Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Padam Kumar JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Decided On : Mar-01-1996
Court : Patna
LAW: Section 256(2, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 256(1, Section 256(2, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 256(1, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 256(1, Section 271(1)(c
PERSON: D.P. Wadhwa, Jain, Jain, S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J.8
DATE: 1961, 1961, 1967-68, September 13, 1965, February 8, 1961, September 13, 1965, March 20, 1967, the assessment year 1967-68, August 18, 1968, the year 1967-68, 1967-68, 1967-68, 1967-68, 1967-68, this year, this year, a different year, September 13, 1965, September 13, 1965, that year, 1967-68, this year, the assessment year 1966-67, this year, August 28, 1968, this year, the earlier year, this year, a different year, this year, this assessment year, almost four years, a later year, August 28, 1968, the year 1967-68
ORG: Bench, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Patna Bench ', Patna, the Public Works Department, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, income.4, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, the Public Works Department, the Appellate Tribunal, Department, the Supreme Court, CIT, Hindustan Housing and Land Development Trust Limited
CARDINAL: 11,352, 2, 52,386, 11,352, 11,352, 11,352, 11,352, 11,352, three, 1, 2, 11,352, 3, 11,352, 5, 1986]161ITR524(SC
GPE: Bihar