Faizabad Ayodhya Development Authority Vs. Dr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey

Decided On : May-20-2022

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 11, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 6, Section 17, Section 11 of Act, Section 24(1)(a, Section 48(1, Section 48 of the Act, Section 11, Section 24(1, Section 24(1, Section 24(1, Section 6 of the Act, Section 11A of the Act, Section 24(1, Section 11, Section 24(1, Section 11, Section 24(1, Section 24(1, the Development Authority(s, Section 24(1, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11 8, Section 11, Section 24(1, Section 24(1, Section 11, Section 24, Section 24(2, Section 11, Section 11, Section 24(1, Section 11, Section 24, Section 24(1, Section 24(1, Section 24(1, Section 24(1, Section 11, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 11, Section 24, Section 24 of Act, Section 24(1)(a, Section 9, section 8, section 4, the Registration Act, section 11, Section 24, the Land Acquisition Act, section 11, Land Acquisition Act, section 11, Land Acquisition Act, the Land Acquisition Act, section 11, section 4, Land Acquisition Act, Section 11, Section 11, Section 6, Section 11A of the Act, Section 24, Section 11 of Act, Section 24, Section 24, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 11, Section 11, Section 24 of Act, Section 11 of Act, Section 24, Section 24, Section 11, Section 11 of Act, Article 226 of the Constitution 19, Section 11, Section 11A of Act, Section 6 of the Act, Section 24 of Act, Section 11, Section 11, Land Acquisition Act, Section 6 of the Act, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Section 11 of Act, Section 24, Section 24, Section 11 of Act, Section 24 of Act, the Constitution Bench, Section 24(2, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24(1)(b, Section 24(2, Section 24(2, Section 19(7, Section 69, Section 69, Section 11, Section 24, Section 24, Section 114, Section 6, Section 24, Section 24(2, Section 114, Section 6, the General Clauses Act, Section 24, Section 24(b, Section 114, Section 6, Section 24, Section 24(2, Section 24(2, Section 114, Section 6, Section 24(2, Section 24, Rule 8(1, Rule 8(1, Rule 8(1, Rule 8(1, Section 3, Rule 8(1, Rule 8(1, Rule 8(1, Rule 2, Section 24, Section 24(2, Section 19(7, Section 19(1, the Explanation to Section 69(2, Section 11, Section 24(2, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 6, an Amendment Act, Explanation 1, Section 6(1, the Explanation to Section 11-A, Amendment Act 68 of 1984, Section 24(2, Section 11-A., Section 11, Section 24(2, Section 6, Section 6, Section 5-A, Section 6, Section 5-A, Section 6, Section 5-A, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6 of the Act, Section 24(2, Section 24, Section 18(5, the Coal Act, the Coal Act, the Coal Act, the Coal Act, the Coal Act, Section 24(2, Section 24(2, Chapter XXI-E of the Patna High Court Rules, Roman Law, Section 10, Section 10, Section 7 of the 1952 Act, Article 62(1, Section 21, Section 24, Section 24(2, the new Act, Section 80, Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 144 CPC, Section 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 144, Section 144.28, Article 226, Article 142(1, Section 144, Section 144, Section 144

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, No.2915 OF2022Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority, No.2917 OF2022Moradabad, Development Authority & Anr, Appellants Versus Babu & Ors, No.2918 OF2022Moradabad, Development Authority & Anr, Singh & Ors, No.2919 OF2022Moradabad, Development Authority, Malka Begum & Ors, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, the High Court, Rehabilitation, Development Authorities, District Faizabad, the Faizabad Development Authority, Writ Petition No.3810, The High Court, Authority, Authority, the High Court, the High Court, Parliament, Vide, the High Court, the State Government, the Appropriate Authority, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Faizabad-Ayodhya Development Authority, the High Court, Moradabad Development Authority, the Moradabad Development Authority, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Moradabad Development Authority, Moradabad Development Authority, the High Court, Writ Petition No.31806, the High Court, Writ Petition No.29247, the Moradabad Development Authority, the Moradabad Development Authority, Development Authority(s, Development Authority(s, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Authority, the High Court, Plot Nos, the High Court, the High Court, the Moradabad Development Authority, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Development Authority(s, Court, Indore Development Authority Vs, Ors, Court, Court, Court, Court, Development Authorities, Indore Development Authority, Court, Court, Authority, Court, Court, Indore Development Authority, Court, Indore Development Authority, Court, the High Court, the Development Authorities, Authority, the High Court, Court, Authorities, this Court is:-, Authority, the High Court, Rehabilitation, the Land Acquisition (Amendment, Indore Development Authority, District Magistrate, the Special Land Acquisition Officer, the High Court, the Civil Court, Court, Collector/Land Acquisition Officer, the Collector/Land Acquisition Officer, Court, Court, Indore Development Authority, Court, Parliament, Parliament, Government, DDA v. Sukhbir Singh, Court, High Courts, this Court in Union of India v. Modi Rubber Ltd., Modi Rubber Ltd., the Central Excise Rules, the Central Excises, the Central Excises, the Central Excises, the Central Government, the Central Excises, the Central Government, the Central Excises, Notification No.255/77-C.E., the Central Government, the Central Excises, the Central Government, the Central Excises, the Executive Department, the Central Excises, the Central Excises, Sree Balaji Nagar, T.N., T.N., Court, T.N., State, the Land Acquisition (Amendment, SCC133, Abhey Ram v. Union of India, Court, Court, Court, Union of India, the High Court, Court, Court, Yusufbhai Noormohmed, Union of India, Court, Court, Court, Union of India, Court, Parliament, Court, para8, The High Court's, The High Court, Parliament, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Registrar, Court, Tarapada Dey, NDMC, India Ltd., Court, Court, Broom, Legal Maxims, Court, HUDA, Court, ILR, HUDA, para5, HUDA, ILR, ILR, Court, Court, Legal Maxims, Craies on Statute Law, Standard Chartered Bank v. Directorate of Enforcement, Court, AIR, para5, GTC Industries Ltd., Union of India, U.P., Grindlays Bank Ltd., CIT, neutralised.324, Court, U.P., Court, Vide Shiv Shankar v., U.P. SRTC, GTC Industries Ltd., Union of India, U.P., Court, Grindlays Bank Ltd., CIT, Mines & Geology, Court, Court, Department of Mines & Geology, No.4030, KAR, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, The High Court, Court, the State Government, the State Government, State, A.R. Antulay, Court, A.R. Antulay, Court, para102, Montreal Street Railway Co., State, para5, Keshardeo Chamria, SCR, AIR, State, State, State, Court, State of M.P., Court, South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., State of M.P., U.P., Supp SCC505, 7th Edn, CPC, State, Essar Oil Ltd., Court, SCC430, Court, Court, Indian Council, Indian Council, U.P., SCC620 this Court, Jeewan Nath Wahal, U.P., the High Court, Court, Grindlays Bank Ltd., CIT, the High Court, Court, Balsara Hygiene Products Ltd., Court, Marshall Sons & Co., the Delhi High Court, Court, the High Court, The High Court, the Delhi High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Marshall Sons & Co., Court, Indian Council, SCC161 Grindlays Bank Ltd., CIT, U.P., Marshall Sons & Co., P) Ltd., Kalabharati Advertising

PERSON: Rajesh Kumar, Versus Smt, J.1, No.2915, Ranopali, Nos, Award, 5,11,60,606.00, V.K. Shukla, Shri S.R., Shri Shukla, DDA v. Sukhbir Singh, Benches, CER-8(3)/55-C.E., Notification No.95/61-C.E., Notification No.23/55-C.E., Residential Assn, Yogesh Neema, Residential Assn, Sundara Rao v. State, V. Chandrasekaran v. Administrative Officer, Hansraj H. Jain v. State, Sangappa Gurulingappa Sajjan v. State, Gandhi Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd., Roshnara Begum v. Union, Chandra Kishore Jha v. Mahavir Prasad, Mohd, Gazi v. State of M.P., curiae neminem, curiae neminem, Kumar Dey, Singh v., Cannanore Spg, para30, Babeswar Kanhar, Sambasiva Chari v. Ramasami Reddi, Babeswar Kanhar, Babeswar Kanhar, Sambasiva Chari v. Ramasami Reddi, Hossein Ally v., curiae neminem, curiae neminem, Mrutunjay Pani, Narmada Bala Sasmal, C.L. Mishra, Ram Krishna Verma v. State, Amarjeet Singh v. Devi Ratan, Ram Krishna Verma, Krishna Verma v. State, Amarjeet Singh v., Devi Ratan, curiae neminem, Supp, Jaipur Municipal Corpn, C.L. Mishra, Ram Krishna Verma v. State, curiae neminem, curiae neminem, Karnataka Rare Earth, A.R. Antulay, R.S. Nayak, curiae neminem, A.R. Antulay, R.S. Nayak, Buckmaster, Ramprakash P. Puri, Alexander Rodger, Alexander Rodger v., Comptoir D'Escompte De Paris, LR3PC465:17, Bench, Radha Kissen Chamria, curiae neminem, Zafar Khan v. Board of Revenue, John D. Calamari &, Joseph M. Perillo, A. Arunagiri Nadar, S.P. Rathinasami, Law, 4th Edn, Vol, A. Shanmugam, Ariya Kshatriya, Rajakula Vamsathu, Dr Bhandari, J.was, Ram Krishna Verma v. State, Sahi Oretrans, Harijan Sewak, Harijan Sewak, Padmawati, Harijan Sewak Sangh, Sahi Oretrans, Ouseph Mathai v. M. Abdul Khadir, para13, Sahi Oretrans, Hemant Vimalnath Narichania

WORK_OF_ART: The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition,, Authority, X X X X306, Normandin, X X X X329, Jeewan Nath Wahal v. State

DATE: 2013, 2013, 2013, 1894, 1894, 2022 3, 2005, 1894, 2013, 10.04.2007, 27.09.2010, 2005, 1894, 1894, 13.03.2012, 2012, 2013, 1894, 4 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2022 4, 20.07.2017, 2013, 2013, two years, 1894, 1894, 2013, 2013, 1894, 2013, 1894, 2013, 2013, 2022, 2022 5, 2022, 20.07.2017, 2013, 2022, 20.07.2017, 2011, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2022, 1894, 1894, 2917, 2918, 2919, 2022, 1894, 2013, 2013, 2013, 1894, 2020, 2013, 2013, 2013, 1894, 301, 1894, 2013, 2013, Section 24(1, 2013, 1894, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2917, 2918, 2919, 2022, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 1894, 2013, 2013, 1894, 2013?.10, 1894, 2013, 2013, 2013, 1894, the day, 1908, 16 of 1908, a period of, two years, 1984, 68 of 1984, a period of, two years, 2013, 1894, 1894, 1894, five years, 1894, a period of, two years, the period of two years, a period of, two years, two-year, two years, 1894, two years, 2013, 1894, five years, 2013, five years, 2013, 2013, 1894, 1894, 2013, 1894, 2013, 1894, 1894, 2013, 1894, 2013, 1894, 2013, 2013, 1894, 2013, 2013, 2013, 2013, 1894, 2013, 1894, 2013, 2013, 1894, 1894, a period of, two years, 1894, two years, 1894, 2013, 2013, 2013, 1894, 2013, 2013, 2013, 1894, 2013, 1894, 2013, 1894, 2013, 1894, 2013, 2013, 1894, 1894, 2013, 2013, 1894, 2013, 2013, five years, five years, 301, 5 years, five years, five years, five years, 2016, 16, five years, 2016, five years, 5 years, 5 years, 1897, 1897, 1897, the 5 years, 1897, Five years' period, 5 years, 1986, 1986, 72-74, 1944, 1944, 1944, 1944, 1944, 1944, 1944, 1955, 1977, 9-1955, 4-1961, 1955, 1944, 1944, 1944, 1944, 2015, 2016, 2015, five years, 2002, 1894, 1984, five years, 11-A., a period of, two years, 1984, a period of, two years, the period of, two years, 2012, 1997, 1988, 1991, 1993, 1994, 1993, 1991, 1996, 1997, 2010, 72, 1989, 1999, the next day, 2000, 1987, 1996, 2002, 2005, 1899, 2005, 28-11-2001, 30-11- 2001, 1897, 1899, the next working day, the next day 41, 1880, 1974, 2005, 5 years, 1355, five years, 1998, 2005, 1992, 1980, 1995, 2010, 1992, 2010, 1995, 1998, 2005, 18, 1992, 1980, 2004, 46, 1988, 1988, 1917, 1969, 1969-71, 1953, 49 ‘21, the period of 5 years, 2003, 2003, 26-28, 1984, 1315, 1908, 1970, 2012, 2012, 451- 55, para37, 2011, 1992, 2011, 1980, 1994, 1999, 2008, Del 1202, 6-11- 2008, 58, 2008, Del 1202, 20 or 30 years, all those years, all these years', 2008, 2012, 1999, 2002, 2011, 1980, 1992, 1999, 2010

QUANTITY: 17.172 hectares

CARDINAL: 03.13, 407, 413, 415, 1 to 4, 3.1, three, three, three, three, 3, three, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 54.1, 4.2, 20, 4.3, 4.4, 7, 7.1, 7.2, 407, 413, 415, three, three, 7.4, 7.5, 8, 366.8, 7.6, 366.8, 107.7, 284, 285, 287, 289, 293, 297, 299, 300, 302, 306, 308, 309, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 323, 324, 325, 326, 329, 334, 335, 8.1, 11, 1, 8.3, 8.4, 129, 1, 11 and 11A, 11, 1, 13, 1, 2, 1, 3, 2, 14, 4, 2, 11A., 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 15, 16, 10.3, 2, 10.4, 17, 10.5, 1, 10.6, 18, 10.7, One, 10.8, 10.9, two, 20, 10.10, 10.11, 21, 10.12, 31.12.2013, 22, 10.13, 2, 366.8, 366.8, 1, 23, 284, 285, 287, 289, 293, 297, 299, 300, 302, 306, 308, 309, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 321, 323, 324, 325, 326, 329, 334, 284, two, 24, 16, 25, 26, 27, 4, 4, 7, two, 28, 17, 20, 31-12-1955, 29, two, 29, 30, 3, 6, 3, 361, 11-12, 11, 31, 3, 33, 12, 5, 428-29, 9, 367, 34, 4, 4, 3, 1, one, 44, 35, one, 3, 36, 416-17, 8, 37 309, 8, 6, 4, 38, 347, 7, 4, 2, 5, 71, 39, 30, 317, 1, 22, 179, 1, 192-93, 5, 30-10-2001, 1, 2, 22, 5, 3-12-2001, 2, 15, 42, 162-63, 268).319, 4, 43, 5, 3, 8, 44, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 422-23, 17-18, 17, 2, 3, 8, 2, 2, 2, one, 790-91, 10-11, 10, one, 1-12-1998, 47, 5, 326, 687, 102, 48, 3, 159, 5, four, 153, 28, 335, 339, 335, 51, one, 8 SCC648, 662, 26, three, 52, 27, 53, 336, 3, 542, 61-62, 61, 54, one, 9, 434).337, 6, 37, 8, one, 238, 171, 183, 170, 171, 2, 630, 55, 16, 50, 12, 29, 2, 50, 56, 26, 5 SCC380, 391, 22, 144, 2, 326-27, 4, one, 57, 6, One, 9, 59, 460, 1, 183, 2, 4, 326-27, 4, one, 60, 1, 328, 13, 8, 2, 2, 2, 9, two

GPE: Plot Nos, Faizabad, Singh, Manoharlal, India, C.E., Padma, B.R. Gupta v., Gujarat, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Karnataka, Murari, Lindley, L.J., pp, Karnataka Rare Earth v., India, Gujarat, Halsbury, Kavita, Trehan, para22, India, Padmawati, Delhi, Padmawati, Padmawati, India, India

PRODUCT: Award, Act, Bench

PERCENT: 80%, 80%, 12%, 12%, 9%

EVENT: the 2013 Act

NORP: CER-8(1)/55, Nendoliya, Latin, English, Roman, Latin, South Eastern Coalfields Ltd.

TIME: the same Act, up to 4.15 p.m. i.e. working hours, 3.15 p.m.

MONEY: a penny

LANGUAGE: English, English

ORDINAL: first, first, 10th, first, third

LOC: South Eastern Coalfields