance, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, Court, K.V. Balan21, Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, Court, The Trial Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Respondent Plaintiff, the Respondent Plaintiff, Court

PERSON: A. M. KRISHNAMURTHY, JUDGMENT Indira Banerjee, Krishnan Venugopal, Mahesh Thakur, N.D.B Raju, M.A. Chinnasamy, Appellants, U.N. Krishnamurthy, Defendant U. N. Krishnamurthy, N. Anjappa, N. Anjappa, S.A. Muralidharan, M. Murali Reddy, U.N. Krishnamurthy, N. Anjappa.8, Krishnan Venugopal, Venugopal, Venugopal, N.D.B. Raju, Raju, Raju, Raju, N. Anjappa, Man Kaur, Hartar Singh Sangha1, Prem Raj v. D.L.F. Housing and Construction, Venugopal, R. Jagan, Mohan Rao, Nilkanth Dhondiba, K.S. Vidyanadam v. Vairavan6, Jeevan Reddy, Sita Ram, Venugopal, Balraj, H.P. Pyarejan, Flora, Malluru Mallappa v. Kuruvathappa12, Santosh Hazariv, Purushottam Tiwari, Purushottam Tiwari, Madhukar, Madhukar v. Sangram, B.M. Narayana Gowda v. Shanthamma, Shanthamma, H.K.N. Swami, H.K.N. Swami, Basith, Dasappa, Cort v. Ambergate, Rly, K.S. Vidyanadam v. Vairavan, Venugopal, S. Rajalakshmi14, Venugopal, Venugopal, K.S. Vidyanadam v. Vairavan16, Manjunath Anandappa v. Tammanasa 17, Azhar Sultana v. B. Rajamani18, S. Rajalakshmi, K.S. Vidyanadam v. Vairavan, Rani, Kamal Rani, B. Rajamani, Atma Ram v. Charanjit, V. Ramasubramanian, 06.04.2010, Nilkanth Dhondiba Chavan, Raju, K.V. Balan, K.V. Balan, HRISHIKESH

DATE: 30th October 2017, 2011, November 2 2010, 2005, May 1984, 25th April 1987, November 2002, November 2002, March 2003, about 13th February 2003, 10th March 2003, 8th October 2005, about 17th October 2005, November 2002, the 1st week of November, 2002, 11.11.2002, 30th November 2010, 5.16, 30th October 2017, 11.11.2002, 13.02.2003, 10.03.2003, 1963, evidence.19, 15.03.2003, 1963, 1963, 2010, 1963, 1995, 2005, 1963, 6 (1997, 1996, 2018, 3 SCC6589, 1999, 2006, 2020, 2001, 2001, 2011, 2014, 2005, 1980, these days, three months or, four months, two to three decades, a quarter century later, three years, 1996, 1997, 2003, 2009, 2011, three years, 1993, 35, three years, one or two years, three year, three years, 13.10.1999, 2020, 12.11.1996, 12.11.1996, 13.10.1999, 13.02.2003, seven years, 15.3.2003, March 2003, seven years, 48, three days, the last day, nearly 3 years, 2020, 4 weeks, today

ORDINAL: 30th, 9th, 11th, 11th, 11th, fourth, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second, second, first, first, first

LOC: Rs.10,001/-, Specific Performance, Rs.10,001/-, Specific Performance, Specific Performance, Specific Performance

GPE: Ex, money.26, Blanesburgh, Specific Performance.30, Umabai, ignored.33, Hosur, Bengaluru, Hosur, Saradamani Kandappan, Sunanda, Saradamani Kandappan, India, Chand, Azhar Sultana, Saradamani Kandappan, Umabai, contract.50, Bhavyanath, Bhavyanath, Bhavyanath, NEW DELHI

PRODUCT: construction.25, SCC1817

NORP: Ardeshir, Kalawati, H.P. Pyarejan, English

PERCENT: 8 SCC39610, about 10%, 7%

WORK_OF_ART: SCC243

FAC: Justice SB Sinha