Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Padam Kumar JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Mar-01-1996

Court : Patna

LAW: Section 256(2, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 256(1, Section 256(2, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 256(1, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 256(1, Section 271(1)(c

PERSON: D.P. Wadhwa, Jain, Jain, S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.8

DATE: 1961, 1961, 1967-68, September 13, 1965, February 8, 1961, September 13, 1965, March 20, 1967, the assessment year 1967-68, August 18, 1968, the year 1967-68, 1967-68, 1967-68, 1967-68, 1967-68, this year, this year, a different year, September 13, 1965, September 13, 1965, that year, 1967-68, this year, the assessment year 1966-67, this year, August 28, 1968, this year, the earlier year, this year, a different year, this year, this assessment year, almost four years, a later year, August 28, 1968, the year 1967-68

ORG: Bench, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench ', Patna, the Public Works Department, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, income.4, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, the Public Works Department, the Appellate Tribunal, Department, the Supreme Court, CIT, Hindustan Housing and Land Development Trust Limited

CARDINAL: 11,352, 2, 52,386, 11,352, 11,352, 11,352, 11,352, 11,352, three, 1, 2, 11,352, 3, 11,352, 5, 1986]161ITR524(SC

GPE: Bihar

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //