Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Rathish Babu Unnikrishnan Vs. The State Govt Of Nct Of Delhi
Decided On : Apr-26-2022
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 482, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 251, Section 482, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 138, Section 118, the N.I. Act, Section 56, the Companies Act, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 482 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Section 482 Cr, Section 138, Section 56(1, the Companies Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138, Section 482 CrPC, Section 138, the NI Act, Section 138, the NI Act, Section 139 of the NI Act, Section 138, Section 482, Section 482 CrPC, Page 15, Page 16
ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, SLP, VERSUS The State (, Respondent(s, Delhi High Court, Page 1 of, no.2, the Magistrate’s Court, The High Court, Court, AAT Academy, Court, Court, Magistrate, the Delhi High Court, HMT Watches Limited, M.A. Abida & Anr1, Rajiv Thapar & Ors, the High Court, Court, Court, dismissed.8, Court, Page 7, Articles of Association, M.M.T.C. Ltd. & Anr, Medchl Chemicals, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, NI, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Court, CrPC, State, Haryana v. Bhajan Lal6, FIR, Court, The High Court, Court, Court, un, Court, the High Court, Court
PERSON: Unnikrishnan Appellant(s, JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, Crl, Satish Gupta, Krishnamohan K., K.M. Nataraj, Rebecca M. John, Madan Lal Kapoor2, Bench, Pharma, S.N. Variava, K.G. Balakrishnan, Sri Mohan4, Rajeshbhai Muljibhai Patel, State, R. Banumathi, S. Ratnavel Pandian, Rajiv Thapar, Harry Brown, J.[K.M. JOSEPH
CARDINAL: NCT, 1.6.2018, 16, one, 2, 4, 3, 16, 1, 4, four, one, 5, 11, 3 SCC330Page 6, 16, transferee, transferee, 8, two, 17, three, 1, 9, 16, 26, 22, 4, 3, 16, two, 103, 6, 12, 16, 28, 13, 16, 14, 16, 16, 16
GPE: Delhi, P.C., India, Rangappa, Yogeshbhai, CC, P.C.
DATE: 1973, 1881, the impugned order.3, 2013, 16, 16, 2013, 2013, earlier days, 2002, 2010, 11, 2020, 2016, 11 of 1614, today
ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first
PRODUCT: Appellant 3 and Respondent 2
NORP: American