The State Of Maharashtra Vs. 63 Moons Technologies Ltd

Decided On : Apr-22-2022

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the MPID Act, the MPID Act, the MPID Act, Section 4, Section 2(d, the MPID Act, the Companies Act, Section 27, Section 209A, the Companies Act, the Indian Penal Code, the MPID Act, the Indian Penal Code 1860, the Economic Offences Wing9, the MPID Act, a Division Bench, Section 2, the MPID Act, Section 4, Section 4, Section 5 and Section 8, Section 4, Constitution, Constitution, Article 300-A of the Constitution and, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 4, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 4, Section 2(c, the MPID Act, Section 2, the MPID Act, Section 4, Section 4, the MPID Act, the MPID Act, Section 7, Section 10, Section 11, Section 2(d, the MPID Act, Section 2(c, the Companies Act, Section 10, the MPID Act, Article 32, Section 2(c, the MPID Act, Section 4, the MPID Act, the MPID Act, the MPID Act, the MPID Act, the MPID Act, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Order 37, Section 3 of the MPID Act, Section 3, Section 4, Section 4, Section 6, Section 7, Section 5, Order 37, the Civil Procedure Code 1908, Section 11, Section 4, the MPID Act 30, Section 4, Section 4, Section 2(d, section 5, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 5(c, the Banking Regulation Act 1949, the MPID Act, section 5, the Banking Regulation Act, section 2, the Chit Funds Act, Section 2(f, Section 2, Section 2(2, Section 2(2, Section 2(c, Section 2(c, Section 2(c, the MPID Act, Section 2(c, the MPID Act, the MPID Act 38, Chapter 12, Section 2(c, the MPID Act, Section 4, Section 396(3, Article 226, Noticee 1:

DATE: 2022, 2748-49, 2022, 22 August 2019, 19991, 1956, 5 June 2007, 19524, one-day, the trading day, two days, the end of the day, the next day, the day, 27 April 2012, 12 July 2012, July 2013, 31 July 2013, the expiry of 15 days, 6 August 2013, 14 August 2013, 16 August 2013, 20 August 2013, every week, 16 August 2013, August 14, 2013 Settlement Schedule, July 31 2013, Friday, the 16th August, 2013, Tuesday, the 20th August, 2013, every week, Friday, August 16, 2013, Tuesday, August 2013, 19 September 2014, 23 July 2008, 27 August 2013, 30 September 2013, 468,471,474, one-day, fifteen days, 14 August 2013, seven months, 1 October 2015, 21 September 2016, 1000, October 2016, 21 September 2016, 19, 4 April 201811, 7 April 201812, 11 April 201813, 19 April 201814, 15 May 201815, October 201816, 19 April 2018, 11 15, 22 August 2019, the end of the day, 31 July 2013, 4 August 2014, 16 August 2013, 17, 2019, 24 October 2018, 60 days, 2012, 2011, 2017, 2015, 31 March 2017, 24 March 2018, 2019 23 (1978, the same day, 199724, 19, 21, 21 January 2000, six years, six years, tender days, the day, the next day, every year, 34 29, 1949, companies25, 1992, 2912, 38, 1949, 1964, 1982, 2005, 2013, 2009, 2008, 1999 31, 1999 32, 1999, 1999, 2000 42, 44, 49, 35-37 days, 390 days, 390 days, 35-55 days, 2008, 28 March 2013, 2012 to June 2013, 10 July 2013, May 2011, 6 January 2014, 18 August 2014, 15 October 2014, 12 February 2016, September 2009, November 2009, 198 days, the fifteen- month, between 2009 through to 2013, April 2012 to June 2013, 16-5-2011, 17.12.2013, July 2013, 5500

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos, Moons Technologies Ltd., The High Court’s Judgment, the Bombay High Court, the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors, Financial Establishments, National Spot Exchange Ltd2, NSEL, Financial Technologies, Moons Technologies, the Union of India, NSEL, NSEL, FCRA, basmati, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, T+2, T+2, NSEL Money, NSEL, NSEL, aMccoonuenyt, NSEL, T+2 Commodity Seller NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, Exchange, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL’s Operations Department, NSEL, Delivery Department, NSEL’s Delivery Department, the Operations Department, Warehouse, the Operations Department, VAT, the Delivery Allocation Report, NSEL, Delivery Note, the Department of Consumer, NSEL, DCA, NSEL, NSEL, Exchange, National Spot Exchange, DCA, Bye-Laws and Business Rules, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Rules and Bye laws.3, National Spot Exchange Ltd., Central Government, The Forward Markets, DCA, NSEL, FMC, NSEL, The Union of India, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, Vostak Far East Securities Prvt., NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, FMC, NSEL, the Settlement Guarantee Fund8, NSEL, FIR, Mumbai Police, Sections 3 and 4 of the MPID Act, FIR, the Special Court, the MPID Act.10 NSEL, the High Court, EOW, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, EOW, NSEL, NSEL, Court, The State of Maharashtra, M/s La-Fin Financial Services Pvt. Ltd., M/s La-, Financial Services Pvt. Ltd., the State Government, Financial Establishment, Government, Financial Establishment, the Financial Establishment, the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Deposits, The Supreme Court, the Special Leave Petition, the Bombay High Court, Sections 4, Exhibit-S, The State of Maharashtra, Sections 4, No.1118, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay Stock Exchange, VAT, TDS, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, FIR, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, EOW, Exchange, NSEL, EOW, Exchange, FMC, NSEL, NSEL, IPC, the Supreme Court, Moons Technologies v. Union of India17, the Gujarat High Court, Home Department, Government of Maharashtra, Sections 409,465, IPC, the Supreme Court, Maharashtra, NSEL, the Supreme Court, Gandhi and Co., NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, the High Court, the Designated Court, the Designated Court, the High Court, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, New Horizon Sugar Mills Ltd., Court, Court, State, KS Palanichamy,20, PGF v. Union of India21, Moons Technologies, NSEL, State, the Home Department, NSEL, EOW, The State of Maharashtra, NSEL, IPC, The Bombay High Court, Committee, Committee, the Bombay High Court, NSEL, NSEL, Court, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, Court, the Tamil Nadu Protection of Interests of Depositors, Financial Establishments, Court, Court, Financial Establishment, the Designated Court, NSEL, NSEL, The Statement of Objects, Financial Establishments, the State of Maharashtra, Financial Establishments, the State of Maharashtra, Financial Establishments, the State of Maharashtra, Financial Establishment, Financial Establishment, Financial Establishment, Government, Government, a Competent Authority, a Designated Court, the Designated Court, Designated Court, Designated Court, the Designated Court, the State of Maharashtra, NSEL, NSE20It, NSEL, NSEL, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, these Bye-Laws, the Business Rules and Regulations of the Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, the Board of Directors, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, the Business Rules of the Exchange, Exchange, the Business Rules of the Exchange, Bye-Law 7.10.2, Exchange, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, Exchange, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, the Clearing House of the Exchange, The Clearing House of the Exchange, the Relevant Committee, Exchange, the Clearing House, the Clearing House, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Delivery Orders, the Clearing House, the Business Rules or Regulations, Exchange, Delivery Orders, Clearing, the Clearing House, Clearing House, the Relevant Authority, The Relevant Authority, the Relevant Authority, The Relevant Authority, Exchange, Delivery Orders, The Relevant Authority, Exchange, the Clearing House, the Clearing House, Exchange, the Clearing House, Exchange, the Clearing House, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, the Clearing House, Exchange, The Clearing House, the Clearing House, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, the Clearing House, Exchange, Exchange, the Clearing House, Exchange, the Relevant Authority, the Relevant Authority, Exchange, Exchange, the Clearing House, the Relevant Authority, a Settlement Guarantee Fund, The Settlement Guarantee Fund, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Settlement Guarantee Fund 12.1.1, Exchange, Settlement Guarantee Fund, Exchange, the Relevant Authority, Settlement Guarantee, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, the Relevant Authority, The Settlement Guarantee Fund, Exchange, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, Rules, Business Rules and Regulations of the Exchange, The Relevant Authority, inter alia, Exchange, the Clearing House of the exchange, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, the Relevant Authority, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, Guarantees, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, Exchange, the Relevant Authority, Guarantees, Exchange, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, Guarantees, the Clearing House, Exchange, the Clearing House, Exchange, Investment of Settlement Guarantee Fund Funds, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, Business Rules and Regulations, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, The Settlement Guarantee Fund, these Bye-Laws and Regulations, Authority, Settlement Guarantee Fund, Settlement Guarantee Fund, these Bye-Laws, Rules, Business Rules and Regulations of the Exchange, the Relevant Authority, Default Reserve Fund, the Relevant Authority, Exchange, these Bye-Laws, Rules, Business Rules and Regulations of the Exchange, Bye-Laws, Rules, Business Rules and Regulations of the Exchange, the Relevant Authority, Meet Obligations Whenever, Exchange, these Bye-Laws, Rules and Regulations of the Exchange, the Relevant Authority, Settlement Guarantee, the Relevant Authority, Exchange, Rules, Business Rules and Regulations of the Exchange, the Relevant Authority, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, the Relevant Authority, Exchange, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Clearing, the Settlement Guarantee Fund, Guarantee Fund, Exchange, the Relevant Authority, Exchange, Exchange, the Relevant Authority, the Relevant Authority, the Relevant Authority, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, The Relevant Authority, Government, Financial Establishment, Government, Financial Establishment, NSEL, State Government, the Central Government, Financial Establishment, State, the Central Government, NSEL, Financial Establishment, the Securities and Exchange Board, New Horizon Sugar Mills Limited v. Government of Pondicherry, the Industrial Development Bank of India, State Financial Corporation, the Industrial Development Bank of India Act, State, Chit, Court, the Protection of Women, Court, Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation, the Financial Establishments, The Odisha Protection of Interests of Depositors, Financial Establishments, The Kerala Protection of Interests of Depositors, Financial Establishments, The Goa Protection of Interests of Depositors, The Telangana Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act, The Andhra Pradesh Protection of Depositors of Financial Establishments Act, The Sikkim Protection, Financial Establishments, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, a Settlement Guarantee Fund, NSEL, SGF, SGF, Black’s Law Dictionary, State Bar Associations, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, SGF, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, SGF, SGF, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, The Operations Department, the Delivery Department, the Operations Department, VAT, NSEL, Delivery Note, NSEL, the Operations Department, the Delivery Department, NSEL, the Business Rules of the Exchange, Agricultural, NSEL, NSEL, Commodity Duration Investment, Castor Oil T+5 & T+30, Paddy T+2 & T+25, Steel T+2 & T+25, Crude Soybean T+2 & T+25, DOC T+2 & T+25, Refined Mustard T+2 & T+25, Palmolein T+2 & T+25, T+2 & T+25, NSEL, NSEL, Exchange, NSEL, T+2, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, Bank FD, NSEL Trade, Exchange, Warehouse Management includes Selection, Accreditation, Quality Resting,, Fumigation and Insurance, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, FMC, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, Exchange, Board, NSEL, NSEL, FMA, NSEL, the Warehouse Development and Regulatory Authority, NSEL, Delivery Allocation Reports, C.4, Judgment 47 NSEL, Court, EOW, NSEL, NSEL, FMC, the Union of India, NSEL, the Bombay High Court, Department of Economic Affairs, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Moons and NSEL, Moons and NSEL, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, NSEL, NSEL, The Board of NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, Geojit Comtrade Ltd., NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, Lotus Refineries, Exchange, NSEL, NSEL, the Settlement Fund, NSEL, FTIL, NSEL, The Warehouse Development and Regulatory Authority, NSEL, NSEL, Authority, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, Delivery Allocation Reports, DAR, FMC, Moons and NSEL, Financial Technologies, FTIL, NSEL, FTIL, FTIL, Board, NSEL, NSEL, NSEL, FTIL, NSEL, FTIL, NSEL, M/s

CARDINAL: 63, 2750-51, 17, 25, 27, 2(d, 40, 49, 55, 55, 2 63, 2, 63, 3, 2, 3, 63, 4, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 5, about 13,000, approximately Rs 5,600, 6,032, 8 6, 63, 63, 63, 25, 409, 465, 477A, 202, 6, 8, 8, 9, 10, 9, 1, 10, 26, 11, 5, 300, 5, 19, 21.09.2016, 21.09.2016, 5, 11, 19, 5, 11, 14, 11 12, two, 13, 24, 14, one, 467, 63, 17, one, 467,468, 471, 474, 18, 4822.53, 12, 16, 13, 17, 63, 14, 18, 10, 3, 16, 13, one, 63, 4,676, 3,397, 136.98, 760, five, 19, 63, 63, more than 50,000, 800, 2 million, 63, 22, 15, 100, 15, 21, 1, 2, 24, Five, six, 17, one, one, one, 23, one, 24, 19, 2.17, 2.18, 2.51, 25, 21, 2.96, 3.7, one, one, 22, 4.20(a, 26, 7.11, 7.11, 9, 9.5, 9.6, 9.5, 27, 9.6, 23, 10, 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, one, 10.4, 10.5, 28, 24, 10.7, 10.8, 10.8, 29, 10.11, 10.12, 25Thus, 10.14, 10.15, 10.16, 10.14, 30, 10.15, 10.16, 26, 12, 12.1, 27, 31, 12.2.5, 32, 28, 12.3, 12.4, 12.5, 4, 12.5, 33, 12.6, 12.7, 12.8, 12.7, 12.11, 12.11 Allocation, 12.12, 12, 36, 3, 2(d, 4, 1, 31, 25, 10, 32, 26, 15, 33, five, 34, 27, 3, 5, 35, 2, one, 36, 28, 25,000, 37, 43, 4.12, 4.12, two, 39, 35, 11, 44, 45, 41, three, 46, 2.96, 4.20, 47, 10.11, 43, 48, 45, 7.5, 3.5, 4.5, 3.5, 1.8, 1.7, two, 50, two, 51, 46, nine, ten, 236.5, 52, 120, 6,000, 2 63, 5,600, 24, 3,365, 5,000, two, 53, 63, three, 3,365, 835.88, 48, 63, 63, two, 1.3, 541.4, 1.5, 1, 30, More than 1800, 1.12, 55, 28-3-2013, 236.5, 63, 15.1, 14.7

PERSON: Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Calendar, Santhosh Mansingh Asst, Grant Thornton LLP, Articles 14, Articles 14, Certiorari, Pankaj Saraf, Sonal Hemant Joshi v. State, B. Submissions, Jayant Mehta, Vikramjit Banerjee, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Crores, Mohinder Singh Gill v. CEC23, SCC40520, Mukul Rohatgi, Articles 14, C. Analysis C. 1 Framework, Reasons, Bill, C. 2 Framework, Bye Law 12.2, d. Meeting, Explanation I., Indra Sarma, Bhailal Patel, Andhra Pradesh33, Thomson Reuters, Buyer, Cotton Wash Oil T+2 & T+25, Trader, Trader, Grant Thornton LLP, Jignesh Shah, VC Daga, Solomon, Bench, Grant Thornton, Grant Thornton, Grant Thornton, Grant Thornton, Grant Thornton, Grant Thornton, Shri Jignesh Shah, Shri Joseph Massey, Shri Shreekant Javalgekar, Grant Thornton

PERCENT: 99.99%, 8%, 8%, 14% to 16%, 14 to 16%, 14 to 16%, 14-16%, 0.1%, 16%, 16%, 99.9%, 12.8 Utilisation, 16%, 16%, 9 16%, 10 16%, 16%, 16%, 16%, 16%, 16%, 16%, 6.5 16%, 6.5 16%, 6.5 16%, 6.5 16%, 3.0 16%, 3.0 16%, 16%, about 16%, 16%, 10-15%, about 16%, 16%

MONEY: 1 “MPID Act, 18 Section 5, 12.6 Administration and Utilization of Settlement Guarantee Fund

QUANTITY: one ton

WORK_OF_ART: Broker Places, 7 FIR, a Writ Petition, a. The Hon’ble Court, Any Financial Establishment, Certified Warehouse, Client Security Fund, Opportunities  Traders, Features of Trading Opportunity

ORDINAL: 16th, second, second, third, first, first

GPE: Pankaj, Financial Establishment, Pondicherry, US, States, Bhaskaran, Mumbai, India, Gujarat, Orissa28, Mumbai

NORP: Scheduled, Mandamus, KK Bhaskaran, Gujarat, a)The, Maharashtra, investment:12, c., d., Maharashtra

PRODUCT: Schedule, Respondent

FAC: Sections 4, the Impugned Notification, Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu Act, the Tamil Nadu Act

LOC: Respondent, KK Bhaskaran, the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Exchange