Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Assa Singh (d) By Lrs. Vs. Shanti Parshad (d) By Lrs. .

Decided On : Nov-17-2021

Court : Supreme Court of India

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, Section 24, the Regular Second Appeal No.1777, Section 25, Section 25 of the Act, Section 25, Section 116, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 116 of Evidence Act, Section 116 of Evidence Act, Section 116 of the Evidence Act, Section 116 of the Evidence Act, Section 25, the Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 4(6, Section 5, Section 39, Section 40, Section 41, Section 42, Section 43, Section 42, Chapter VII, Section 76, Section 78, Section 80, the Tenancy Act, Section 82, Section 84, Section 88, Section 89, Section 98 13, section 2, the “Resettlement Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 2, the Resettlement Act, Section 9, the Punjab Tenancy Act, Section 10 of this Act, Punjab Act, Section 23, Section 24, the Punjab Tenancy Act, Section 25, Section 25 of the Act, the Section 25, Section 14A, the Tenancy Act, Section 25, Section 25, Section 10A, Section 18 of the Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 25 of the Act, the Punjab Tenancy Act, Section 24, Section 18, Section 18, Section 18, Section 25, Section 18 of the Act, Section 7, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1)(a, Section 7(1)(a, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 77, the Tenancy Act, Section 77(3, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 7(1, Section 77(3, the Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 77, the Tenancy Act, the Punjab Tenancy Act, Section 25, Section 14A, Section 77, Section 45(5, Section 50, Section 46, Section 45(5, Section 25, Section 10B, Section 10A(b, Section 25, Section 77, the Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 77(3, the Tenancy Act, Section 18 of the Act, Section 18, Section 25 of the Act, Section 18, Section 25, the Punjab Tenancy Act, section 77, the Punjab Tenancy Act, Punjab Tenancy Act, the Madras Estates Land Act, section 55, section 15(4, the Rent Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 77, the Tenancy Act, Section 77(3, the Tenancy Act, section 77, Section 25, Section 25, Section 14A, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 14A, Section 14A., Section 10, Section 14A, Section 10, Section 10, Section 14A, Section 10, Section 10, Section 14A, Section 14A. Such, Section 14A., Section 25, Section 10, Section 25, Section 24, Section 14A, the Tenancy Act, Section 24, Section 77, the Tenancy Act, Section 77, the Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, Order under Section 77, the Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 25, Section 14A, Section 25, Section 14A, Section 14A, Section 25

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, NO.6915 OF2021(@ SLP, Ejectment, the Civil Court, Suit, the Trial Court, Mandir Jhoke Hari Har, The Trial Court, Judgment, Suit, Counsel for the Appellants, Counsel for the Respondents, Suit, Suit, Suit, the Revenue Court, The Trial Court, the Revenue Authorities, The Trial Court, Court, Suit, Mahant Ramji, The First Appellate Court, The Appellate Court, the Appellate Court, Jamabandis, Suit, Jamabandis, Suit, Mahant, Suit, the First Appellate Court, Decree, The High Court, The High Court, the Civil Court, the Punjab Tenancy Act, Civil Court, Suit, the Punjab Land Revenue Act, Revenue Courts, Suit, the Revenue Court, Court, Suit, Officers, Revenue Courts, Original, Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, a Civil Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Punjab Land Revenue Act, Grade, Appeal, Review and Revision, Suit, the Civil Court’s, Authority, the Appellate Authority, Financial, a Civil Court, Mahant, The Assistant Collector, Collector, Mahant, the Civil Courts, Order of Ejectment, Court, Court, a Civil Court, Suit, State of Punjab, another2, Bench, inter alia, Court, Haryana High Court, the Assistant Collector, the Surplus Area Collector, Mam Raj v. Punjab State, State, Order, Judgment, the Judgment of this Court, Salem Advocate Bar Association, T.N. v. Union, Haryana High Court, the Writ Petition, the Order of the Authorities, Judgment, Court, SCCOnline, R.S.A. No.948 of 2017, the High Court of Punjab, Judgment of this Court, Hari Ram, Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corpn, Diamond & Gem Development Corpn., Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corpn, Diamond & Gem Development Corpn., Court, Cambridge University, Lal Chand Public Charitable Trust, Lal Chand Public Charitable Trust, Hari Ram, Hari Ram, Hari Ram, the Orissa Tenant Protection Act, the Orissa Tenant Protection Act, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, Suit, the Collector under Section 7(1).11, Solon, Court, Judicial, Suit, the Civil Court, the Revenue Court, Himachal Pradesh, Court, Magiti Sasamal, Suit, the High Court, Judicial, AIR, SC547 this Court, the Orissa Tenants Protection Act, Court, Court, Suit, the Civil Court, the Revenue Court, Court, the Lahore High Court, Lahore High Court, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, Judges of Punjab, Haryana High Court, State, Suit, Order, Authority, R.S.A. No.1511, Application, Haryana High Court, the Civil 35 Court, the Civil Suit, the Civil Court, Civil Revision, Haryana High Court, Suit, Court, Haryana High Court, Suit, Court, the Order of Utilisation, Haryana High Court, Suit, Suit, the Civil Court, Court, Haryana High Court, the Civil Court, the Writ Petition, Court, Haryana High Court, Suit, the Civil Court, Haryana High Court, the Revenue Court, a Civil Court, Haryana High Court, the Civil Court, Court, Suit, No.1821, Court, the Revenue Court, the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, the Revenue Court, a Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, Legislature, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, the Lahore High Court, MANU, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Courts, MANU, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, the Judgment of this Court, the Delhi Rent Control Act, Court, Division Bench, Court, Lordships, Tribunal of limited jurisdiction, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, the Rent Controller, Messrs Pitmans's, Shorthand Accadamy v. M/s. B. Lila Ram, Court, Division Bench, M/s. Indra Motors Kurali, Rent Control Journal, Division Bench, Balbahadar, Rent Control Journal, a Revenue Court, Court, Court, Court, the Revenue Court, Court, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, the Rent Control Court’s, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, the Revenue Court, inter alia, the Civil Court, Tenancy, Revenue Courts, Court, a Civil Court, a Civil Court, a Revenue Court, Civil Court, First Group, the Assistant Collector, the Assistant Collector, MAGITI SASAMAL, Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Assistant Collector of, the Assistant Collector, the Assistant Collector, the Assistant Collector of the, the Assistant Collector, the Assistant Collector, the Assistant Collector, MAGITI SASAMAL, The Civil Court, Court, Authority, a Civil Court, inter alia, Civil Court’s, the Civil Court, Appeal, Review and Revision, the Revenue Court, Civil Court, Court, the Revenue Court, the Civil Court, the Statutory Authority, the Civil Court, the Assistant Collector, Appeal, Review or Revision, a Civil Court, Order, Order, Order, Authorities, Authority, the Civil Court, Authority, the Order of Eviction, Authority, a Civil Court, Authority, Mahant, Authority, Appeal

DATE: 2004, 1953, 13.09.1972, 04.09.1973, 22.08.1974, the year 1965-66, 1981, 20.10.1955, five years, a period of, 20 years, No.4, 1872, the beginning 7, 20.10.1955, 5 years, the year 1939-40, 26.08.1960, 26.08.1960, 1887, year, 1887, 1953, 15.04.1953, 1887, 1887, 1949, 1949, 14 16, 14-A., 1887, 1887, 60 days, 81, 82, 83, 1887, 17 20, 1822, 1974, 81, 82, 83, 1887, 2005, 2020, 2013, 2013, 1947, 2010, 2010, 1948, the 1st day of September, 1947, two months, 1-9-1947, 1956, 1962, 1948, the 1st day of September, 1947, two months, 1987, 14.10.1985, 1980, 1970, 1973, 50, 3629, 1974, two and a half years, 3730, 1971, 1968, 04.11.1970, 1963, 1967, 1968, 15.07.1969, 1822 of 1978, 12.03.1981, 1987, 1981, the year 1935, all these years, 10 (1964, 1963, 45, 1968, 1968, 1975, 1980, 47, 14, paragraph-15, 4842, 1887, 1953, the 15th of August, 1947, 1953, 61, 2021

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, JUDGMENT K.M. JOSEPH, Ferozepur, Order, Ferozepur, Jhoke Harl Har, Jamabandi, Mandir Jhoke Hari Har, Shri Inder Singh, Jhoke Hari Har, Ferozepur, Marlas, Ramji Dass, Ramji Dass, Ramji Dass, Ramji Dass, Mandir Jhoke, Ramji Dass, Ramji Dass, Ramji Dass, OPD4, OPP5, OPD7, Ramji Dass, Mandir Jhoke Hari Har, Mahant Ramji Dass, Ramji Dass, Balak Nath, Mohan Dass, Ramji Dass, Ramji Dass, Ramji Dass, Ramji Dass, Ramji Dass, Shankar Singh Etc, Singh Etc.1, Order, Haryana, Amar Singh, R.S. Sarkaria, Dhaunkal, Man Kauri, R.S. Sarkaria, Kamla Devi Widow, Hans Raj, Haryana, F.W. Maitland, Kapahi, Kapahi v., Magiti Sasamal, Pandab, Magiti Sasamal, Pandab Bissoi, Vinod Kumar, Order, Heman, Appellants, Tulsi Ram, Lrs, Chandu Lal v. Kalia, Goria, Kul Bhushan, Faquira, Kul Bhushan, Order, Ramzani, Abad Shah, Ashiq Hussain, Jia Lal, Haryana, Magiti Sasamal, Shri Raja, Jaswant Rai, Bhagwan Dass, Raja Ram, Raghubir Singh, Magiti Sasamal, Dalip Singh, Amar Singh, Controller, Narain Singh, Pollapalli Venkatarama Rao, Verkayya, Ratan Singh, another10, Gupta, Rattan Singh, Controller, Muni Lal v. Chandu Lal, J.G. Kohli v. Financial, Haryana, Hindi Sahitya Sadhna, Singh, Order, R.S. Sarkaria, Amar Singh, Order, Order, Order, Order, JOSEPH

NORP: J.1, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Lahore, d., Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Punjab, Statute, Statute, Statute

CARDINAL: 2, 1, 04.02.1974, 594, 17, one, No.1 to 17, 2, No.1 to 17, 17, 18.11.1978, 3 5, 594, 17, 16.11.1956, 16.11.1956, 4, 8, 17, 5, No.4, 16.11.1956, 6, 25.01.1956, 26.08.1960, 8, 9, 10, 42, 11, 44, 45, three, 77, 1, 3, three, 2, 3, 15, 2, 1New, 11, 16, 23, 24, 84, 25, three, 16.11.1956, 16.11.1956, 19, three, 2, 101, two-fold, 21, 84, 23, 26, 1, 3, 5, 6, 1, 3, 5, 3, 153, one, 4, 2, 262, three, 27, 6 AIR1962SC54728 Section 7, 10, five, five, five, 29, 3, 6, 6, five, 3, five, five, 8, 4, 191, 14, 34, five, 07.01.1982, 06.01.1976, 50A, 3, 6, 10.03.1976, 13.11.1981, one, one, 38, 31.08.1971, 29.5.1970, 39, 40, 4, 12, 9, 739, 42, 788, One, 43, four, 38, 1, four, 46, 689, 1, 49, 77(3, 10, 2, 1,000, 3, sub section 3, 2, 10, 3, 2, 51, 3, 2, 3, 3, 52, two, 2, 53, 3, 2, 3, 54, 55, 56, 2, 57, tenant.53, 58, 59, 60, 62

WORK_OF_ART: Collector 1st Grade, 2(1, The Judgment of learned, Tholu and others7, Section 14A of the Act

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, 1st, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, third, first, Second, first, first, second, first, first

GPE: Harnam, Singh, Rs.1,000/-, Guru, Chela, jurisdiction.15, others4, Bhagwat Sharan, Hariram, order.27, Karam, Magiti Sasamal, Daya Ram, Singh, Richpal, Singh, Richpal, Singh, judicata.32, Khazan, L.P.A., Masunuru, Richpal, Singh, Richpal, hereinbefore.54, NEW DELHI

LOC: Additional District, Single, Single, Single, Single, Mt. Harnam Kaur, Single

PRODUCT: Mandir, Mandir, Mandir, Mandir, Mandir, Mandir, Mandir, Mandir, Mandir, Mandir, Judgment, Mandir, Mandir, Order of Eviction.11, 9-A.-, Mandir, Mandir, The Full Bench, the Full Bench, Judgment, Purushottam, the Full Bench, Judgment, a Full Bench, 376, Order VII, Mandir

FAC: Revision, Sections 80, Sections 80, the Civil Court.33, Judgment

PERCENT: 6 SCC3444, 7 AIR1963SC36131

QUANTITY: 6. xxx xxx, 30 b.

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //