Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Raj International Vs. Tripura Jute Mills Ltd.

Decided On : May-26-2008

Court : Guwahati

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution, the Interest Act, the Interest Act, the Arbitration Agreement, Section 16, the Arbitration Act, Article 227 of the Constitution, Section 16(5, the Arbitration Act, Section 16(5, Section 16(2, Section 16, Article 227, Section 16 of the Act, Section 16, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution, Section 16 of the Act, Section 16 of the Act, Section 16 of the Act, Article 227 of the Constitution, Section 16, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 37, Section 9,(b, Section 34.The, Article 227 or under Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 37, Article 227 of the Constitution, Section 16 of the Act, Section 16, Article 227, Article 227, Article 226, Article 226, Article 227, Article 227 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 226, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227, Article 227, Article 227, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 226, Article 227, Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Article 227 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution and, Article 227 of the Constitution, Section 16 of the Act, Section 11, Section 16, Section 11(6, Section 11, Article 227, Constitution, Constitution, Article 227 of the Constitution

ORG: U.B. Saha, Counsel, Tripura Jute Mills Ltd., Industries Department, Second Party, Courts, Arbitration, the Jute Mill, Arbitration, Directorate of Industries & Commerce, TJML, ToThe DirectorDirectorate of Industries & CommerceGoverment of TripuraGurkhabasti, AgartalaSub, M/s Raj International, Tripura Jute Mills Ltd., M/s Raj International, TJ/FI(50, the Law Department, Government of Tripura, Tripura Jute Mills, M/s Raj International, Industries Department, Arbitrator, Industries Department, M/s Raj, Arbitrator, Government of Tripura, Department of Industries & Commerce, Directorate, TJML, Raj International, Tripura Jute Mills, Directorate of Industries & Commerce, Government of Tripura, M/s Raj International, Arbitration, M/s Raj International, Sanat & Associates, Directorate of Commerce, the Arbitration Proceeding, Arbitrator, Arbitrator, Arbitrator, Government of Tripura, Government of Tripura, Department of Industries & Commerce, the Sole Arbitration, Industries & Commerce Department, Government of Tripura, TJML, Directorate of Industries & Commerce, Government of Tripura, Government, Agreement, Tripura Jute Mills Limited, the Raj International, The Tripura Jute Mills Ltd., M/s Raj International, Raj International, Notices, the Raj International, Tripura Jute Mills, the Raj International, Commissioner & Secretary, Government of Tripura, Arbitration, the Directorate of Industries & Commerce, Pandit Neheru Complex, Jute Mills, Jute Mills, Arbitration, Arbitrator, Advocate, Authority, the second party, Authority, Directorate of Industries & Commerce, Arbitration, Legislature, the Jute Mill, the Jute Mill, Court, Court, the Apex Court, SBP & Co., Patel Engineering Ltd., Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Counsel of the, Arbitrator, Court, the Commissioner of Industries & Commerce, Arbitrator, Court, Rajasihan State Mines & Minerals Ltd., Eastern Engineering Enterprises, Government of Tripura, inter alia, Court, Court, Geneva Convention, the Patel Engineering Ltd., the Apex Court, the High Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Apex Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, Court, the High Court, the Government of India Act, the High Courts, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Bakul Debnath v. Orinetal Insurance Co. Ltd., Legislature, Parliament, the State Legislatures, Parliament, the High Courts, Court, High Court, the High Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, the Cacutta High Court, Court, Court, Court, Miss Maneck Custodji Surjarji, the Apex Court, the High Court, the City Civil Court, the Special Civil Application, the High Court, the High Court, the Patel Engineering, Lordship, the Chief Justice, Lordship, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, the Apex Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, Arbitrator, Patel Engineering Limited, Reliance, Euclid, the Apex Court, Union of India, the Apex Court, 4he Patel Engineering, Court, Court, Patel Engineering, Counsel of the respondents, Tribunal, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, I&C, Government of Tripura, Government, Court, Court

PERSON: J.1, S. N. Mitra, D. Jain, R. Dutta, Counsel, G S. Das, Tripura Jute, Jute Mill, Jute Mill, Mill, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, Agartala, Sri A. Dasgupta, Sri A. Dasgupta, Addl, Gurkhabasti, Agartala, Mill, Nalini Sett, Kolkata, Jute Mill, Jute Mill, A. Dasgupta, Addl, Jute Mill, Request, Jute Mill, Jute Mill, A. Dasgupta, a Sole Arbitrator, Shri A. Dasgupta, Shri A. Dasgupta Sole Arbitrator, Agartala, Agartala, a Sole Arbitrator, Agartala, Sole Arbitrator, Gurkhabasti, Jute Mill, Jute Mill, Mitra, Mitra, Jute Mill, Counter, Jute Mill, Mitra, Das, proceedings.(4)(5)**(6, Jute Mill, namely:(a, Surya Dev Rai v. Ram Chander Rai, Nos, Surya Dev Rai, Articles 226, Umaji Keshao Meshraram, Bench, Articles 226, suo motu, Basudebpur Girls' High School, Gouri Rani, Roy, Sarafazali Nawabali Mirza, Vaidya, J., Bahadur Singh, Singh Photti v. State of A.R

DATE: 25th September, 2007, 7th July, 1994, three months, about December, 1994, 1994, August 2003, 28.8.2003, TJ/, 28.8.2003, 29.9.2003, 1978, 1996, 70, 10.1.2004, 22.1.2004, about December, 1994, about 9 years, 15.11.2003, 1st January, 2004, 1978, 1996, 15th November., 2003, 26th December, 2003, February, 2004, 23rd April, 2004, 14.5.2004, two months, 29.9.2003, 20.8.2005, 29.8.2005, more than two years, 25.9.2007, today, October, 2007, 25.9.2007, 1996, July 7, 1994, December, 1994, three years, 2005, 1996, 1996, 1996, 25.9.2007, 21.1.2004, 1996, Seefion 50 and 59, 1915, 2008, 49, 2005, 6113, 2004, 46

PRODUCT: the Sole Arbitrator, Assessment, Memorandum, Para 4, Memorandum, Para-3, Articles, Articles 227

GPE: Counsel, Counsel, Agartala, Kolkata, MD, M.D., Kolkata, Kolkata, TIDAHall, Counsel, Radhikabai

CARDINAL: 31.7.1999, 49, 7.8.1996, 27.5.96.It, 2(two, 1.1.2004, 2,07,28,785.00, one, 6.2.2004, 10.1.2004, 7.7.1994, 6.2.2004, 22.1.2004, 26.12.03, 2,07,28,785/-, two, seven, 3.00, 2.12.2004, 15.5.2004, 25.4.2005, two, two, 22.1.2004, 20.8.2005.14, two, 5.10.2007, two, 15, 22.1.2004, 15.5.2004, 2)(3)(5, 4, about nine, 8, 618.18, 2, 2)(3, 2, 3, 5, 2, 3, 1996.24, 15.5.2004, 6, 2, 3, 46, 5, 26, 38, 227, 107, two, one, 226, 227, two, 3, 4., 2, 227, 228, one, one, 3682.35, one, two, 226, 226

ORDINAL: second, 9th, second, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, second, first, second, 9th, second, second, first, first, second, 2nd, Firstly, Secondly

TIME: 3.00 PM

NORP: Appointing, Appointing, Appointing

FAC: the Para-graph-46, Lordship

LOC: Bimal Sahoo

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //